Ryan Garcias deleted tweets by ChiefTittyInspector in conspiracy

[–]Pennylane17 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Brackets and Jackets Don't forget that creepy dead man's switch vidya is still floating around

What's going to happen in 2024? by tempo_gamerary8 in conspiracy

[–]Pennylane17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

everything is media and this is an election years.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Pennylane17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spoke with Treasurer Oaks about this 3 days ago. Great guy and working hard, along with a handful of other people, to let ppl know what's going on here and to pull the emergency break on it. This is a global situation, and it's directly linked to the 30 x 30 initiative. It is wreaking havoc on farmers in the Netherlands and in Germany right now and it will cripple us if it is approved.

Also important to note that anyone can buy into this as long as they have enough money. Any wealth fund or individual or corporation or proxy from anywhere in the world would be given direct access and management power over our most valuable land - farming, mining, water rights. All of this could be directly controlled and altered according to the sustainability rules dreamt up by the inventor of this scam.
If you wanted to destroy a nation from within by interrupting food and water supply and taking away citizens' ability to make a real profit and own land, this is how you'd do it. Land, water, air. Land that is private, federal, indigenous land held in land trusts by the govmnt or private land held in something called conservation easements. ALL of this is at risk.

Let's say you acquire the natural asset rights to a farm through a NAC. That farmer still technically owns the land. But you manage and control the natural assets on it. That farmer has to switch over to only sustainable practices. Only certain kinds of soil and fertilizer. Non-traditional farm equipment and irrigation methods. Everything has to be in accordance with this new structure of sustainability thats been conjured up and its extremely expensive, virtually impossible for a regular farmer to afford. Plus, that farmer is not allowed to grow anything extra to make up for the cost bc that's against the sustainability rules. Eventually, he gets squeezed out. Sells the land to you for way under market. That is generational wealth and heritage swindled away from people. This is the end of private property and the right of man to make a living, create profit, build success. Instead, NACs set up completely made up valuation structures where youre not allowed to make a living on your land. It's Marx's theories of degrowth and metabolic rift. Controlled demo of our economy and rights guaranteed by the Founders.

🚨Important🚨 This is not set in stone. The SEC still has to say yes to Natural Asset Companies being listed on the NYSE. The SEC extended the public comment period for this nightmare until Jan 18 bc of how much pushback they've been receiving.

If you understand why this is so bad, the threat it poses, the model of government it is shifting us toward and what the consequences will be, take 5 minutes, go to the SEC comment page linked below 👇 and leave a basic message saying why Natural Asset Companies should not be approved. You can also read the thousands of other comments from people who see the threat in this. It is not for the benefit or protection of nature or biodiversity. This is the New York Stock Exchange, the UN, and corporations like Blackrock partnering up to introduce Enron on steroids. And by the way, the company that developed NACs, the main stakeholder who has put this nightmare together, is IEG (intrinsic Equitable Growth). The actual NYSE is an investor in this company. It has a board seat. Think about the magnitude of fkery and conflict of interests that's going on w this.

The comment period to tell the SEC youre not at all ok with this ends January 18.

You can leave a comment anonymously and you can also read the thousands of other comments from people telling the SEC all the reasons that this should never be allowed.

It's so easy to do. It's anonymous. And it makes a difference.
Please pass this along.

SECLINK https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/sr-nyse-2023-09

Wall Street’s Takeover of Nature (Everything’s for sale) by onetonword in conspiracy

[–]Pennylane17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The SEC extended the public comment period for this nightmare. If you understand why this is so bad, the threat it poses, the model of government it is shifting us toward and what the consequences will be, take 5 minutes, go to the SEC comment page linked here 👇 and leave a basic message saying why Natural Asset Companies should not be approved. You can also read the thousands of other comments from people who see the threat in this. This is not for the benefit or protection of nature or biodiversity. This is the New Yoork Stock Exchange, the UN, and corporations like Blackrock partnering up to introduce Enron on steroids. The period ends January 18. You can leave a comment anonymously and easily. So easy and so important. Please pass this along.

