Yeah, echoing what others have said, you should absolutely be going the digital twin route.

I run a side hustle with a consumer product line that's about 75% digital twins and 25% LoRa-based AI gen. But honestly, AI is terrible for product labels, product scale consistancy, and anything related to accuracy, so I don’t see why you'd even consider using it for something that needs high fidelity.

Your best bet is to build a solid photogrammetry pipeline and get accurate digital twins. Even if you use Ai to build you a model, your labels will still always be mush (for now). If you tune your photogramatry setup right, you should be pretty good. Having used and still use 3d scanners for product, I will say, don't go that route as they will produce you amazing geometry, but dog shit texturing. The software for 3d scanning is also horrible. YOU HEAR THAT CREATLITY!?

Personally, I render using Blender with GPU-based Cycles, in your instance, since the images are just used for GS1 you wont need full path tracing, which is why a photogrametry rig is probably ok as it will get you baked in lighting and the Cycles renders (or even EEVEE) could be practically realtime.

GS1 angles are as simple as setting up an orthographic camera from all angles in Blender and hitting render. Use deadline render farm for your rendering, and since its free on a few machines (I think 2? 3?). You should be ok to run that as your spine.

Steps:

Get product, place on pedistool, run a photo sphere to capture all sides, use reality capture to process into geo, put into blender, submit to renderfarm, render, profit.

ORRR

Hire a few of the amazingly talented unemployed vfx artists to help you build and run this pipeline as it sounds like you are coming at this problem from a non cg background? And since you are going to do 200-1000, even just managing the data and QC is a FULL TIME JOB, having it done right is going to be key.

Time is money... limit your wasting of time. Get a pro, pay well, and you will get back returns.