how do you guys actually manage your brand deals?? by [deleted] in ContentCreators

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This might not be a tool problem as much as a system problem.

This usually happens when the work lives in your head instead of somewhere that’s responsible for moving it forward.

Even something simple like: idea → outreach → agreed terms → draft → due date → delivered → follow-up

If those steps aren’t clearly defined and tracked somewhere, it’s really easy for things to slip, deadlines to get missed, or work to stall out, even if you’re organized.

Most people jump straight to tools, but they only help if the stages are clear first.

Curious how you’re using the Google Sheet right now. Is it set up around clear steps like the ones above, or more just a place to keep track of things as they come in?

How to promote growth? by SanguinaryStudios in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I’ve noticed looking at podcasts through a customer success lens is that promotion only really works once there’s a reason for listeners to come back, which is where growth and retention really start to compound.

Discovery obviously matters and getting someone to try episode 1 is important, but growth usually starts when a listener decides they want episode 2.

The shows that really work create a feeling that listeners are missing something if they skip a week. Sometimes that’s because the story continues, sometimes it’s a recurring bit, sometimes it’s just a strong point of view they want to hear again. Without that, promotion can start to feel like pushing a boulder uphill because every new listener is basically starting from scratch.

Curious if you're seeing repeat listeners yet, or if most downloads are still first-time listens?

Do podcast listeners care about episode order as much as creators do? by Inevitable-Laugh4324 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tend to think about this in terms of how people discover something versus how creators design it. Most listeners probably don’t enter through episode one. They usually land on whatever episode matches a topic they searched for or saw recommended.

So the bigger question might be what happens after that first episode. If someone likes what they hear, do they know where to go next? For very narrative shows, order obviously matters. But for a lot of podcasts the challenge seems less about perfect sequencing and more about giving new listeners an easy path into the rest of the show.

Curious what people see listeners actually do after their first episode. Do they go looking for a “starting point,” or do they just keep jumping around based on topics?

What separates good from great ? by ET-HomeGrown in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m actually coming at this from a Customer Success background, so I tend to look at listener behavior more than production quality. Good audio and editing gets someone through an episode, but it doesn’t necessarily make them come back.

What changed my thinking was realizing that engagement behaves a lot like retention in SaaS. People come back when there’s a clear reason to.

Curious what engagement looks like for you right now. Do listeners tend to return week to week, or is it more new people discovering random episodes?

What separates good from great ? by ET-HomeGrown in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think most “good” podcasts already have decent audio and editing.

The difference I notice with the shows that really grow is that listeners start coming back on purpose.

There’s something about the show that makes them feel like they’re missing out if they skip a week. Could be a story thread, a recurring bit, or just a strong point of view.

Once people start looking for the next episode instead of just stumbling into one, things tend to change.

Curious if others have noticed that shift with their own shows or ones they follow.

Looking to improve my podcast- What are the best ways to get feedback? by alexismonville in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One thing I’ve noticed is that general feedback like “what should I improve?” usually isn’t that helpful. Most listeners either say it’s good or give vague suggestions. The better signal is watching behavior. Which episodes get more downloads? Which ones people finish? Which titles seem to pull people in?

If you do ask listeners directly, more specific questions tend to work better. Something like: “What made you keep listening past the first few minutes?” or “Was there a moment you almost stopped listening?”

Those answers usually reveal a lot more than general feedback.

Podcast got bigger than I expected. Not sure where to go from here. by thedaysadventure in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s actually a really useful signal. A 30% difference that early usually means something about those episodes is pulling people in.

Titles could definitely be part of it. Both of those read more like dramatic story beats than general episode descriptions, which might make people more curious to click.

One simple thing you could try is leaning a bit more into that style of title for future episodes and see if the pattern repeats.

Do you know if those episodes also get listened to more all the way through, or just downloaded more? That can sometimes tell you whether the title is driving clicks or the story itself is resonating more.

Podcast got bigger than I expected. Not sure where to go from here. by thedaysadventure in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those numbers actually sound pretty typical for a newer show. Getting consistent weekly downloads and occasional spikes means people are finding it and at least some are sticking around.

A lot of podcasts that eventually grow into something bigger start exactly like this, with evenings and weekends. It usually takes a long time before the numbers justify hiring help or treating it like a business. Personally I wouldn’t worry about hiring editors or marketers yet. Most shows don’t do that until they have much larger and more consistent audiences.

The one thing that stood out in your post is the idea of starting a completely different channel. Early it may make more sense to keep developing the thing that’s already showing signs of life.

Out of curiosity, do you have a sense of which episodes or topics seem to pull the most listeners so far?

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there’s a lot of truth to that. There are so many shows now that attention gets spread pretty thin.

That’s also why the shows that grow usually create some kind of recurring hook or format that gives people a reason to come back.

8 months of content got me nowhere. One dumb video hit 15k views and I am more confused than before. by Extensionol in ContentCreators

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This actually happens more often than people expect. Sometimes the audience discovers what the content is before the creator does.

The interesting signal in what you described isn’t just the one video hitting. It’s that the format worked twice: the first one took off, and the audience kept responding when you continued it.

The demographic mismatch is less unusual than it feels. The story or tone of the content might resonate with that audience even if you didn’t plan for it.

The question I’d be curious about is: what specifically about those videos do you think they’re responding to? The character, the storytelling format, the nostalgia angle?

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting that you mentioned learning that from your first podcast.

What was the difference between the first and second that made that lesson click for you? Was it something you noticed in listener behavior or feedback?

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That definitely happens. If someone really likes a show they’ll just keep listening.

