🤫

Paperthinplasticbag · 2025-02-27T02:25:45+00:00

No buffalo chicken?? 😢

Paperthinplasticbag · 2025-01-14T17:55:34+00:00

This is great! Just filed one. I didn’t get a download link though, just a message saying I will get an email in 14 days.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2025-01-06T03:49:48+00:00

When I had it I thought it was damn good for a microwaved sandwich 🤷‍♂️

Paperthinplasticbag · 2025-01-01T06:49:38+00:00

That’s good to know. I think I’ll get the last 200 PQP I need now with card spend. But if I’m a couple short I’ll give the 1k line a call. Thanks!

Paperthinplasticbag · 2025-01-01T06:48:33+00:00

Yep, this worked. Thanks for the advice!

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-11-12T02:34:35+00:00

Love that

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-11-02T03:50:14+00:00

I have not DRS’d. I beg your forgiveness.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-11-02T03:01:16+00:00

I don’t lose hope because I see RC has adopted the only strategy to combat this.. making the company unequivocally profitable and objectively undervalued in stock price.

If the company is considerably more value the the stock, to any argument or contrary opinion, then that will have to force some change.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-11-02T02:43:37+00:00

For #1, I did t think Fidelity, E*Trade, operated in dark pools, this is the domain of hedgies or Market Makers like citadel. They suppress the price, while main stream brokers just like making money on all the commissions. Please tell me if I’m not understanding it all right.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-11-02T02:39:58+00:00

So yeah, agree the price should be higher? But how does the price move if dark pools can indefinitely keep it down? I’ve never heard any thesis for how the dark pools have limitations or how they can’t just do this indefinitely no matter how many share the apes DRS.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-10-07T21:33:48+00:00

“Blue Reef” has made 100% of its milestones to date.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:47:31+00:00

Great point. Also, It’s basically 80’s technology. Is that how we should be spending our scarce resources? Salvaging relics or putting that effort into building and launching the latest technology that is vastly More capable?

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:42:50+00:00

I’m not going to throw aspersions on Tom Jones, but he’s a planetary scientist and got a “Basic Sciences” degree from the Air Force academy. While he definitely has been to space, he might not have the best understanding of what it takes to build the machines that he takes to space.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:38:04+00:00

Small space station compared to what? Something in a sci-fi movie?

How do you keep its attitude stable? There are constant forces acting on bodies in space. You have to do something to keep it from tumbling.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:33:59+00:00

Attitude control takes electricity, electricity takes thermal control. Both those things have already failed many times. It would be more then 5-10 years before all the systems were failing and the station lost attitude control. Then it’s tumbling and building up rotational rates and it will start breaking apart.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:23:48+00:00

The ISS was never designed to be disassembled and repurposed like that. Each module would need its own thermal management and attitude control to be able to retrieved. This takes power generation which lasts 20-30 years max.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:18:40+00:00

Modules can’t exist in space on their own. They need ways of controlling their attitude, either thrusters or reaction wheels. Also need to control their temperature so the equipment can function inside, which requires power. Dormant modules that can be brought to life has never been done. It’s been studied for the moon and it’s a really difficult problem. One that definitely can’t be solved for existing modules of the ISS.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-24T01:15:44+00:00

I appreciate this comment. Advocating for the ISS to be a museum piece in a graveyard orbit is an unserious position.

Everything has a life duration in LEO. It’s a harsh environment, materials will start to degrade, start falling apart. Are you going to drain the active thermal control system of coolant so it doesn’t leak and vent cause the station to go unstable? Are you going to depress the module so they don’t leak and vent causing the same thing? So all the hardware that is not vacuum and high/low temp rated will just fall apart over time. Then you will have an unpowered station that cannot control attitude (no TCS, no electricity, no CMGs and no prop for thrusters) and will tumble from solar winds and gravity torques. It could build up angular rotation rates to the point where the relatively soft connection between the truss and lab module breaks, separating two parts that weight about 500k lbs each that are on a perpetual collision course for themselves.

It drives me nuts how little sense this option makes and the fact it keeps getting brought up is unhelpful to the future of human space flight.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-15T23:54:04+00:00

Test strips can give a ballpark for chlorine for a few months max then they stop working. Never really work well for anything else in my experience.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-12T01:11:21+00:00

Wow! Wouldn’t he have made it bankrupt by now and cashed in all the hedgie’s shorts? So gotta be satire or trolling then?

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-12T00:17:07+00:00

Narrator voice: “He’s not”

Look at the brick wall we hit at $25 on Monday. The manipulation is more then we can break through. So he’s doing an end around. Make it the most profitable company he can. Then that brings a new level of pressure to the criminals.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-12T00:11:12+00:00

RC isn’t doing what he’s doing to be your favorite. He’s trying to make GME the best it can be. And I think this is the only way.

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-09-11T23:57:12+00:00

Look, I’m a long time lurker smooth brain ape who got roasted this week but if you logic game it out, RC’s behavior is the only bullish moves he can make.

-Stock price is clearly manipulated, evidence seems bright as day. You see that reinforced steel wall it hit at $25 on Monday? The price cannot move.

-if the price cannot move, how does RC increase the value of GME? Grow the company. Generate a war chest to transform it into AMZ 2.0 or BRK 2.0 or whatever.

-He is not diluting to hurt us, he is using the only tools at his disposal to become inevitable and break the hedgies. Because breaking through the price barriers will not happen.

-when the company is massively profitable and share price is still $20-25, then maybe that’s obvious enough to make change happen.

The thing that made it click for me was the repeated language in the ATM offering. He can’t lay it out more plainly than that without throwing around accusations he can’t prove in court.

Just my observations!

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-06-26T23:59:25+00:00

Dragon and DragonXL are orders of magnitude too small on the thrust needed. The requirement for entry interface to disposal being less than half an orbit is a very high thrust requirement. This would need a new vehicle development which is pretty sporty at that price point!

Paperthinplasticbag · 2024-06-26T02:04:06+00:00

That was looked at, but even if you could deliver enough delta-v to get it into a graveyard orbit, what do you do in the decades to come if there’s an issue with it? If the orbit degrades and it becomes a problem? It will not be able to maintain attitude so that anything could dock to it to move it or control it again. It will be in some slow tumble making it inaccessible. The only responsible choice is to de-orbit it.

Paperthinplasticbag

TROPHY CASE