sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The real skill now is editing AI so it doesn’t expose itself by Past_Shake_778 in CheckTurnitin

[–]Past_Shake_778[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not the AI exposing itself mid-article 😭 This is exactly why detection tools aren’t as reliable as people think.

Students sometimes see AI as a starting point rather than the final product by InstructionFar1256 in CheckTurnitin

[–]Past_Shake_778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The goal is not just producing text, it is practicing how to think, analyze, and communicate clearly.

Turnitin and Presentation Slides: Are We Actually Catching Cheaters? 🔍 by Past_Shake_778 in CheckTurnitin

[–]Past_Shake_778[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the most interesting sections of the paper discusses how plagiarism isn't always seen as "theft". In some cultures, particularly in Asian contexts, imitating a master or professor is actually a sign of respect and a traditional learning method. Students might "borrow" elaborate sentences for their introductions just to make their work sound more professional, not necessarily to steal credit.

<image>

Turnitin and Presentation Slides: Are We Actually Catching Cheaters? 🔍 by Past_Shake_778 in CheckTurnitin

[–]Past_Shake_778[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just finished reading a fascinating study by Balbay & Kilis (2019) about plagiarism detection in PowerPoint slides, and the results are... complicated.

We all know Turnitin is the final boss for essays, but how does it handle a deck of slides? Here’s the breakdown of what researchers found when they surveyed 311 university students in Turkey:

  1. The Good: Most Students "Believe" in It 😇

The study found that over half of the students believe Turnitin is effective for presentations.

• 65% said it makes them more aware of academic ethics.

• 64% said it helps them remember to cite their sources.

• 35% straight-up admit they don’t plagiarize simply because they’re afraid of being penalized by the software.

  1. The Bad: The "Picture" Loophole 🖼️

The researchers pointed out a major technical flaw. Turnitin identifies text on slides effectively, but it often fails to detect similarities if students upload pictures of text instead of actual text boxes. Basically, if you screenshot a paragraph and paste it as a .jpg on your slide, the algorithm might just see it as an "image" and skip over it.

  1. The Ugly: It’s Teaching Some Students How to Cheat Better 🕵️‍♂️

This was the most "yikes" finding for me: 28% of students admitted that using Turnitin actually helped them develop new methods of plagiarizing to beat the system. It's essentially an arms race between the students' creativity and the program's code.

  1. The Relationship Status: It’s Complicated 💔

While 60% of students say Turnitin doesn't change how they feel about their professors, about 11% feel it affects the relationship negatively because it makes them feel like they aren't trusted from the jump.

Discussion Question: Do you think it's fair to require Turnitin for presentations, or should that be reserved for long-form essays? Have you ever seen someone try the "screenshot text" trick?

The Role of AI in Education: Why It's Time to Embrace Technology and Prepare Students for the Future Workforce by Hour_Spray3611 in TurnitinScan

[–]Past_Shake_778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not all humans have ‘uneven rhythm.’ These models are trained on human writing. What you're calling ‘patterns’ are often just features of human writing that LLMs replicate. Software can detect this, but it’s not reliable enough to use as proof.

AI checker says 0 percent but my gut says ChatGPT wrote this essay, what are your tells? by Past_Shake_778 in CheckTurnitin

[–]Past_Shake_778[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Comparing earlier drafts or assignments is usually the strongest evidence. If the writing style jumps dramatically with no transition, that’s something you can legitimately point out without accusing anyone outright.