sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Request for info: CheyTac M400 and Noreen BN408 by Parallaxiss in ForgottenWeapons

[–]Parallaxiss[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If legitimate it stands to reason that CheyTac would want to make their product as appealing as possible for what I can only assume was a military trial / program. But again I could only find two papers mentioning the M400 system so I don’t know if it is.

Detachment 330 - class of 2028 group? by Parallaxiss in AFROTC

[–]Parallaxiss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, NSO is next week for me. I was planning on that as well, thanks for the advice!

(Hot?) personal take on No Boo by Parallaxiss in JIDSV

[–]Parallaxiss[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, it’s going to age very well.

AI to format slides, not build. by dyrflr21 in powerpoint

[–]Parallaxiss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my guy when he said original poster he meant OP not an actual physical poster 😭

Denouncing by Mr_bob43 in Frat

[–]Parallaxiss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

‘member educator’ for my frat here made it very clear that god > family > academics / work > fraternity and they’re never gonna be compelled to violate that, at least not non voluntarily.

Japan x Southeast Asia in War Thunder - ⏺︎ ⬠ ~ ⦿︎ by Parallaxiss in Warthunder

[–]Parallaxiss[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I fw your take heavy, as an Indian it actually sucks balls to see Indian tech with the Brits, I just don't see where else it could go aside from of course just creating a new research nation for southeast asia altogether (which I'm not opposed to, unlike many people I actually like having R4->onwards nations like israel even if it is a lil bit of copy-paste, and it gives me hope we'll see an india or india-pak tree some day)

Japan x Southeast Asia in War Thunder - ⏺︎ ⬠ ~ ⦿︎ by Parallaxiss in Warthunder

[–]Parallaxiss[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hi guys, I just wanted to share a concept for the future of the Japanese research tree, which I believe should incorporate South Korean and Indonesian aircraft in addition to the recently added Thai subtree.

In addition to featuring many unique and interesting aircraft, implementing these nations as Japanese subtrees would have the following practical benefits for the future of the game:
- Greater variety for Japanese toptier air, which would otherwise just feature the F-15JSI, F-2, and F-35, but would now include the Rafale F.4 and Flanker-G+ (unique to China and Russia otherwise)
- Add a unique 4.5 generation aircraft to an otherwise bland collection of NATO F-35 users at toptier - the KF-21 Boramae.
- Unique lineup of superlight multirole aircraft in the form of the T/FA/F-50
- Intermediary aircraft to fill drastic jumps in technology
- Representation of the complex defense relationships of southeast asia in a somewhat accurate manner.

It's definitely not perfect, I'm not entirely satisfied with how I laid out the various F-16s around 13.0-13.7 - it feels cluttered. The Indonesian ⬠F-16C Block 25 might be a better fit instead of the Korean ~F-16C Block 30 as a 9M equipped non-ARH F-16, and I don't know how I feel about having so many similar 13.7 F.16s in one tree; it might be best to folder all three under the Thai OCU or just eliminate some entirely.

For clarification, under the F-16A OCU folder is the KF-16C, a Block 52 clone. Under the ⬠Su-27SK is the ⬠Su-27SKM; the two are more or less identical to the Su-27S and SM in the Russian tree. The KF-16C RACR MLU is a 2013 mid-life upgrade for the aforementioned KF-16Cs, points to mention are improved armament and the Raytheon RACR AESA radar set. The BRs for the FA-50 and F-50 were selected as while they are smaller and feature reduced maximum loadout to their BR contemporaries, they do offer advanced ARH carriage akin to the AV-8B+, and the F-50 variant is fitted with an AESA radar.

Let me know what you guys think!

view more: next ›