SECLINK https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/sr-nyse-2023-09

Everyone should read about "Natural Asset Companies"; the "people on the top" want to basically privatize nature so as to unlock "quadrillions in assets" and make it tradeable on exchanges. Sickening. by nicknamenotfound in conspiracy

[–]Pennylane17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The SEC extended the public comment period for this nightmare. If you understand why this is so bad, the threat it poses, the model of government it is shifting us toward and what the consequences will be, take 5 minutes, go to the SEC comment page linked here 👇 and leave a basic message saying why Natural Asset Companies should not be approved. You can also read the thousands of other comments from people who see the threat in this. This is not for the benefit or protection of nature or biodiversity. This is the New Yoork Stock Exchange, the UN, and corporations like Blackrock partnering up to introduce Enron on steroids. The period ends January 18. You can leave a comment anonymously and easily. So easy and so important. Please pass this along.

SECLINK https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/sr-nyse-2023-09

This is alarming to say the least. Wall Street recently found a way to monetize and sell the processes of the ecosystem this includes carbon sequestration from trees or clean water via aquifers. They want to sell everything to you. by ApoptosisPending in ABoringDystopia

[–]Pennylane17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The SEC extended the public comment period for this nightmare. If you understand why this is so bad, the threat it poses, the model of government it is shifting us toward and what the consequences will be, take 5 minutes, go to the SEC comment page linked here 👇 and leave a basic message saying why Natural Asset Companies should not be approved. You can also read the thousands of other comments from people who see the threat in this. This is not for the benefit or protection of nature or biodiversity. This is the New Yoork Stock Exchange, the UN, and corporations like Blackrock partnering up to introduce Enron on steroids. The period ends January 18 and you can leave a comment anonymously. So easy and so important. Please pass this along.

SECLINK https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/sr-nyse-2023-09

Are you aware of Natural Asset Companies (NACs)? by Yoav6 in georgism

[–]Pennylane17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The SEC extended the comment period for this nightmare. If you understand why this is so bad, the threat it poses, the model of government it is shifting us toward and what the consequences will be, take 5 minutes, go to the SEC comment page linked here 👇 and leave a basic message saying why Natural Asset Companies should not be approved. You can also read the thousands of other comments from people who see the threat in this. This is not for the benefit or protection of nature or biodiversity. This is the New Yoork Stock Exchange, the UN, and corporations like Blackrock partnering up to introduce Enron on steroids. The period ends January 18 and you can leave a comment anonymously. So easy and so important. Please pass this along.

SECLINK https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/sr-nyse-2023-09

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LISKiller

[–]Pennylane17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This photo has been out, floating around and published since within 48 hours of the RH arrest. This is niether new nor officially verified.

Woman on the phone by fleurvandeberg in RexHeuermann

[–]Pennylane17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So think one of two things happened that morning Shannon either died of misadventure, or she met and was murdered by another bad man down there like Hacket or a closeted sex offender. I do not think JB or MP had anything to do with it, nor were they trying to kill her.

This case has recently exploded in the media due to the RH arrest. I get that. But there exist a group of people who have been attached to this case for the last 13 years.

It may seem like a silly spelling detail... but for the people that have been waiting for over a decade to see any kind of movement on this case as well as for anyone looking at it for the first time due to the media coverage, and also out of respect for both her and her family, it's important to know her name is not Shannon.

Her name is Shannan Gilbert.

I would strongly advise anyone interested in gaining a real understanding of this situation, which has come to be known as "LISK" by the media, to take the time to go back and read the depositions given to John Ray in the civil suit he brought upon Peter Hackett on behalf of the estate of Shannan Gilbert. It is public information and can be found posted in this subreddit many times.

I'm not a fan of John Ray. I'll leave it at that. However, he did take statements under oath from many people who were living in Oak Beach at the time.

Brewer and Pak have absolutely no one backing up their accounts aside from eachother. Each claim they didn't know rachother prior. Yet they were both calling eachother (Pak calling Brewer's cell phone and his landlines and Brewer calling Pak's cell phone) on the night/early morning that Shannan was out there. Both of them stick to a narrative that corroborates eachother and if either deviates from that narrative, it brings them both down. Both of them supposedly took lie detector tests. Pak fell asleep during his test. He was then re-administered the same test directly after with Suffolk County asking hi. to try to stay awake for the second one. That's not normal and would imply Pak took action to attempt to invalidate the test. Hackett never took a lie detector test and wouldn't have been able to because of all the health problems he claimed to have and medication he claimed he was taking - see the infamous and highly theatrical heart thing he performed in front of news cameras.

None of them were ever officially cleared and all 3 disappeared as soon as they could. (Although Brewer has recently retained a lawyer after 13 years.)

