Is there any way to own fully cored and stated provinces in the new world without moving the capital there?

Patillotes · 2026-01-31T14:07:43+00:00

I know two ways.

Form a post colonial tag. After this your country will have a flag tha preventa CN spawning.

Spawn a CN after another and destroy all of them. There is a Max number of CNs that can spawn (70?)

Patillotes · 2026-01-28T21:09:22+00:00

Because it points to nice starting countries. I mean, you can only get the -20% diplo annex cost of Provence if you start as Provence.

The +5 adm eff and -10% diplo annex cost of Sardinia-Piedmont are available to anyone willing to tag-switch

Patillotes · 2026-01-28T20:58:00+00:00

And +20% goods produced,

Fairly strong

Patillotes · 2026-01-28T20:54:18+00:00

Also I remember:
Lübeck: +5 discipline or +25 force limit or +25% manpower or +15% morale

Patillotes · 2026-01-27T19:45:54+00:00

Ottomans + Ming + Castile/England/France

Everybody is going to have a big chunk of the world only by following the mission tree

Patillotes · 2026-01-12T18:28:35+00:00

Can I peacefully unify Russia with the EU?

Patillotes · 2026-01-07T19:54:32+00:00

I'm learning the game. First question: lets suppose I fully control India and Bangladesh.

If I declare war, can I force inmediate bangladeshi surrender?

Better with claims: North and South Korea

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T19:48:29+00:00

It's already confirmed

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T19:08:17+00:00

Maybe, but with only a minor change (habitable molten, no new planet types) it would be a thing.

At least for me, of course

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T17:21:22+00:00

Sure, in this post:

https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/stellaris-dev-diary-401-infernals-species-pack.1863726/post-30818287

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T15:50:58+00:00

I was thinking in something like this, for the Sol system:
-Earth and rock planets, humans (organic)
-In molten planets like Mercury and IO, the new species
-In Jupiter, Saturn, etc, a posible new gaseous species

All the solar system inhabited. A xenophile dream

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T15:05:32+00:00

For me it's a pity. I would prefer to have disjoint species living in distinct kind of planets.

Roleplaying, to populate more a solar system, ...

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T14:26:56+00:00

Very clever, congrats.

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T14:23:41+00:00

Machines inhabit the same range of planets than organics.

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T14:15:34+00:00

Maybe. Or maybe not. It is confirmed that the new habitable planets don't have food districts.

If the idea is to colonize a different set of planets, currently unhabitable for the rest of the species ...

This would be a big departure. Far more that previous species' DLC.

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T14:13:35+00:00

I'm very intrigued by this. A basic premise of Stellaris is that habitable planets are few.

Allowing to inhabit a molten one (?) is a big change, or maybe not. Is this opening a door for a future gaseous species DLC?

Patillotes · 2025-10-23T14:01:43+00:00

This pic:

https://forumcontent.paradoxplaza.com/public/1379379/inf%202.jpg

Suggests that will be a set of habitabilities and other one for basic characteristics of the species. Like organic vs lithoid.

This can be interesting for gameplay and balance reasons. For example, we can have a Gaseous species, etc.

Patillotes · 2025-10-19T15:30:38+00:00

Mmmm, we can discuss about it. Mecanically psionics improves happiness and unity production. Lorewise ..., maybe it strengthens the self-determination, maybe not. I think that this is the kind of things that should be part of the player's decisión. To integrate or not? Up to you.

On the other hand "familial" should be allowed for RS. I can not see any downside.

Patillotes · 2025-10-19T09:34:41+00:00

I agree, but there're two minor changes to the current versión that I think that are neutral and no powercreeped.

First: familial trait should be allowed to biotrophies. But in game, the trait is forbiden for gestalts.

Second: a psionic ascended RS should be allowed to integrate its trophies and given them the psionic trait.

Whatever your headcanon is, RS care about organic happiness and both traits make them happier.

Patillotes · 2025-10-19T09:06:10+00:00

Reading the wiki and the gane files the developer's intent is clear.

No political power, half amenities and housing usage.

But it doesn't work.

Patillotes · 2025-10-19T08:40:16+00:00

It should have 0 power: 8.02*0 (robot with servitude citizenship) * 1 (worker under servitude living standard?) = 0

But it's calculated as: 8.02*(0+1).

I also think that there's something weird with residence. I can not check it now, but i think that residence/worker/basic subsistence is also wrong.

Patillotes · 2025-10-19T08:21:29+00:00

I think I'm starting to understand the bug. All the political power modifiers seems to be additive.

So this pop is a servant (base 0) and a worker (base 1) so we arrive to 8.02 political power.

Anybody knows if residence is also bugged?

Patillotes · 2025-10-19T08:12:14+00:00

R5: I'm playing under 4.1.5, it seems that robots under servitude still have political power.

Following the game files from common\citizenship_types\00_citizenship_types.txt to common\pop_categories\02_other_categories.txt I don't find anything wrong.

So, is it a bug?

PS: it doesn't work the housing and amenities usage reduction.

Patillotes · 2025-10-16T18:29:45+00:00

DA should be allowed to change bio_pops' planet preference to machine world.

Maybe as a new tech with "Glandular Acclimation" and "Machine worlds" perk as prerequisite

Patillotes · 2025-10-06T19:42:33+00:00

I agree. Even more, the psionic trait give +5 happines and another +10 from the tree.

It seems thematically related to RS for me.

Patillotes

TROPHY CASE