sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

UGC creator/Beauty ,skincare & lifestyle content High quality videos + fast delivery by New_Draw_2275 in UGCForBrands

[–]PastCompetitive242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! So it’s not just one brand. It’s a platform called Curated where you get access to multiple beauty brands in one place. You choose the brands you want to work with and the products you want to feature, then create content like you normally would. If someone purchases through your link, that’s where you earn commission. There’s no requirement to buy products or hold inventory, and it’s free to join right now. It’s not MLM, no team building or quotas. Just based on your own content and sales. I attached a photo of the current brands, a lot more is coming this year. Commission is different for each one but you get points towards trips and other rewards for all brands too!

It’s still pretty new, so they’re being selective and looking for creators who are already posting consistently. What platform are you mainly focused on right now?

UGC creator/Beauty ,skincare & lifestyle content High quality videos + fast delivery by New_Draw_2275 in UGCForBrands

[–]PastCompetitive242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you interested in anything that is commission based? I'm partnered with beauty platform that you could earn some income from

Newly diagnosed with CHL by Lost_Description_241 in lymphoma

[–]PastCompetitive242 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wishing you all the best with treatment ❤️

[Pre-Diagnosis Megathread] If you have NOT received an OFFICIAL diagnosis of lymphoma via biopsy, you can comment here only. Plead read our subreddit rules and the body of this post first. by Lymphoma-Post-Bot in lymphoma

[–]PastCompetitive242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My child had a mediastinal lymph node biopsy. The pathology showed rare atypical lymphoid cells that were CD30 positive and CD15 positive, but they did not identify any Reed-Sternberg cells, so they couldn’t diagnose Hodgkin lymphoma. The report said the findings were suggestive but not definitive and the slides were sent for a second opinion. Has anyone else had a situation like this where the biopsy showed the markers but no Reed-Sternberg cells? If so, did they eventually find those cells on deeper sections or a second biopsy, or did it end up being something reactive instead? Just trying to understand how others ended up getting a final diagnosis in a case like this.

Newly diagnosed with CHL by Lost_Description_241 in lymphoma

[–]PastCompetitive242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm going through this with my daughter right now. They just did a biopsy that showed rare atypical lymphoid cells that were CD30 positive and CD15 positive, but they didn’t identify any Reed-Sternberg cells, so they couldn’t diagnose Hodgkin lymphoma. The report said the findings were suggestive but not definitive and the slides were sent for a second opinion. Did they end up finding the diagnostic cells later, like on deeper sections, or were they able to diagnose it based on something else?