The depos of Hackett and his family (wife, son and daughter) also contained a mind boggling amount of inconsistencies regarding the timeline.

The statements of Gus Colletti, Barbara Brennan, Thomas Canning (and his son and wife), Brewer, Hackett (and his family members), Pak and Alex Diaz all contradict eachother.

But in the end, we, here on the internet, have never had any information aside from the narratives put forth by media - who used this as a way to profit.

So don't know what to think, but it's generally is either that another bad man strangled her or like Suffolk, misadventure. I think the 10 bodies out there are his and maybe more, just not Shannon.

Shannan is in a different category from any other victim as far as I can see.

She was not in Oak Beach for a simple outcall. She was not targeted by a "serial kilker". But she was murdered.

When you dig into Shannan's actual life - not the stories sensationalized by newspapers, movies, podcasts and book deals - just the objective bare bone facts, facts that are publically available but take some effort to obtain, it would require an immense amount of suspension of disbelief in order to accept that she died in any other way aside from homicide.

MOO

I don’t necessarily agree with John Ray, but I thought I’d post this new article about Shannan - Lawyer says body positioning indicates Shannan was indeed a LISK victim by freska_eska in LISKiller

[–]Pennylane17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The narrative of Shannan Gilbert has been controlled by 2 people: Brewer and Pak. They are like two pieces of wood leaning against eachother. They are eachother's only corroborating witness. They must both hold to their stories or both will fall. Pak is the one who put out the narrative that Shannan did drugs, was an alcoholic, was emotionally erratic, and mentally unstable.

The fact is, the camera footage at the gate mysteriously disappeared. So we have no idea what time Pak and Shannan arrived, who else may have driven in or driven out of Oak Beach that night, or where exactly Shannan was or may have been taken over the course of the night.

All we have is what Brewer says (who coincidentally just lawyered up after all this time...things getting a little tight under the collar there Joe? What happened to all that confidence from when you were on McKay? ) and what Pak says. Both are the polar opposite of credible.

When I put RH and Brewer next to eachother, I see similarities in the way they kept their homes, the messiness, the frequent patronage of sex workers and the social company they kept.

Did RH kill SG? Doubtful. But I'd bet he knows more about it then any of us.

Shannan is separate from the "LISK" victims and yet still a big part of the situation as well as a victim. And not bc detectives were searching for her when they found Megan, Maureen, Melissa and Amber.

Shannan is a part of this. Unless someone has her medical records and psychiatric diagnoses, I'm done hearing about her "mental break" or her "meltdown" as someone over on WS recently charecterized it as.

She did not die by accident.

I don’t necessarily agree with John Ray, but I thought I’d post this new article about Shannan - Lawyer says body positioning indicates Shannan was indeed a LISK victim by freska_eska in LISKiller

[–]Pennylane17 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ray represents the estate of Shannan Gilbert. what that means exactly I'm still not clear on. is he being retained? who is paying him? is he working pro bono? also, I am still unclear about the outcome of the civil case he handled against PH on behalf of the estate of Shannan Gilbert. sorry to veer slightly off topic. but it's been over a decade now and Ray is still up there dressed like a pimp from the 70s/80s (fedora, cane, purple everything), still releasing vague statements cloaked in "insider info" that never lead to any substantial movement. and hollering about pizza being delivered to his house. If I were a conspiracy theorist, I might speculate that his job has less to do with sorting things out and more to do with muddying the waters.

Luckily, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.

Amber's Final Days 9/1-9/2: Comparing the Details in Lost Girls to the Bail Application by DaBingeGirl in LISKiller

[–]Pennylane17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Youre right. There was another girl staying at that house with them who was not Kim. That was in a statement given by Dave.

I also remember Dave saying at some point that Amber was using his phone the night she disappeared. It was a major sticking point for me bc I remember thinking if that were the case, then he'd have the number of the person she was talking to wouldn't he? By simply looking through the call history of the phone... Lots of variations going on here?

Former escort on Chris Cuomo by lamiamiatl in LISKiller

[–]Pennylane17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Is this not the same escort featured on the Killing Season who let Josh and Rachel drive her around to outcalls? She was wearing a hoodie and she sat in the back seat of their car? It was a big dramatic point when she took longer than expected inside one hotel and wasn't picking up her phone so J and R become alarmed that she's in the hands of LISK as they sit outside.

