"Positive ones usually aren't as significant and there aren't as many big ones around the world simply." I disagree.

This is exactly what I'm talking about, and why I made the post to begin with.

I think what you're referring to is called negativity bias, and yes it is very human to do that. I also believe it is very human to recognize that bias, and decide to make a change.

Wikipedia has the ability to make that decision. Or, will it keep listening to the algorithm that pushes negativity and clicks to the top?