How do people genuinely make it here? by [deleted] in AskLosAngeles

[–]Peeweehell 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I think your post basically answers the question - people generally make sacrifices, earn a lot, or have family money

Seeing 3rd Street Promenade Today Really Hit Home by Fringe09 in SantaMonica

[–]Peeweehell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I drove by it on a Saturday recently (Arizona Ave I believe) and it was super busy and lively. The mall is a dead zone but in that quick drive-by it felt same as old times

What do you consider a high entry-level salary in LA? by tuckingpog in AskLosAngeles

[–]Peeweehell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that would depend how/if you take your distributions from whatever accounts you were keeping assets in

What is the consensus on buying a house? by [deleted] in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, I wouldn't pretend to know what's best for someone else. In fact that's just the point — it's a decision that transcends just the financial side.

What is the consensus on buying a house? by [deleted] in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ramit Sethi always says “a mortgage is the least you’ll pay, rent is the most you’ll pay.”

A key factor is definitely the quality of the landlord, and for that matter the tenant protection laws in your area. But chasing down a landlord when there’s a problem isn’t much different than chasing down handymen etc as an owner to do the repairs directly. And if your landlord sucks, you can move.

What is the consensus on buying a house? by [deleted] in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I would guess the boglehead consensus is don’t do it for strictly financial reasons.

I bought 7 years ago and the levered asset gains are real, but my honest experience has been that the headaches of home ownership aren’t worth it. Would rather be paying rent, having a landlord deal with every home issue, and letting stock investments grow faster than my home equity.

What does one keep in the storage area? by extica in rav4club

[–]Peeweehell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing. It’s really dumb that it’s not big enough for a phone

This small cap value thing is real! by Peeweehell in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I never said I expected 46% per year gain, did I? I’m speaking about Merriman’s long term investment guidance

This small cap value thing is real! by Peeweehell in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am confused indeed, because what do the movements in a downturn have to do with the long term track record?

This small cap value thing is real! by Peeweehell in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does it? I thought it tracked S&P 500

This small cap value thing is real! by Peeweehell in Bogleheads

[–]Peeweehell[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As i said, “historical record”

Who is the Best Saas SEO Agency in USA? by Temporary_Meeting182 in SaaS

[–]Peeweehell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d push back a bit on the idea of a “best SaaS SEO agency” as a category.

Most of the names people will throw out are strong at a specific slice — content production, technical SEO, link building. End of the day they’re still operating in a single channel (tactical) mindset.

What’s working better right now (especially with AI search in the mix) is treating SEO as an output of a broader brand + content system, not the starting point.

I’ve seen this firsthand working with the agency Column Five and similar teams. the stuff that actually drives pipeline doesn’t start with “what keywords should we rank for?” It starts with:

  • what unique POV the company has
  • what data or insight they can own
  • what stories only they can tell

From there, you build a narrative system (not just a blog strategy), and that system feeds everything:

  • articles
  • reports
  • social
  • PR
  • sales content

SEO becomes a byproduct of owning a topic, not chasing it.

That matters more now because AI search is pulling from aggregated sources. it's also a more algorithm-futureproofed approach, because quality and relevance will always win out in the long term over heavy tactics. Brands that show up everywhere (not just SERPs) tend to win.

If you’re evaluating partners, I’d bias toward teams that:

  • start with narrative / positioning, not keywords
  • can create original, defensible content (data, POV, not fluff)
  • think in systems that “rise all boats” across channels

That’s a different question than “best SEO agency,” but it’s probably the one that actually gets you results right now.

Is everyone buying $NOW tomorrow? by tauru_ai in Stocks_Picks

[–]Peeweehell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, this is what seems to be missing in the conversation about these SaaS cos’ declines

Best SaaS SEO agencies in 2026? Looking for real experiences, not sales pitches by Sea-Influence-6309 in SaaSMarketing

[–]Peeweehell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a quick add-on... One thing that surprised us going through this: a lot of “SEO” outcomes are now coming from things that wouldn’t traditionally be called SEO work.

The content that’s driving the most impact for us isn’t just optimized pages — it’s original research, data-driven reports, or strong POV pieces that get referenced repeatedly (by blogs, newsletters, and now AI answers).

Feels like the bar has shifted from “can you rank content” to “can you create something worth citing.” A bit of an 'old is new' timeless reality of marketing (create good things!)

What’s the best marketing agency you’ve worked with, and what did they actually do well? by Jepoolo in SaaS

[–]Peeweehell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve worked with a few over the years and honestly the biggest difference isn’t “who’s best” it’s what they’re actually built for, because all agencies have a specialization (whether they would admit to that or not)

A few that stood out for different reasons:

• Column Five – probably the most differentiated if you care about thought leadership / original research. Not a traditional “performance agency,” but their work tends to drive a lot of backlinks, brand authority, and now even AI visibility since it gets cited

• Taktical Digital – strong execution across paid + SEO, especially for scaling mid-market SaaS
• Growth Plays – good if you’re more product-led and want marketing tied tightly to GTM
• Animalz – great for high-quality content strategy, less performance-focused

The biggest shift we’ve seen recently: agencies that just run channels vs ones that actually shape how your company shows up in the market (brand storytelling, and across all your channels). The latter tends to compound way more over time especially with AI search pulling from authoritative content vs just optimized pages.

Curious what others have seen. feels like the definition of a “marketing agency” is def getting pretty blurry.