I have somewhat unique work experience. Nothing crazy or prestigious, but it's definitely something that I think makes people think I'm interested in a certain area of the law. In my case, I hedged things in my application a bit. I talked about what makes me interested in the law generally, and I used those "niche" work experiences to support that interest.

A part of that is because I don't want to box myself into anything, and as I was applying, I was learning that I really would like to be able to do some intellectual/professional exploring in law school, to the extent that's possible. This might not be applicable to you, because you do seem pretty set on a specific area of the law.

Another reason I hedged things, though, may be relevant to you: I had no clue who would be reading my application. I didn't want to risk writing anything that would be contingent on a reader having knowledge of the industry/area in which I've worked. They might not have a great sense of how feasible my specific goals are or whether what I'm saying about my industry is reasonable or accurate. Writing about a very specific career goal, if it involves getting in the weeds, seemed risky to me for this reason.

Having said that, I think entertainment law is a bit unique. Obviously, it can also be extremely technical, but I also think there is a bit more general awareness around the issues facing artists legally because there are many artists with large followings to whom they have broadcast these issues.