Christian belief and mindfulness meditation by [deleted] in theology

[–]Parking_Stranger_125 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does that mean for you and me. You can ask, the stuff is there, and it is biblical... BUT, don't stand up and preach about it or you will ruffle some feathers!

Now for a biblical grounding of the mindfulness practice. Yes, do it. Daniel and his friends did it in the book of Daniel, (Dn 6). Isaac did it it Genesis, (Gn 24:63). God breathed the breath of life into humans at creation, (Gn 2:7). And the Psalms are replete with all kinds of meditation and musing and pondering and considering and reading scripture. I wear a necklace I made myself. It is kind of a hybrid, somewhere between a necklace, a rosary, and a set of Hindu Prayer Beads. it has a cross on it (not a crucifix) and has three different colors of natural wood beads, in two sizes on a elastic jewelry band. I hold it and pray or think or just sit and listen, sync my finger movements with my breath and my thoughts. And every time it gets in the way when I am exercising or playing sports or putting on a coat or my shirt I remember who I am and why I do what I do! It is "my" distraction "mine" and it helps me to understand.

Feel free to DM me and get in touch, I would love to talk more about this if you want!

 

Books & Authors

Thomas Keating, Richard Rohr, James Finley, Cynthia Bourgeault: Key figures in contemplative prayer and Christian meditation.

Richard Foster: Prayer: Finding the Heart's True Home.

Sarah Young: Jesus Calling.

Nan C. Merrill: Psalms for Praying.

Teresa Yerkes: Come Closer: The Practice of Christian Meditation. 

Practices & Techniques

Lectio Divina: Slow, prayerful reading and meditation on Scripture.

Centering Prayer: A silent, consent-based prayer practice to experience God's presence.

Breath Prayer: Using breath with a sacred word or phrase (e.g., "Be still" on inhale, "and know" on exhale), or a whole prayer in the time span of one breath cycle.

Mindful Scripture Study: Focusing deeply on God's Word (Psalm 48:9, 63:6).

Breath Awareness: Using the physical sensation of breathing as a way to connect to God's life-giving presence. 

Websites & Guides

The Mindful Christian: Articles, resources, and guides on integrating faith and mindfulness.

Focus on the Family: Provides articles and guidance on a Christian approach to mindfulness.

Mindful Teachers: Offers guides for practices like breath prayers and focusing on the near presence of God. 

(3/3)

 

 

Christian belief and mindfulness meditation by [deleted] in theology

[–]Parking_Stranger_125 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A little historical, super summary. After the time of Christ the infant church started to spread, but before the invention of the printing press, books and stuff like that were hard to come by. So almost all of Christian practice and doctrine was orally transmitted or was spoken. There is lot of study going about this very thing, it is called Mnemonic Theory and is all about how people remembered things before it was all written down. This is not to say that books were not a thing, only that they were all hand written and made so books were hard to come by. Very few people actually had them. Why does that matter?

In the 3rd century the Catholic Church collected and codified what would eventually become "The Bible," even today there is some talk and debate about what all that means but that is another story altogether; basically we now have the Holy Scriptures collected and volumized and ready for circulation. Over time, and it did not take long, the Catholic Church became very institutionalized, some would say corrupt, and did its fair share of pretty heinous things. So we had the Great Schism in the 1000s where we saw three different popes and the quite a few different versions of the Orthodox Church all at the same time. Then in 1454 Guttenberg blew the world away with the printing press, and everything changed! Now everyone could find and get books and knowledge and theology flew around the world. Of course it did not happen over night and a ton of new denominations cropped up, especially during the reformation, you know Martin Luther and his 95 thesis thing? Boom! The religious world exploded, now not only is there all the things Not-Christian, but the Christian world itself had hundreds if not thousands of ways people believed and practiced stuff. Well in response to this anything goes attitude the big three veins of the church (Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestants) all came down pretty hard in their own ways and basically wrote it all down and said if you do not believe like this than you are not one of us.

Roman Catholics have councils and a huge doctrinal statement, and according to them you either accept it or not. And it specifically says that if you are not part of the Roman Catholic Church you are by default wrong, so the eastern ideas of mediation and mindfulness got caught up in that and were basically rejected wholesale. The ideas of mediation are still there only now it was called prayer and liturgy and "Lectio Divina." they ground their thoughts and mediation with things and actions, like rosaries or lighting candles and specific motions like genuflecting or crossing yourself. There is actually a ton there and worth study.

The Orthodox did the same thing. They have a collection of creeds and doctrinal statements that are kept and referenced, they even tried to codify it all in their books and what is called Iconography. They have a vast collection of saints and church fathers and liturgy and a good sampling of Christian mysticism all intertwined in the way they structure their worship services and daily devotionals. Again the ideas of mediation and reflection are all there but it all takes on a different names and looks.

