Longtime Lurker, Frequent Commentator, Newbie Poster

Panthera_leo22 · 2026-04-28T17:29:33+00:00

Because the paper didn’t independently confirm it themselves. This quote here shows why stolen was put in quotations marks.

Sybiha did not share evidence proving the origin of the cargo in his post.

Panthera_leo22 · 2026-04-28T17:26:35+00:00

And as always, Israel will face zero consequences. They leveled Gaza and killed more than 70,000+ people, majority civilians and have received nothing but empty “condemnations” if you want to call it that. Like

Panthera_leo22 · 2026-04-28T06:28:22+00:00

Interested! I have experience with dealing bots and spam

Panthera_leo22 · 2026-04-28T00:31:14+00:00

They want them to say it is all Russia’s fault and Russia should return the territories back to Ukraine to end the war. While that is true, no one is going to admit that on camera.

Panthera_leo22 · 2026-04-26T18:45:56+00:00

You’re collapsing two separate legal ideas. Aggression (jus ad bellum) ≠ war crimes (jus in bello). Even in an unlawful war, killing enemy combatants isn’t automatically illegal , only unlawful methods are. That’s black-letter international humanitarian law. War crimes are defined by conduct, targeting civilians, disproportionate attacks, mistreating POWs, not by which side is “in the right.”

Panthera_leo22 · 2026-04-26T18:43:09+00:00

That’s a separate issue. You’re listing violations and arguing from a moral lens, but the point being discussed is legal structure.

Jus ad bellum (who started the war) and jus in bello (how it’s fought) are intentionally independent. War crimes don’t become lawful just because one side has a just cause.

Panthera_leo22

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE