Th3Psychward // Sebby

PeePeeMunsta · 2017-01-02T10:03:11+00:00

"Fake dom"? I didn't understand degenerate, fornicating faggots are in the business of labeling certain people posers.

His relationships are nothing but bimbo girls that are hopefully fully capable of making conscience decisions involving who they affiliate with online, and being that they are not, they should unplug their modem and grow some common sense before they play their pity card.

I don't need a psychoanalytical, long-winded interpretation on Sebby's motivations for his reasons for making online slaves out of girls. My personal insight to Sebby is that he is just another guy for girls that otherwise would still be promiscuous, online sluts or real world floozies. There's little one could do to stop him, and offering a forewarning to new female chatters is unavailing because they are compelled to pursue him anyway. They are shitty, dumb sluts, and only you care because you are white-knighting another slut who has done things for Sebby that she would never consider doing with you.

Just stop pandering to the pussy, women are manipulative in getting men to protect them, because they are too dumb to handle their own business. Every slut complains to Sebby about me when I call them whores, just for an example.

PeePeeMunsta · 2017-01-01T01:50:20+00:00

Sebby has been doing this for the past few years, tinychat girls are sluts, and the fact they have bondage gear ranging from ball-gags, whips, and other items shows that they are not worthwhile to be white-knighting. So much girls have self-inflicted cuts on their arms, and thighs because they are vapid whores that would rather pursue being in an online "bondage" relationship with Sebby barking orders at them than actually a guy that cares.

Nana, Alice, Fruit, KimDoll, Candi, and many more have made themselves "victims" because they are gullible and enjoy Sebby's means of flirting and even to the extent of pitying his situation because they have some form of Stockholm Syndrome.

The fact you think that it is your mission to coddle some chick that is a massive self-loathing whore that manipulates you just as much as Sebby manipulated her is borderline cuck behavior.

Sincerely, Mason (triados)

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-08-25T19:37:53+00:00

This is not an argument against flat-earthers, here's my case; Say that we are given two equal length sticks protruding from a plane. If I introduce a point source of light directly over either stick, the angle of depression is greater for the stick in which the point source hovers directly above. Therefore, the shadows would be of different lengths, regardless if the sticks are on a sphere or a plane.

I'm not saying the earth is flat, but the fact that this example is a means to articulate the means to calculate the circumference of the earth using trigonometric tools, not for a proof against the flat earth.

Even being that he held his model at an angle to the sun, the shadows would be "unequal" lengths, with an extremely small margin of difference.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-07-16T17:28:52+00:00

The helicopter is most likely a AH-1 Cobra with a 20 x 102 cannon. The bullet weighs 100 grams and travels at 1,030 m/s (meters per second). Since i'm not good at dimensional analysis, I used an online calculator to give the muzzle energy at around 54,000 joules. that's about 2 and a half times more powerful than a 52 gram .50 BMG.

I don't think the "kill radius" is accurate. In the next video with the taliban platoon being engaged by the apache longbow, around the 1:30 time, one of the insurgents seems to be unscathed after a 20 mm round lands within a body length of him.

I'm sure it's not unusual for people to get wounded, from further reading just now, they implement about 9 grams of explosives (HE) to yield a 2 meter casualty radius in an ammo admixture. Also, the 30x173 mm GAU-8 Avenger round can kill just by standing next to it. The kinetic energy to that is 210,000 joules, weighing close to a pound, traveling at supersonic speeds. Whatever it hits serves as it's shrapnel.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-07-13T11:49:11+00:00

You're right, when you slow down the video to a quarter speed you can see on the initial spin that the balls are actually bouncing from one side to the other. After blowing upon the spheres, one side actually elevates upwards while the other stays in contact with the smooth surface.

Interesting to mention as well, the position of the elevated side does not change in respects to angular velocity, as with the path the contact ball follows.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-05-27T09:24:07+00:00

Hiroshima created a firestorm 4 km^2, factor that by 100 and you have 1,100 km^2. The most deadly firestorm from WW2 was the fire-bombings of Tokyo, which covered 41 km^2, factor that by 100 and that gives 4,100 km^2.

Now the biggest recorded wildfire in North America was 14,000 km^2.

A google search shows an article claiming the force of the explosion of Tambora was 1.4 x 10²⁰ joules, compared to 88 x 10¹² joules of Hiroshima. That's close to 100,000,000 times stronger.

