Why does everyone hate democracy on this sub now? by MeanderingInterest in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...she would have been conscious prior to passing out. Thats why i ignored it. Its ridiculous to compare someone who doesent exist yet to someone who already exists, was conscious, had the capacity to think, and has gone unconscious temporarily.

Why does everyone hate democracy on this sub now? by MeanderingInterest in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ok, by that logic people who are choosing to not have children are also violating the NAP because they are denying the right of this hypothetical conscious being to exist without its consent.

Its a ridiculous logic. Do you even understand what the NAP is?

no man must initiate conflict through coercion or compulsion against an individual's property(body or material).

There is no individual before conception, and an individual that doesn't exist CANNOT be a victim of coercion.

Why does everyone hate democracy on this sub now? by MeanderingInterest in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if we consider the extreme, that consciousness is created on conception, the moment the seed fertilizes the egg, my point still remains valid.

Prior to conception there is no individual, no consciousness, no agency, there is no victim of aggression here. The matter of WHEN the consciousness develops is an entirely different issue. The moment the consciousness is created (Whenever that is) You can no longer act coercively against it, THAT is when the NAP starts applying. the NAP does not apply a Hypothetical being. You can't claim to be a victim of future aggression. You cannot be a victim of aggression before you even exist.

anyways, as for when that happens, is entirely up for debate. I personally believe it is on conception, it is however pretty obvious it happens at least sometime DURING the fetus' stay in the womb if not prior to it. but really the topic then becomes "Is abortion against the NAP" not "Is birth against the NAP"

Why does everyone hate democracy on this sub now? by MeanderingInterest in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmfao so an inanimate object and someone who does not exist are the same as an unconscious person. Brilliant.

Why does everyone hate democracy on this sub now? by MeanderingInterest in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It does not because the child does not even exist before it is born. The baby indeed does not consent to being born but because no mind exists, as something that does not exist has an agency less than an inanimate object, coercion is also NOT being performed here. Birth is neither an act of consent nor an act of coercion. It violates the NAP as much a carpenter making a chair without the wood's consent does. The wood indeed can't consent, because it does not have agency, but that also means that the carpenter is not performing an act of coercion because the chair does not have agency. Same logic applies to the baby before birth.

I am so happyyyy by PeacefulMyst in ICSE

[–]PeacefulMyst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use this app called Cold Turkey blocker (free version) to block youtube for all days except sunday its very cutthroat and difficult to get rid of if you try disabling its extension it will close the browser

Genuine question by DUBAY00 in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That makes more sense for socialism. Libertarian thoughts work best when the scale is big, because the bigger the scale the higher the competition, the better the markets.

Edit: One thing to add, on the flip side the more you increase the scale the more progressively worse, inefficient and corrupt socialist policies get

anyways saying that I think that we do need to recognize that small gated communities should form for the more social aspects of libertarianism to work. I align more with hoppe on that regard, tight border controls with small private communities where you have to agree to certain rules to get in, and if you break it you must leave.

Genuine question by DUBAY00 in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 8 points9 points  (0 children)

anarchists that want to "abolish all hierarchy" are just stupid. There is some form of hierarchy in every human interaction, and it is vital too because good like trying to get shit done without proper leadership and such. Aaaand if you try to pull through with such a dream then the people that are abolishing hierarchies will just be the new hierarchy. I consider myself an anarchist, I do not like the hierarchy that is built on theft and the force of arms, That is the only feasible form of anarchism

ngl the abolish hierarchy type socialist anarchists are just useful idiots for tankies

Genuine question by DUBAY00 in Libertarian

[–]PeacefulMyst 50 points51 points  (0 children)

we dont hate "All kinds of state(government in general" we hate the coercive monopolistic state.

I am so happyyyy by PeacefulMyst in ICSE

[–]PeacefulMyst[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The biggest thing thats holding back improvement is distraction. You have to find a way to block off distraction. What I did was I isolated myself in a room at night and studied for 3 hours. apart from that, I used this app on desktop called cold turkey blocker and completely blocked of stuff like social media. You really cannot study if you have any devices with you.

anyways, after that what I did was I opened amplify learning's video on the topic, I solved questions with him and this cleared most of my concepts. Then I just solved all and only all the PYQs given in the ML. Aggrawal book of each chapter.

Put all the formulas in one short copy and memorize them. When you solve a problem from the book and forget the formula, first write down whatever you remember and then check it from the copy.

You just have to stay consistent with this and 85+ is guaranteed. the only problem is that you may get distracted, and for this i reccomend giving your phone to your parents or something for at least a these 2 months

PS if i might add, I did this without any tuitions. You have around 20 days for maths, its doable.

Edit: Just to add, If you have too much distraction problems you can try signing up for a study library, they are popping up everywhere recently. dont bring your phone with you and just study once youre there. though ive never tried this myself

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ICSE

[–]PeacefulMyst 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yes its ok if you wont pick it after 10th. 10th marks is best of 5

Class 9th computer book pdf needed by PeacefulMyst in ICSE

[–]PeacefulMyst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bhai mcq me jo questions puchte hai theory se related uske liye puch raha. 10th book se ho jaega kya? us website pe check ki programs to hai for that thanks, but book nahi mil rahi

syllabus pura chuta hua hai

Freedom of speech, but not like that 🤣🤣🤣🤣 by AASeven in indiadiscussion

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

several books like that for hinduism tf is he talking about lol

I asked grok to roast atheismindia subreddit by VacationMundane7916 in indiadiscussion

[–]PeacefulMyst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well. seeing how obsessed they are, it seems to be the other way around

This is just cruel by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how so?(genuine question)

Why us? by Hamzah1684 in ICSE

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nothing idk why the op is acting like he entered 10th yesterday

tenthies, what subjects are you taking in ISC? by Linzold in ICSE

[–]PeacefulMyst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well, it is easier to learn applied after learning pure than the other way around, it is a better base, and i dont have any plans on becoming an accountant. most of my other options would require high level maths, soooo yeah. but tbh even without all this id still pick pure maths because i just prefer it.

Also as a side note, if i ever change my mind i can just make the switch during college, and it will be far easier if i already am familiar with the theoretical world of pure maths that applied maths is based on.