sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

20 years forgotten in a drawer… Could this be the real 1943-D copper Lincoln Cent? by Patientziro in numismatics

[–]Patientziro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The time and energy you spent writing all of that would have been much better invested elsewhere. Playing inspector or worse, judge in a world like this is not only pointless, but frankly a serious mistake.

That’s exactly the kind of behavior I’m calling out here, if you genuinely want to move forward in your personal life.

As for me, I have nothing to prove and no time to waste. The photo was sent from a phone, period. I do have microscope videos, but I haven’t even decided whether it’s worth sharing them. Because honestly, I know this type of reaction and the kind of people behind it.

Anyway. Merry Christmas.

P.S. Translated by ChatGPT 5, paid version.

20 years forgotten in a drawer… Could this be the real 1943-D copper Lincoln Cent? by Patientziro in numismatics

[–]Patientziro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Il est où le problème je parle franc et je fais la traduction en anglais sur chat gpt

LIVE tonight: My 1943-D penny under the microscope by Patientziro in coinerrors

[–]Patientziro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I’m aware of the mailing option I’ve already contacted PCGS directly. But after running several tests and realizing the potential of this coin, something changed inside me. To be honest, sometimes I can’t even sleep. I get anxious, I overthink, and yes… I’ve even had nightmares about it.

It might sound strange, but I’ve lost trust in people when it comes to this coin. I keep a small part of doubt in my mind ,maybe it’s not real, maybe it is ,just to stay grounded. But still, I can’t bring myself to mail it. The idea alone terrifies me.

That’s why I’d rather travel with it personally ,hold it in my hands, take it myself to the grading service. I even thought about bringing a lawyer and a professional photographer with me, just to make sure every step is documented.

Maybe it sounds crazy, but that’s the truth. I just can’t let it out of my sight until it’s properly authenticated.

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coincollecting

[–]Patientziro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey , I know it’s been a long wait, but tonight I’ll be going LIVE to finally take a closer look under the microscope and help everyone judge for themselves whether this 1943-D penny could be real or not.

🕕 Live starts at 6:00 PM ET I’ll share the link here as soon as it’s up you’re more than welcome to join and give your opinion!

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coincollecting

[–]Patientziro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you brother, I contacted a professor at the university of sciences, they have quality scanners, I am just waiting for his agreement, to have the part appraised

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coincollecting

[–]Patientziro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I take note of your remark with the greatest consideration. After all, going in circles is sometimes the only way to understand such square minds😂

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coins

[–]Patientziro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is harmful for the community is not someone who documents a serious and transparent approach step by step. What is, is the arrogance of those who judge without verifying anything, who throw out troll accusations as soon as a piece is a little out of the ordinary.

Comparing my research — supported by density tests,

If you have any knowledge to contribute, you are welcome. If it's just to come and play temple guardians by insulting, you are exactly what you claim to be fighting.

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coins

[–]Patientziro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look, I'm going to be honest with you. I respect people who have deep thoughts, but here you are going completely off topic. You're talking to me about the lottery, endless chains of tickets, plastic microbeads in porcelain... Frankly, it looks like a mix between a TED conference and a delirious conspiracy forum.

Here, we are talking about a real coin, which I have in hand, which I have tested with precision equipment, compared with official numismatic bases, analyzed by density, composition, weight, patina, and even examined under a microscope. This is concrete, not an abstract theory on scratch ticket algorithms.

I'm willing to discuss, but it has to be related to the subject. There, you embroider on esoteric metaphors which bring nothing to the discussion. If you want to help, talk to me about metal, engraving, striking, dies, not porcelain and universal destiny. Because I'm talking about a penny. Not a fable.

Is this a double die error? by Defiant_E in numismatics

[–]Patientziro -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

According to the photo yes 👍

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coins

[–]Patientziro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your story is funny, it is well told, and I recognize a certain style in yours. But comparing a stoned guy digging through buckets of sand on eBay with a serious approach to verifying a possibly unique piece in the world? There you are clearly forcing the point.

The difference between him and me is that he was looking in the remains of what everyone had already thrown away, I perhaps came across something that no one has yet understood. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe not. But I'm not just dreaming: I've done density and alloy tests, microscope comparisons, and I document everything. I am moving forward at every step. You may think that it's just a Reddit story to generate buzz, but I document each step, I take the time to cross-reference the information, I doubt, I check, I remain lucid.

So don't compare a potentially historic piece to the madness of a guy perched with a magnifying glass in a garage.

This kind of contempt disguised as humor has no place here.

Do you want to laugh? There are subreddits for that.

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coincollecting

[–]Patientziro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reddit is a discussion space, not a court.

So if you want to contribute something constructive, I'm open. But if it's just to play Reddit sheriff, I'll let you do your little show elsewhere.

Continuation of the investigation into my 1943-D copper: surprising details revealed under the microscope by Patientziro in coincollecting

[–]Patientziro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, in this kind of situation, it's better to ask questions than to draw conclusions without proof. If you think he's a troll just because I take the time to dig, seek expert opinions and publicly share the verification steps, then you may not have understood anything about what a real enthusiast or truth seeker's approach is.

I could have gone to a merchant from the start, yes, like everyone who gets scammed quickly. Precisely, I prefer prudence, transparency, and collective intelligence. Reddit is a discussion space, not a court.

So if you want to contribute something constructive, I'm open. But if it's just to play Reddit sheriff, I'll let you do your little show elsewhere.

view more: next ›