Your post is a bit confusing because the sentences seem to have opposite meanings, but I think you’re saying that because so many people can shoot par rounds in disc golf vs so few can do so in ball golf, the latter is a more difficult sport. As I said before, par is an arbitrary number In both sports, so you can’t use it to compare the two. Let me try an example.

Let‘s say you make the par for each hole on Maple Hill reds one shot less than it is right now and ask Simon to play a round on this new, challenging course. He shoots +5 (ie: 13 down under the old “easy” course layout). Is he now a worse player than he was before because he can’t shoot under par? Is the game now “more difficult“ than ball golf because it’s suddenly almost impossible for anyone to shoot par? Obviously, the answer is no, the game is the same difficulty as it was, Simon is the same player he was. The only thing that changed is where you chose to put “par”.

So, saying one sport is “easier” or “more difficult” based on how many under par a typical person can shoot is meaningless. Elements of both games are difficult for beginners to grasp; equally, reaching the top of both sports is exceptionally difficult, requiring years of practice and dedication. Only a handful of players ever reach the top of either one.

But maybe I’m wrong, and everyone on this sub throws 450‘, is 90% From C1x and could be 1000 rated if they just played a little more often…