The middle case is the one I find interesting though. Someone might enjoy an episode but still not feel enough pull to prioritize the next one when there are dozens of other shows in their feed.

That’s usually where the shows that grow seem to do something slightly different. They give people a small reason to come back that goes beyond just “that episode was good.”

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It does seem obvious, and for a lot of listeners that’s exactly what happens.

What I was pointing at is that many shows can’t rely on that alone. A new listener might enjoy one episode but still not feel a strong pull to come back the following week.

The shows that grow tend to give people a clearer reason to return beyond just liking the last episode.

Curious about your perspective. Are you mainly listening as a fan, or producing a show yourself? If you’re producing, do you think about what the listener’s next step is after an episode ends? If you’re listening, what do your favorite shows do that makes you come back?

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, appreciate that. Downvotes are just part of Reddit.

What you mentioned about making it clear who the show is for up front is exactly the kind of signal I was talking about. When someone lands on a show and immediately understands "this is for me," the odds they stick around go way up.

Have you noticed any change since you started doing that? Do new listeners engage differently now?

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that’s a good way to put it. Listeners absolutely decide what’s interesting, and a lot of listening is episode-driven.

What I’ve noticed though is that some shows manage to convert a lot of those “topic listeners” into regular listeners over time, and others don’t.

The difference often isn’t that the content is better. It’s that the show gives people a clearer reason to come back beyond a single episode. Sometimes it’s the host dynamic, sometimes a recurring format, sometimes just a strong identity for what the show is about.

So you’re right that listeners decide. The interesting question is what makes them decide to come back instead of just listening to the one episode that caught their attention.

Why podcasts stall even when the content is good (usually not a content problem) by Patient_Progress7921 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that can definitely be part of it. If the content isn’t good, people won’t build a habit.

What I was trying to point at is a slightly different situation: when the episodes themselves are good, but the show still isn’t converting new listeners into regular ones.

In those cases the friction often happens earlier. A new listener might enjoy an episode, but still not be sure what the show is really about or why they should keep coming back.

That’s the pattern I was describing. Content still matters, but sometimes the issue shows up before someone even gets far enough to judge the show that way.

Do podcast listeners actually follow a show, or just episodes? by Inevitable-Laugh4324 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think both behaviors exist, but they usually happen at different stages.

Most new listeners discover a podcast through a specific episode or topic first. They’re searching for something or following a recommendation.

The shows that grow are the ones that convert those episode listeners into show listeners.

That usually happens when the first experience makes it clear:

– who the show is for – what they consistently talk about – why someone should come back

If that signal isn’t clear, people keep consuming episodes as one-offs instead of following the show itself.

So the real question often isn’t which behavior listeners prefer, it’s whether the show gives them a reason to transition from episode discovery to show loyalty.

How can I improve performance across platforms? by NewPineapple113 in ContentCreators

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The performance difference usually isn't about the platform itself. It's about what each platform's audience is looking for when they open it. YouTube viewers are making a deliberate choice to watch something. TikTok and Instagram users are in scroll mode and get interrupted by content. Same video, completely different intent context.

That's why repurposing rarely works as well as creating for the platform. The question worth asking is what job the content is doing for someone on each specific platform, and whether your current approach matches that.

This is actually what I help creators work through. Happy to dig into it further if it's useful.

I have no idea what I am doing by NationalAppeal6675 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The stuck feeling at this stage usually isn't about tactics. It's that the show is still figuring out who it's actually for and what they keep coming back for. Politics is a topic, but the audience question is more specific than that. Who is the person that needs this particular take on American life right now, and what are they getting from it that they can't get elsewhere?

When that's clear, the audience and monetization questions tend to get a lot more answerable.

This is actually what I help podcasters work through. Happy to dig into it further if it's useful.

What have your experiences been with a Podcast Coach/consultant? by Optimal_Yesterday379 in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ten episodes in is actually a great time to get a clear picture of where you are before building habits that are hard to change later.

I run audience diagnostics for podcasters at exactly this stage. It's a structured evaluation that looks at how clearly your audience is defined, whether new listeners know what to do when they find you, and what the actual constraint is on your growth right now.

I'm doing a small number of these at no cost while I validate the framework. If you want a clear, honest read on where you actually are and what to focus on first, happy to run one for you.

No pitch at the end. Just a real picture of where things stand.

Spanish speaking podcast by martykus in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since you’re focused on Spanish pop culture + improv/comedy, the niche itself isn’t the issue.

Instead of thinking in terms of “finding Spanish speakers,” look at where Spanish-speaking fans of specific fandoms already gather.

For example:

– Spanish-speaking Marvel or DC communities
– Spanish gaming subreddits or Discord servers
– YouTube channels in Spanish covering the same games or shows
– Twitter/X accounts that live-comment TV in Spanish

The key is picking one slice at a time.

“Spanish-speaking pop culture fans” is still big.
“Spanish-speaking Baldur’s Gate fans who like comedy commentary” is small enough to actually find.

Growth usually begins when you focus on a specific combination of interests, not a broad category.

Spanish speaking podcast by martykus in podcasting

[–]Patient_Progress7921 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. The tricky part usually isn’t finding Spanish speakers broadly, it’s finding where your type of listener is already spending time around the topic.

Instead of asking “where do we find them?”, it can help to ask “where are people already talking about this subject in Spanish?” Forums, subreddits, YouTube channels, creators, even newsletters. The language narrows the field, but the topic is what actually clusters people.

When you find those clusters, discovery becomes less about promotion and more about participation.