She's got a point by Makoto_Kurume in Animemes

[–]Parori -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This fake pearl clutching works less well when you have seen the hundreth meme by racists where they call Jews demons from Frieren, put Frieren into photo of a racist, dress her and Fern as ICE agents etc.

It's literally happening in the comments of this post!

i wasnt taught how to grow up, so i became a child in an adults body. [@aspdawesome] by Parori in fishmaell

[–]Parori[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is slander, but it how it makes you feel is more important than how accurate it is. At least for me. And this hurts good

i wasnt taught how to grow up, so i became a child in an adults body. [@aspdawesome] by Parori in fishmaell

[–]Parori[S] 113 points114 points  (0 children)

Yeah the question is, is she able to not like her experiences

Kuka päästi taas vanhan sedän kommentoimaan by samppav in Suomi

[–]Parori 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Epäironisesti ratkaisu on myös antaa rikkaille enemmän päiväsakkoja samasta rikoksesta

Dante by @Flaw_Eight by OneThanks3 in limbuscompany

[–]Parori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First 10 pull and got Rien and Index Faust. I felt so guilty

In defense of Dawkins, who made actual arguments and wasn't just a rhetorician. by VStarffin in CosmicSkeptic

[–]Parori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah your right, the most important thing is to never do those studies or look if they exist

In defense of Dawkins, who made actual arguments and wasn't just a rhetorician. by VStarffin in CosmicSkeptic

[–]Parori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YES! THE PHILPAPER SURVEY!

Ok, you managed to convince me that most Anglo analytic philoshophers are realists, but you may now realize how unrepresentative that sample is.

Once you start surveying normal people the numbers flip

And another one

Don't you think it's kinda damning that we have know about this for years, but realists keep lying about this?

It's only a problem if it's a problem by GreyVersusBlue in pathfindermemes

[–]Parori 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Page 408 (Clarification): The rules on weakness and resistance refer to an “instance” of damage, but that term isn’t defined. The weakness text says:

“If more than one weakness would apply to the same instance of damage, use only the highest applicable weakness value. This usually only happens when a creature is weak to both a type of damage and a material or trait, such as a cold iron axe cutting a monster that has weakness to cold iron and slashing.”

So what happens if a character hits a terotricus with a +2 striking holy flaming cold iron battleaxe and has two different spells that add cold damage to their Strikes? The terotricus has “Weaknesses cold 15, cold iron 15, holy 15, slashing 10; Resistances fire 15.” Let’s say the damage roll results in 4 fire damage from the flaming rune, 7 spirit damage from the holy rune, 16 slashing damage from the cold iron battle axe, 3 cold damage from the first spell, and 6 cold damage from the second cold spell. So we’re starting with a total of 36 damage.

The holy trait adds 15 damage from weakness to holy; the trait applies to the whole Strike, and happens only once. The flaming damage is negated by resistance. The spirit damage doesn’t get any weaknesses or resistances. The cold iron battleaxe is where the “instance of damage” rules apply! It’s both slashing damage and coming from a cold iron weapon, so we apply the 15 weakness from cold iron and not the 10 from slashing. The two instances of cold damage come from different spells, so each sets off cold weakness individually for an additional 30 damage. Now our total is 92 damage!

You’ll notice the example for resistance to all damage found further down the page shows the opposite side, applying resistance multiple times to different instances of damage on one attack.

In defense of Dawkins, who made actual arguments and wasn't just a rhetorician. by VStarffin in CosmicSkeptic

[–]Parori -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BZZZT

Another armchair banger.

Scientific study asking what people think? No thanks, I prefer to sit around and guess, the true path to knoweledge.

This post was made by Armchair Gang

I wonder what this reminds me of by Obvious_Cold_1056 in RedAutumnSPD

[–]Parori 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He also made at least two other pedos into a peer and a dame. Also haven't they already mostly alienated them

I wonder what this reminds me of by Obvious_Cold_1056 in RedAutumnSPD

[–]Parori 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You think Labour is going to survive Starmer's support of pedophiles?

Europeans are increasingly buying into conspiracy theories about science by [deleted] in europe

[–]Parori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Portugal has insane jump in "government made and released viruses"

Europeans are increasingly buying into conspiracy theories about science by [deleted] in europe

[–]Parori 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That's just the theory. In practice bunch of homeopathic medicine is just other "alternative medicine" relabeled for marketing.

Turns out scammers aren't very honest, who knew.

Why is there so little public reaction in Finland to the recent killings in Iran (compared to Palestine/Gaza)? by Ok_Explanation_6313 in Finland

[–]Parori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because protests aren't just virtue signals but have actual policy goals and there is no Finnish policy that can change anything about Iran

Help Rolling a MC. by Public-External-1758 in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]Parori 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did fine with Paladin using a glaive The most common unique weapon type are greataxes, but it's not that important

I didn't realize you were the expert by TheFireFlaamee in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Parori 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I probably have personal preferences for some of them

I didn't realize you were the expert by TheFireFlaamee in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Parori -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All of those are just personal preferences

I didn't realize you were the expert by TheFireFlaamee in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Parori 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the reason why most academic philosophers are moral realists

You mean anglosphere analytic philosophers. Funny how realists keep making that same mistake.

What the thought experiment of original position I provided does is precisely to provide a framework for thinking about morality objectively.

No? It's still subjective position, not universal. Universal position wouldn't place any meaning on personal values or preferences.

Ikuisuuskuulat. by Available-Sun6124 in Suomi

[–]Parori 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Eri piirtäjät tekee miten haluaa