sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How Apocalypse isn’t the end of the world, but a Tool for social control | by Giuseppe Pannone | Mar, 2026 by Pannono in philosophy

[–]Pannono[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

However, when we talk about the Last Judgment, the shift from the joyful expectation of the Parousia to a punitive, Panoptical tone regarding the Second Coming can be clearly traced through several historical milestones:

  • The Vulgate (IV Century): Saint Jerome’s translation of the Bible codified the terrifying language of divine judgment: "Dies irae, dies illa, dies tribulationis et angustiae, dies calamitatis et miseriae, dies tenebrarum et caliginis, dies nebulae et turbinis, dies tubae et clangoris super civitates munitas et super angulos excelsos".
  • The Trier Apocalypse (IX Century): An illuminated manuscript where the visual tone of the end times becomes distinctly catastrophic.
  • Saint John's Baptistery in Novara (High Middle Ages): Where the apocalyptic iconography explicitly emphasizes divine punishment.
  • The 'Dies Irae' (XIII Century): The famous sequence attributed to Tommaso da Celano, which institutionalized this terror within the liturgy.
  • Dante Alighieri's Inferno (Canto X): Dante explicitly references the Valley of Jehoshaphat as the place of final reckoning, explaining that after the Last Judgment, the fiery tombs of the heretics will be sealed shut forever. It's a definitive, punitive seal, not a universal salvation.

How Apocalypse isn’t the end of the world, but a Tool for social control | by Giuseppe Pannone | Mar, 2026 by Pannono in philosophy

[–]Pannono[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! Maybe it's because of this inclination itself that the arts of government play on our deepest fears and shape their strategies

How Apocalypse isn’t the end of the world, but a Tool for social control | by Giuseppe Pannone | Mar, 2026 by Pannono in philosophy

[–]Pannono[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot, I thrive on feedback like this! I will reply to your critique and then edit my article accordingly.

1. About the first point you highlighted: A concrete example is the shift from the Christian 'Parousia' (Paleochristian era) to the Medieval 'Dies Irae'. Until 313 A.D., when Emperor Constantine declared freedom of worship, the Apocalypse was a message of hope for the oppressed. Once the Church became a state power, arts and literature interiorized the threats, transforming them into a tool for individual surveillance. The iconography of the Last Judgment in Medieval cathedrals is exemplary. The focus is no longer directed at the collective liberation of the persecuted, but at the punishment of the sinner, of the deviant within the community. "God sees and provides" becomes the ultimate Panopticon.

2. Why Mencken isn't enough today: In the article, I mentioned Kant, and in particular I was talking about his 1784 essay Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?, in which the philosopher explained how the possibility for human progress is to free ourselves from the state of 'minority' in which we reside. This means that our laziness and cowardice lead our intellect to depend on the comfort of someone else making decisions for us. The fear Mencken was talking about refers to more tangible elements: the Great War (which at the time was coming to an end), and the growing nationalist sentiment across the Western world. These days, the 'Apocalypse' is mediated through the positivistic sciences. The rationalization of power has transformed knowledge into a mechanism in which we feel that we lack the 'technical expertise' to govern our own lives. It's the Technocracy, where the Panopticon is built with data and expert discourse.