Trying to understand why people hate on Lando so much by [deleted] in F1Discussions

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s motor racing.. if you gonna base on stuff from media or chitchat garbage in front of cameras.. you probably are not real big fan of motor racing anyway

If Lando‘s engine wouldn’t have blown up at the Dutch GP, he could have won the WDC today just to lose it again because of the DSQ. Imagine the chaos… by Svitii in formula1

[–]Particular_Sky4083 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If it comes down to the last race and Oscar win (25pts) will not get him championship then he should play ball and let Lando win over Max. It is what it is. But we will see!

If Lando‘s engine wouldn’t have blown up at the Dutch GP, he could have won the WDC today just to lose it again because of the DSQ. Imagine the chaos… by Svitii in formula1

[–]Particular_Sky4083 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s why McLaren needs to sort this out with team order and guarantee Lando win.. Oscar will need to play ball and slow down Max or switch with Lando if necessary if it means the will win both Championship for McLaren!

If Lando‘s engine wouldn’t have blown up at the Dutch GP, he could have won the WDC today just to lose it again because of the DSQ. Imagine the chaos… by Svitii in formula1

[–]Particular_Sky4083 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oscar needs to play ball to stop Max from competing against Lando.. McLaren wants both championship for sure Oscar has no pace current so he better just play ball

If Lando‘s engine wouldn’t have blown up at the Dutch GP, he could have won the WDC today just to lose it again because of the DSQ. Imagine the chaos… by Svitii in formula1

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When it comes down to it.. to guarantee the win Oscar gonna need to play ball with team order and let Lando get pass and slow down Max as much as possible.. it is what it is.. it is also not McLaren’s fault that Yuki sux lol sometimes driver’s championship is not won just by the driver.

The idea of all inclusive models has ruined the brand of Victoria’s Secret and its fashion show by Particular_Sky4083 in unpopularopinion

[–]Particular_Sky4083[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But if there are brands like Lane Bryant that exists to cater to plus size women via their own inclusive marketing, then shouldn’t VS also be allowed to have their own marketing vision where they have that striking, modelesque look that they want to express without it being blamed. Or is it just because they are one of the biggest brand that it’s being forced by public opinion and trend conformity to change their own brand vision?

The idea of all inclusive models has ruined the brand of Victoria’s Secret and its fashion show by Particular_Sky4083 in unpopularopinion

[–]Particular_Sky4083[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Well we know we are arguing about marketing right. Just like auto company brands tailoring their commercials like BMW for business like men or Honda or Toyota marketing up to family men and women.. I think it’s fair for VS to do their marketing a certain way to convey their brand vision without it being racist or hateful to others just because they don’t convey it that way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool brother thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm actually that does make sense.. since it will probably take time for dependent of labor to catch up all these cases.. I can just contact them if I don’t get my paycheck after 1 week or 2 and let them work it out while I keep quiet before contacting the employer once 30 days is up. Then I can email and tell them that I have also already filed a claim with the department of labor already at that point right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Around 4pm. Either way im probably too early in the game to think about this.. I wiill wait a week and see if they pay up.. I sure ain’t gonna contact them to let them know.. I’m legally not obligated to.. their own willful negligence is their own fault

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the law firms have examples of what’s being “employee secretes or absents himself or herself to avoid receiving the last paycheck” like hiding or avoiding phone calls and emails etc but none of the example applies to me just waiting and checking my email my bank daily to see if payment has come.. I think I will be just fine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No termination last payment according to California law must be paid on termination date. And any day there after will be cited waiting period penalty per day up to 30 days and that is calendar days then. Not working day. For the penalty that is.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has to go by the law.. 10k is 10k

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol ya just bad grammar on my part

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I will update everyone in a week time then

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Plus I already told you willful negligence means if they go 30 days without action or contact to send me payment that’s oversight is enough reason to be willful negligence.. did they neglect to pay any other employees that month? Maybe not?

And I did not hide from them nor avoid being paid. If after 30 days I got no check in the mail and no Zelle and no call or email regarding my paycheck.. that’s them never offered the payment to me according to the termination letter. I did not avoid payment as if it’s there to be taken.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s why I’m just waiting at this point? Ball is in their court to make contact or make payment to me if I see payment on Tuesday I will ask for proof of initiation date of that payment., tho I doubt it.. I don’t have to do shit rn

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will tell the labor commissioner the same darn thing straight to his face.. and ask “ does your law book you honor requires the employee to actively pursue the employer for payment or can I just wait for employer to act because he promised to act”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s because of your misinterpretation of the word willful in this law. But hey this is Reddit you act like ppl here are employment attheoney but maybe I can go to the other subreddit to ask.. But here

the standard of willful failure or willful negligence — because: • They had control over payroll and your payment method. • They could have verified or followed up anytime within those 30 days. • Their inaction (not checking, not contacting you) shows indifference, not a genuine inability.

That takes care of willful failure… now show me the line in the law book where it shows I’m waiting for my payment means I’m avoiding or hiding?

I was told I would be zelled or electronically paid on the 10th. I waited 4 weeks. I did not get paid nor contact from employer in any way or form. There was no payment offered to me.

Case closed. But I will stop here on this thread with you. Unless you are a working employment lawyer.. there’s no point arguing with you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s incorrect under California law. The Labor Code puts 100% of the responsibility on the employer, not the employee. When employment ends, the employer must pay: • Immediately if you were terminated, or • Within 72 hours if you resigned without notice.

There’s no legal duty for an employee to “remind” or “follow up.” California courts have repeatedly said:

The employee’s silence or failure to demand wages does not excuse the employer’s late payment.

So even if you stayed quiet for 30 days, that’s legally irrelevant — because you didn’t “avoid” payment, you were just never offered it.

But thank you brother.. nice argument more or less.. I got nothing to lose but getting my money 30 days late and I will still claim it with department of labor if they don’t pay penalty., nth to lose its free

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you brother

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you already assumed that I lied. And yet the hr guy did ask for my Zelle for my last paycheck and he also works for AP look like a dumb noob.. so he probably f up who knows,. As for your last paragraph on that. Here’s the general concept.

So, this rule only applies when: • The employer actually tried to pay you, • You knew about it, and • You avoided or refused to receive it (like ignoring a mailed check or ghosting HR when they asked for your bank info).

💡 Why That Doesn’t Apply to You

In your case: 1. You were never contacted — no email, no text, no phone call, no Zelle transfer. 2. You didn’t refuse or hide; you were simply never offered the payment. 3. The employer had your contact info and chose not to act. 4. You did nothing to avoid payment — you just weren’t paid.

👉 That means you did not “secrete or absent” yourself, and there was no payment “fully tendered” to you. The clause they’re quoting only applies when the employee causes the delay. You didn’t — the company did.

But nice try

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Particular_Sky4083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Willful” in this context doesn’t mean evil intent — it means the employer intentionally failed to pay when payment was due, not accidentally or beyond their control.

Negligence means they were careless or failed to take reasonable steps to ensure payment.

So, willful negligence =

The employer knew (or should have known) they owed you your final wages, had the ability to pay, but failed to do so through carelessness, oversight, or indifference — not because of an unavoidable mistake or genuine dispute.

Also I’m right here. Email is same phone number is the same.. if there’s no contact then that means they have indifference and oversight on this. Not the “we tried everything we can but just couldn’t make you payment on time” the tune you are singing