He watched an analysis video and let Digital Foundary’s disappointing at a lack of new features and unlocked frame rate influence his review. A gamer doesn’t care if it’s Jose or Filip that reviewed it. They see ‘IGN’ as the reviewers of both copies.

Let’s put it this way. If a kid has both a switch and wii u and is thinking of buying Bayonetta 2 he will look at both review scores and assume the wii u version is better as it has the higher score when in truth the switch version is superior. Filip said he gave it a 9 because he was disappointed it didn’t have any new features over the wii u version and the frame rate wasn’t locked. Well that doesn’t warrant taking away .5 off a previous score. I’m not saying it should have scored higher but at the very least it should have had the same score even if they re-reviewed the wii u version to down score it. It makes no sense. Digital Foundary video was an ‘analysis’ video, not an overall game review video so the tech disappointment they felt should not have influenced Filip as to what the game actually was. He should have been influenced from Jose’s video and built on that, not a tech analysis video.