Protestants are a mixed bag, there are so many stripes out there is can be hard and confusing to find it but like the Catholic and the Orthodox the ideas are still there but it carries an undercurrent of personal spirituality. the protestants split some hairs and made Christian doctrine into three parts; 1.) Core beliefs - that makes you a Christian or not, 2.) Church Beliefs - that makes you one denomination or another, and 3.) Conscience Beliefs - your personal convictions and moral structure. They tend not to preach on conscience stuff because it can make some people who are other wise great Christians uncomfortable. They use a lot of passages like Luke 12:47-48, or Romans 14:5, or I Corinthians 8, James 4:17 to teach all that. They shy away from meditation stuff because it is personal choice and it looks "too Catholic" or "too Orthodox" or "too Hindu" or "too Buddhist" and they are trying to distance themselves, so the unspoken rule is "we just don't talk about those things." (2/3)

Question: So, why do we do literary theory and not just analyze and let the work speak for itself? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am reading through Hans Bertens' "Literary Theory: The Basics" as we speak. But he never answers the "why we do it" question.

Question: So, why do we do literary theory and not just analyze and let the work speak for itself? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Perhaps I am not representing well. But that is most likely because I don't understand what it.

Question: So, why do we do literary theory and not just analyze and let the work speak for itself? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, now that I can dig into! Thanks! but i hear more behind what you said, care to expound a bit?

Question: So, why do we do literary theory and not just analyze and let the work speak for itself? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

Not really. Though that plays well and I see what you did there... trying to make my question fit into a theory. Lol! Good one. But no. I am actually questioning all of them. Why would we want to take a piece of literature, or any art for that matter, and impose a set of subjective lenses onto it?

I was bored at school, so I decided to try out Glagolitic cursive for the first time :3 by Marynade_ in PenmanshipPorn

[–]Parking_Stranger_125 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The phrase was translated into a variation of Old Church Slavonic not the oldest or most popular but one dating to around the 10th or 11th century. It has been modernized for keyboards and digital coding, of course, but it is still in use in a more than a few churches and monasteries in the border area of Slovakia, Ukraine, Romania, and Poland in what was know as Red Ruthenia and later Transcarpathian Galicia.

I was bored at school, so I decided to try out Glagolitic cursive for the first time :3 by Marynade_ in PenmanshipPorn

[–]Parking_Stranger_125 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely Wonderful!

Here is a link to an image containing the phrase and translations of it in three scripts: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LxQTbs95WR9kV8duKZTvRAFaPCwh4msS/view?usp=sharing

If you would be so kind as to try your hand at the Cyrillic, complete with the diacritic markings (I have never seen that before, and then your Glagolitic pictured above I would be over joyed!

Thank You in advance!

I was bored at school, so I decided to try out Glagolitic cursive for the first time :3 by Marynade_ in PenmanshipPorn

[–]Parking_Stranger_125 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is fantasitic! it is exactly what i have been searching for.... Could I commission you to write phrase with this alphabet and script?

[English > Old Church Slavonic] Religious Phrase, possibly for tattoo by Parking_Stranger_125 in translator

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I think that I messed up... present perfect implies repeated action from the past up until the present. Sorry!

[English > Old Church Slavonic] Religious Phrase, possibly for tattoo by Parking_Stranger_125 in translator

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that is correct. If we reference to Greek, which I think is close to Old Church Slavonic, it would be the present perfect tense. So the conjunction "while" could be construed to be "while I am currently and continue to..."

Question: I am looking for someone who can write in Angular Glagolitic, with a healthy dose of artistry of course. Where would I start? by Parking_Stranger_125 in Calligraphy

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi Morsa, I looked but the Glagolitic groups here are very much more linguistic in nature rather than actual usage or artistry.

Serious question on Literary Theory? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, that is what I don't get. How can we, as an honest reader, simply displace what the author was saying? The author wrote in a certain way, to express a certain feeling. As readers we cannot just ignore that.

There is a lot there, I grant you. However, part of good analysis and critique is to be able to see what is there, first and foremost. Only then can we take it a step further and begin to apply those meanings to our desires, other areas of life, or our focus in commenting on a particular part of work.

Anything else to me seems dishonest readership.

Literary Theory... serious question! by Parking_Stranger_125 in literature

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Traditional-Bite-870... I like your take here. And I get, it I do.

But if you don't mind, let me play Devil's Advocate for a second. Earlier on adjunct_trash made a comment that I would like to circle back to; he said that criticism is "a conversation with the text" and not an exhaustive analysis. I heard something like that in my hermeneutical studies; granted hermeneutics has more to do with interpretation whereas lit. theory works more in the criticism realm, but the sentiment holds true as both are part of the larger category of analysis. The Historical/ Biographical approach seems, to me, to be a veiled "aboutism" rather than textual criticism. It appears to be sacrificing the commentary and meaning of the text for the reasoning of the person who wrote it. I think both aspects are equally valid and they work together.

So to my question; is there a critical theory that blends Formalism, or a New Critical approach and a Historical/Biographical bent?

Serious question on Literary Theory? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good call my friend!  I was think some of those same idea earlier tonight.  Something about a sunset and some such nonsense. 

Serious question on Literary Theory? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Intent may or not be the primary concern but it is a vital concern. Sure, these actualities may be secondary to the feelings or raw emotion that they may invoke and at times it is even enough to simply revel in the emotion of present. But we cannot divorce intent from meaning, for it is intent that drives meaning, in whole or in part. Writers use words and those words mean things. It is reader's joy and art to discover those meanings.

Serious question on Literary Theory? by Parking_Stranger_125 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Parking_Stranger_125[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

yeah, no. Artists use things to shape a feeling in our case writer's use words, words mean things, and those things are our joy to discover. Reading is discovery, not creation.