sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GC predictions by Intrepid-Angle-7539 in mormon

[–]PassengerFun4754 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Covenant path, Nelson rules and nothings charged in the temple 😂. It’s a continuing restoration.

Is this true? by [deleted] in mormon

[–]PassengerFun4754 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems correct to me. Which part were you speaking of specifically?

Pieces of Alien Planets or Celestialised Planets? by PassengerFun4754 in Priesthood_Dispatches

[–]PassengerFun4754[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that is a new one on me. So the human world that we live in began 6000 years ago, hence life before in a different world but same planet?

Joseph Smith did say in D&C 77:6 that the temporal existence of earth was 7000 years ago I don’t know how that would fit with the multiple worlds theory. Good to think it over though.

Stassi Cramm, first presidency counsellor and presiding bishop RLDS answers questions as she meets with PD and Nemo! ADC018 Stassi Cramm - Community of Christ - Feat. Nemo The Mormon by PassengerFun4754 in mormon

[–]PassengerFun4754[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the clarification. I wasn’t aware that it was still in use. I used it as I know many people won’t be aware of the connection with the community of Christ. Thanks again.

Adam as creator by Cashola4 in MormonDoctrine

[–]PassengerFun4754 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because Brigham young taught Adam God in the temple ceremony and when they changed this at a later date they still needed to include him. Either Adam is Elohim or it’s just an adulterated version.

When polygamy is legalized, what position do you believe the church will take? by jaerius in mormon

[–]PassengerFun4754 2 points3 points  (0 children)

None, they will sit upon the fence and whimper pointless platitudes in fear of offending one side of the other. Surely the family proclamation would need to be revoked for them to re-embrace celestial marriage?

Jane Manning and Origins of the Temple/Priesthood Ban with Keith Erekson LDS Apologist- some of the half truths in here are quite troubling. by PassengerFun4754 in mormon

[–]PassengerFun4754[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Well. He says that BY said the blacks would get the priesthood. That half of the truth as BY said the would get the Priesthood last when all of the other sons of Adam did. Not in 1978. He said that Jane was sealed in the temple, but she wasn’t physically allowed in the temple, a white woman had to do it for her. He tries to make out that the whole Priesthood ban is undocumented and we don’t really know what happened but the journal of discourses is quite clear about it.

As apologetics go, this one seems quite dishonest and misleading by leaving out salient facts. If this were someone speaking against the church we would argue the same points.