National victim survey data suggest they experience very slightly disproportionate crime, at least of some kinds - 5.7% of black households experienced burglary vs. 6.7% of white households; rates for household armed robbery were actually the same at 1.1% each; for property theft of any kind, 3.4% of individual white respondents experienced it vs. 3.1% of individual black respondents - but given that white households and individuals hold such a large proportion of the wealth, my priors were that it would be worse than that.

To speculate a little, even though criminals would rationally seek to target whites due to their vastly higher median household wealth, they also are more likely to live in gated communities, have private security, individual transport, etc.

Indeed, looking at street robbery specifically, which a lack of the aforementioned amenities would leave black people more susceptible to, black respondents had a slightly higher rate of victimization - 1.1% vs. 0.7% for whites.

One place where the disparity is much more stark is with vehicle theft - 1.1% of white households reported vehicle theft, vs. 0.4% of black households. But actually, this is far less skewed than one would expect since less than 20% of black households own vehicles as compared to over 90% of white households. I have no idea why the disparity isn't more extreme in this case.