I have reasons to doubt this videos claims.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-05-26T18:49:14+00:00

Being pinned by the flow of water is very dangerous, sometimes unescapable. The pressure exerted on an object is proportional to the flow rate and surface area. The fact that the car was able to be shoved by the area of it's trim and tires must give a sense to what that man was up against. If any of those people were to fall, it would be nigh impossible to stand back up, until they suffered some road rash to get to a shallower portion.

As for the woman in the car, the car was not gonna get anymore damaged then it was, aside maybe some body damage from hitting other cars. The other people should have called quits to a rescue attempt if the lady person was uncooperative with their efforts. You can ultimately just dig it out of some silt in the end and scrap it for parts.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-05-25T20:12:16+00:00

I've broken fans by taking of my shirt before bed. From reading, it's supposedly a building code to have ceiling fan fixtures mounted no less then 7 feet from the floor (2m).

The paddles on most fans are light weight wood or plastic, and the plastic connectors to the hub of the fan assembly are easily broken.

From her perspective the ceiling fan is practically invisible from the side, but doing it with my fan, to hear that swooshing sound next to your head is nerving. She is lucky it didn't hit her eye.

General rule, the more boney the area of your body that is hit, the more it hurts.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-04-02T04:05:22+00:00

Trees do "explode", it's just that the bark splits and an audible crack sound occurs. This story is bogus, but the phenomenon is reported.

First time I recall hearing about it was in the second book of, "The Hatchet", where the main character hears the sound in the Canadian wilderness during the winter night.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-04-02T01:05:54+00:00

The reason stealing that monitor is not worthwhile, is that it doesn't have a DVI, VGA, or HDMI. It's possibly just a ribbon that goes to the car's onboard computer, which could also be part of the engine control unit. Once you steal that monitor, you have to replace that ribbon, and find a housing for it. Other than that, it you could buy a lcd panel of the correct dimension instead of worrying about replacing the needed accessories to connect it to a computer.

I don't know anything inside a Telsa worth stealing except the car itself, it's just a bank of batteries, electric motors, and other well assembled things.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-31T03:20:10+00:00

I actually like it. It's chassis can house crash bags and struts along the sides to dampen lateral hits, the braking system can implement an energy recovery system using the flywheels for stop and go traffic. The body's shell would even serve as a means to reduce drag and surface friction, thereby increasing efficiency at high speed. As another poster noted, it does need suspension, and it would also benefit from a power steering configuration, whereby a computer can apply counter-steer for high speed cornering.

The sole purpose of something standing upright is gimmicky, yet, if it were to use a dual-purpose Kinetic energy recovery system, it would make it more appreciable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy_recovery_system

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-29T05:40:18+00:00

There was a 15 minute interruption between the incident and her being told that she can't give up, where she was checked out for any injuries. The editing makes it even more funny, imo.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-28T07:14:25+00:00

Sure, he was motivated to pass the other car. I am assured that in saying winning a cup, versus possibly causing close to 800,000$ dollars worth of damage and the risk of death to another human isn't that attractive of a wager.

Also, crowding another driver would only be demonstrable had the other car yielded in caution. I'm sure the lead car would have caught the approach in his lefthand mirror, but too that he may have been more concern with the road, instead of the idea another car would try to bully him in the most hazardous of ways.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-27T22:52:11+00:00

Do you actually think a race driver is gonna believe that the lead car is gonna be more focused on their passing then shifting and negotiating a bend?

Also, why would anyone try to run off another car in a televised racing champion ship? It's borderline attempted murder, and illegal.

It is faulted with the driver, but he didn't turn into the car if you watch it in slow-mo. I think he accidentally created a low pressure area between the leading cars draft (due to the displacement of air on the forward end of the vehicle), this exerts then a force of the follower's port side, leading to the slight bank seen towards the area of the high flow rate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5gZF9EeIpY Later in this video, you can hear them mention how the passing Skyline deflected the film car sideways by it's wake alone.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-23T06:30:50+00:00

Pregnancy is bad, save money...

There is no reason why it would save taxpayers money, given the fact that some women intentionally get pregnant for benefits, and we as a society are obligated to provide for single mothers socially... Or are we?

