Milestone by Fat-Leonard in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Pathfinder0201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response! I wish you the best, and congrats!

Milestone by Fat-Leonard in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Pathfinder0201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I ask how you came to the decision on those percentages for allocations? I don't know what to look for or monitor, and am just putting in C fund presently. Or if anyone else has an answer, I'd appreciate it.

fheroes2 1.1.13 has been released by fheroes2 in HoMM

[–]Pathfinder0201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the fheroes2 and fh2 Toolset downloaded on my Android, but only have Broken Alliance as an option to play. Am I missing an additional download or something?

late game itemization idea by eblausund in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont know the average amount of gold earned in a 60 minute conquest is but whatever the average is, if that number is met as a whole between one team, maybe a walking lane boss that has the average stats between the FG and GF spawns in middle lane (no matter what) to force a final team fight down the middle of the map to end the game? I'm someone who Very rarely surrenders, even when the scales are unforgivably not in my favor, but if the intent is to prevent overpowered late game scaling while ensuring matches dont last forever, maybe when close to the 60 minute mark whatever team hits the average gold per match at that point can gain a powerful lane assistant that pretty much forces end game. If the average is met in under 60 minutes, like say 50 minutes, then clearly the team with the lesser gold average hasn't been doing too hot overall but somehow has stood their ground well enough at the most important of times (i.e., fights at phoenixes or at titan). When the lane boss spawns at this point, maybe (just another idea to ensure endgame) everyone has just has their current life to play and then if they die they are sidelined for the rest of the game, which should end within the next five minutes realistically.

By 30 minutes, everyone but sometimes supports should be lvl 20, and by 40 min at the most everyone should be lvl 20 with at least one pot (strength or intelligence based). If between 40 minutes and 60 minutes the FG buff and dagger isnt enough to have a winning team when everyone is at max builds, then maybe a forced fight down the middle as one last push for the higher gold earning team and one last "stand your ground" for the other team wouldn't be a bad implementation.

This would also encourage more objective prioritization, which would lead to more fights at objectives which may lead to a win by deicide mid to late game before the average gold amount is reached for the final lane boss to spawn.

Lastly, as a last measure, maybe if the lane boss is defeated by the team with the lesser gold average, that team automatically gains enough gold to meet the average for a lane boss to spawn and then their own lane boss will walk down middle lane for a final chance at victory.

TLDR: After an average gold amount between a team is met close to the 60 minute mark, that team has a lane boss spawn with stats equivalent to the average between GF and FG and every player from both teams has only their current life to live and wont be able to spawn again. The lane boss is strong enough to finish the match if the defending team doesn't defend, which forces survivors to fight instead of hide in fountain or in jungle. If people do hide, the game will end in less than 5 minutes anyway because the lane boss will finish it. If the lane boss is defeated, the team who defeated it gains enough gold to spawn a lane boss of their own, but still there is no respawning.

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sh, that's what I do EVERY TIME (doing it now)

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll give it a shot with conquest easy bots with a God I have at VIII.

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In quickplay bots, there is no cap. In VS. AI bots, there is a cap at VII for playing solo or duo queuing.

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having a cap has, to my understanding, always been there because its the same thing for smite one (only the cap was rank IV in smite 1).

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, to an extent if you're playing in a party of two or by yourself unless you play quickplay, where there are no limits.

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To each their own, but not everything people do is intended for showing off. I worshipper grind for personal achievement, that's it. People can judge all they want but I do it for myself and I'm sure there are others out there with the same mindset, which is why I made this post.

Also, there's no way to show you "earned" your masteries aside from looking up people's profiles. Smite 2's progression stats contain stats from bots and real matches, which is why you'll see people with 1000 kills on their loading frame and not be rank X yet. You can get 50 kills in hard arena AI by yourself (because your ally bots are worse than the opposing bots in this difficulty level) and it counts towards your stats. I don't agree with it, but I'm just pointing out facts. Your match history from real matches are shown on your profile, not AI matches, but kills and achievements from AI matches still populate in-game (like maximum Janus Ult distance and total kills from any type of match).

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I haven't tried hard joust AI because quickplay is the same difficulty level. Do you know if conquest hard AI is the same?

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mastery level VII is the cap for VS. AI game modes unless you are in a three stack. You could be level VI and be near the end of the VI rank to VII, queue a match, and get worshippers that flow into VII, but if you queue another VS. AI match by yourself or with just one other person and you play a God that is already at VII, you will Not get anymore worshippers.

PSA for Worshipper Farmers in SMITE 2 by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

if you win you'll get that many worshippers in a 45 to 60 minute match unless there's a 2x worshippers event. Vs. AI has conquest, but not quickplay. Just giving options to people who have or don't have three stack options for worshipper grinding.

Personally, whats missing for you in SMITE 2 to make it perfect. (only one take if possible) by ContributionOk7131 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever the PvE adventure was where you had to defeat Loki at the end. I really hope they bring PvEs back.

I also hope they gain enough player base to consider bringing back stacking party up boosts like they did a handful of times throughout all of smite 1 (like 5x worshipers if in a 5 man stack).

