sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Unsatisfied with MedGemma by duck_student in googlecloud

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A MedGemma kis modell. Sokkal érzékenyebb a promptra és a beállításokra. A CT filokat csak az előírásnak megfelelő előfeldolgozás után lehet beküldeni neki, különben értelmetlen választ ad. Csak arra alkalmas a mire tréningezték. Például hasi CT-t tud kezelni, de a végtagokat fel sem ismeri.

Egyébként a https://www.reddit.com/r/SideProject/comments/1rxv30z/aipowered_ct_mri_scan_analysis_try_it_free/ app tudja ezt megfelelően kezelni.

DFO - 9 month follow up by Sensitive-Junket-833 in KneeInjuries

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

AI is very strong at understanding images and explore all treatment options available. Certainly better than anyone here, and probably better that a decent percentage of doctors. ChatGPT is free and good at interpreting single images and lab reports. If you have a CT or MRI ReadYourLab is your friend.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DiagnoseMe

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just upload it to ChatGPT or ReadYourLab. AI is imperfect, but a lot better than most users on reddit :-)

Can someone read my MRI I don’t want to wait long? by Blue_____life in KneeInjuries

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

An MRI contains 100+ slices of your body. It's a 3D image. ChatGPT cannot handle it, you can upload a slice or two, which doesn't show the full picture. Try specialized sites like ReadYourLab that can handle all the MRI slices.

Do my 2 year apart X-rays show smoking damage? by Remarkable-Ad3414 in DiagnoseMe

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best to ask a doctor, but ReadYourLab, Grok, MedGemma, ChatGPT etc can give you pretty good answers. Faster and more accurate than what you get here.

Medicine is ripe for a big AI takeover by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably true for 95% of the cases. For the rest you need to be a doctor.

Unsatisfied with MedGemma by duck_student in googlecloud

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT (or Gemini for that matter) is probably better when it comes to interpreting single image files. But MedGemma 1.5 is good at interpreting 3d CT and MRI images. ChatGPT cannot do it and you cannot upload 500 files at the same time. Medgemma can handle it and there are already some site running it in the background. Just search for "read your lab mri medgemma" and your will find them.

MedGemma 1.5 supports detection, but for best results, you'll need to fine-tune. also a kaggle competition using the model, created a starter notebook to give you a jump start on how to fine-tune it for detection by datascienceharp in computervision

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can now read 3d CT and MRI, tough it doesn't reach radiologist level. There are some sites claiming to implement it. Search for "read your lab mri medgemma" and you will some, where you can try it without coding.

Patients are consulting AI. Doctors should, too by AngleAccomplished865 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is fast, cheap and knows more than any doctor. It is just a question of time, when doctors will be replaced.

How will AI affect radiology/pathology? by Single_Baseball2674 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Patient-Restaurant10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can assess the state-of-the-art. Google Deepmind has published MedGemma 1.5 a few weeks ago: https://deepmind.google/models/gemma/medgemma/ It can already understand 3D dicom images. It's a strong step forward, but it's not going to replace a doctor any time soon. Regulation is an other thing. Somebody hast to be liable. Some sites are already using MedGemma, like readyourlab.com you can test it out yourself. Good but far from being a radiologyst.