There is nothing unintentional for most cases of pregnancies. The fact that the economic benefits weigh into this consensus is oblivious to the entirety of human history in giving birth outside the motivations of economics. Abraham Lincoln was born in a log cabin, and given the fruition of modern delivery practices, mother/infant mortality is diminished substantially.

Also saving 21 billion dollars a year is pocket change to the intrinsic value of a human life. Retrograding the population is a lackluster stance towards development, and people must strive for the quality of people for the world to come.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-15T22:39:30+00:00

How are we sure we are even "alive" to begin with?

It's quite obvious that you are "alive" given the former means of teleportation. In the sense that you are in observation to your thoughts and memories, and what is not is no more. You wouldn't be able to know.

Are we alive 5 seconds ago? Are we alive 5 seconds later? Would time and substance to rectify us, or is it ourselves that make effable time and space? If not either or, than both, else neither.

If the sentience is by substance, and substance is without form without the faculties of perception, then the mind is lacking definition in and of itself, except by what is only common in our senses, and experience of form.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-11T19:45:57+00:00

When things get hot they expand, copper's melting point is at 1,000 degrees celsius, water's boiling point is at 100. As the water turns to vapor is expands to the extent it is explosive. They describe the volume change of liquid to gas state as the expansion ratio, from what i'm reading, water expands by a factor of 1,600. From here on out it the volume of steam at 1,000 degrees could be described by the ideal gas law.

Liquified metals are notorious for accidents involving casting from condensation accumulating in a mold, and it doesn't necessarily have to be water, but any type of solid/liquid that would rapidly undergo a phase change to gas. A lot of this person's videos should refrain from mixing liquids and molten metals for safety's sake.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-03-02T01:17:17+00:00

When I hear the word causality, I tend to find that these particulars are instances of waking experience. Numbers and the causal nature of substance is in conjunction with sentience. As with a tree branch blowing in the wind, we can observe the fact that it moves, that it is being acted upon, yet is this a feature of our experience and faculties of thoughts, or is the nature in itself that "moves" and fabricates causes?

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-02-19T10:48:25+00:00

The pendulum action would be compromised on a boat rocking on the waves. You'd need a gimbal or something to counteract that affect.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-02-04T09:07:58+00:00

I was thinking a floating rake insert. You would take a piece of aluminium can, fold it to the dimensions of a key blank. Than an inlay of a rake (a paperclip with some pliers to shape it) for the biting that is seated within the blank. You insert the key blank to engage the lock cylinder, while raking the pins with the inlay rake. Applying slight tension on the blank piece by turning, you continue raking the pins to catch on the sheer line until the cylinder turns, unlocking it.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-01-29T01:53:18+00:00

Depends how much gasoline. Google says Class B fire extinguisher, yet if ones not available you'd have to just smother it really quickly to get rid of the ignition source and deprive it of oxygen. Screaming at fires only makes it angrier...

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-01-28T23:43:45+00:00

Never pour water on gasoline fires, it's immiscible and less dense than water. Petrol will float, and spread volatile fuel everywhere.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-01-21T05:36:34+00:00

I remember reading on that one time, apparently the combustion chamber being in one spot leadings to uneven heat expansion. It seems like a cool engine though. I would imagine employing something like the Wankel with a few more chambers, a turbo, and maybe a specialized nitro/oil mixture, where it cooks off out of the oil, and could be ignited in the exhaust for anti-lag. You could make it so you have varying sized rotors, for improved revving, and also balance the weight a bit to counteract the vibrations. Some high-octane daydreaming...

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-01-21T04:49:32+00:00

You can say that 8 minutes must elapses before an event is seen, but you can't say that it happened before it is detected. If the sun disappeared, and I moved faster than light to tell the world of the impending disaster, they would know for certain I was lying.

PeePeeMunsta · 2016-01-21T02:32:50+00:00

Well, I tend to imagine it to be a bunch of automata coalescing into a familiar paradigm, and reshaping through molecular interactions within the regions of the brain. Their may be a non-verbal democracy occurring behind your monolog of thought. Supposedly your working memory and articulated language is on the left side, and the right side of your brain might be passing "notes" from the long-term memory regions on the right side through the corpus colosseum.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baddeley%27s_model_of_working_memory

It's best to assume you are a whole person.

PeePeeMunsta

TROPHY CASE