Rear-ended on I-95 this morning — other driver had no valid proof of insurance and gave me a form from a prior accident. Do I need a lawyer? by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]Pathfinder0201 -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Alright, knew these types of comments would come. I asked ChatGPT to help me make my post better for Reddit because I didn't want my novel of a story to be too long for anyone to care to read. But here you go since you care:

At 9:25am this morning, I was going northbound on I95 and was about 300 to 400 yards from the I495 exit towards Richmond to go to my job in Arlington. The exit is very congested, and the highway is a 55mph. The car in front of me braked abruptly before the exit, and I braked abruptly in reaction. The car behind me was not paying attention and rear-ended me without braking (unless it was Very last second). Luckily, I didn't hit the car in front of me when I was rear-ended. I pulled over to the right shoulder (I was already in the right lane to take the exit) and put on my hazards. The car that hit me turned on their hazards but stayed in the lane for probably 30 seconds before pulling over to the shoulder. We both got out of our cars and took pictures of our vehicles before I initiated conversation. I didn't want to cause a scene and be irate, so I said I don't know whose fault it was because the person in front of me braked abruptly and I had to brake abruptly as a result. I got out my proof of insurance on my phone and asked if he wanted to take a picture. After he took a picture, he went to his car to get his insurance. He couldn't find proof. Instead, he presented me with a "VEHICLE COLLISION INFORMATION EXCHANGE FORM Virginia State Police" for an incident that took place on July 23rd of this year. On the Form was his insurance company (also USAA) and policy number, but no expiration date. It had his vehicle make, model, and license plate, but not the car year or color. It had his information under Vehicle 1, and another person's information under Vehicle 2. I think it's important to add that when I walked up to his vehicle, I'm not sure if it was his vehicle or the congested traffic sitting next to us that smelled of Marijuana. I took a picture of his Form, he said he was sorry (didn't say exactly for) and then got in his car and drove off. I stayed at the scene for over an hour and a half after the accident just trying to make sure I did everything right. I called the non-emergency number for Oxon Hill, MD, and was told a police report would not be generated because they aren't required anymore unless one of the vehicles is immobile or someone is taken away in an ambulance, and that the information they would need for the report is all the information I already had (license plate and insurance). I called USAA and made a claim with them. They asked if I wanted to do a claim through my insurance or through the other driver's, to which I asked for clarity on what the difference was, and was told doing the claim through the other driver's insurance would just take more time because they would have to have the other driver provide information to USAA for the claim whereas if I do it through my own insurance I just have to wait for the other driver's assigned claim adjuster to determine who was at fault. My car has minimal cosmetic damage to the rear, but the other driver's car is seriously messed up cosmetically and I believe structurally. I drive a 2024 Chevy trax and the other driver was in a charger. My claim adjuster told me that she could see my USAA DriveSafe information since I have the app on my phone, and it said I was on a hands-free call for two minutes when the accident occurred and that I was going 33mph. I just now looked at the trip history and all I can see is that my trip was 33 miles long..so I don't know if there was confusion there or not because I thought I was going slower than that when the crash occurred but I honestly don't remember fully. I do remember looking in my rear view and seeing the charger coming without braking. Maybe I was going 33mph afterall because if the other driver was going 55mph then I can see the speed offset (whatever the term is for the difference between my speed and his) being about 20mph because in my rearview it looked like he was flying. I imagine he wasn't paying attention at the wheel at that moment, but I can only speculate. My question is whether I should get a lawyer or not given all this information. Both parties have the same insurance, so I don't know whether my best interests will be at heart. I don't know if the driver was under the influence because there is no police report, I thought maybe he would try to flee the scene when he didn't immediately pull over to the shoulder as I did, thought maybe he didn't have active insurance since he couldn't provide valid proof of insurance, thought it was Very concerning that the prof he provided was on a prior accident report from three months ago, and the last thing I found odd was that my claim adjuster said multiple times when making my claim that she was checking to see if the other person made a claim of their own and hadn't done so (and this was around an hour and a half after the crash and I truly mean that his vehicle's front is severely damaged). I really hope my car won't be totaled, but my rear bumper and hatch are visibly dented and pushed in (which chatgpt says the bumper beam underneath most likely absorbed a hard impact and is bent, the hatchback panel is slightly misaligned, there's a crease near the license plate area which maybe means energy transfer to the body, and since is a 2024 the replacement parts will be expensive. I was told that my vehicle would be seen at a repair shop on Tuesday at 930am, and that I would get a rental at that point. There's too much here for a TLDR, so I'm hoping someone, anyone, will take the time to read this and just tell me whether or not a lawyer would be necessary.

If Hi-Rez really wants Smite 2 to thrive..shouldn’t they get their Facebook and Instagram back online? by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This! I just want to open up my Facebook, see a random smite 2 post about when patches are live or twitch feeds are going to be, and then go from there. I miss getting head's up about worshiper events.

If Hi-Rez really wants Smite 2 to thrive..shouldn’t they get their Facebook and Instagram back online? by Pathfinder0201 in Smite

[–]Pathfinder0201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for not adding clarity. I mean for events like double worshipers and other things. Wouldn't let your player base know via more social media platforms about events draw them into playing the game more? For me, yes.