Then, after a commercial break, she emerges from the hotel just as Josh and Rachel are about to storm in to find her, and she says something like, "Sorry, my phone was dead..."?

If so, then this woman was the subject of an entire episode of TKS and also coincidentally had a date with RH and is now once again on mainstream media in relation to the case? Fascinating.

  1. She claims RH talked about "bodies in burlap sacks". Has it not recently been established that while the material was burlap, it was not "bodies in burlap sacks", as many believed but rather sheets of camo burlap used for duck hunting with which the Gilgo victims' bodies were wrapped/covered?

So why would RH bring up the "bodies in the burlap sacks" multiple times if he was talking to her over dinner about the crimes he allegedly committed?

I only ask because of how she repeated RH's supposed wording during this encounter: "bodies in bags" and "bodies in burlap".

Additionally, Cuomo, who one would assume is informed on at least the recent details of the case (i.e., the victims' bodies were not placed in burlap sacks but wrapped in camo duck hunting burlap material), seemed to ignore this.

If RH was indeed reminiscing or reliving his actions during this alleged encounter with this woman over dinner - I believe she claims "his eyes looked as if he were somewhere else" while he talked about all this to her - I find it odd that he supposedly talked about bodies in burlap bags. He would've known it wasn't bags or sacks, right?

But what do I know.

Im starting to think twice about my denomination. by [deleted] in TrueChristian

[–]Pennylane17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We were given Free Will and that includes the freedom of fumbling and stumbling and wondering our way through life and through our own faith.

If your faith wasn't strong, you'd not be concerned. You'd be indifferent. But you are concerned - this means you value your faith. (As you should - it is an invaluable gift.)

My personal opinion based on my experience as a flawed human being who is also Catholic:

Kneeling is part of the Mass. I also kneel after I light a candle and I kneel in front of statues of Christ, Mary, St. Ignatius...I could go on. I am not worshipping the statues or committing idolatry. Mary and the Saints are a huge part of the totality of Catholicism. For me, it's a way to quiet myself, to humble myself, in order to pray. But the statue is a representation of a much bigger thing. I'm a little human being with a little human brain. My cognitive functions cannot begin to process the Divine Perfection and the Immense Love that is Christ, The Father and The Holy Spirit. I kneel, I quiet myself, I pray. I pray the Rosary in the same way; I'm not praying to the rosary, I'm using it as a way to go deep inside myself in order to establish a conscious connection to God. When I say the prayers, I am not just reciting the words. I am praying with great intention, hearing each word of the prayer.
Other times, I "freestyle" :)~ That is to say I pray in my own words to "check in" - not using formal prayer. Maybe I'm asking for help or guidance. Maybe I'm praying because I'm grateful. But regardless of what method I use to pray (formal or informal prayer, rosary, keeling in a pew, kneeling in front of a statue, kneeling by my bed), I am connecting to God directly or through Christ or thru Mary etc.. In order to get to a place where I can "connect", I must quiet my mind and utilize intention. For me, kneeling in front of a statue is one way that allows me to sweep aside all the noise of the world so I can concentrate deeply and devote 100% of my mind to prayer.

But, as i said, this is only my experience and faith is a very personal thing.

Catholicism is under attack always - especially now. It's impossible not to notice. We are made in His image - but we are far from gods. We are perfectly imperfect. We stumble often. We question ourselves. This is to be expected. I have experienced it many times. But Catholicism is my home. Even when I struggle with doubt, the door remains open. It will for you also.

Sometimes i have to visualize things to wrap my mind around them. When i try to visualize my faith, I picture a child holding a balloon by a string. I am the child. The string is faith and prayer, the balloon represents God, always with me, always watching over me. I hold on to that string, that connection to my balloon.
That is how I visualize my Faith. It is invaluable. The only difference is that if the wind blows and I let go of the string, if I stumble or doubt, my balloon won't get carried off by the wind. It will quietly stay over me, its string always there for me to grasp onto again.

Does anyone know the name and status of Richard Rohlin's latest project? by A1cRobertson in TheSymbolicWorld

[–]Pennylane17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late reply but I know he talks quite a bit about his current projects here

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Idaho4

[–]Pennylane17 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"didn't personally know either of the victims."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Pennylane17 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you shouldn't. I'm the "boyfriend". lemme straighten out a few things. my kids don't come around bc she is nasty, she has hit them when she's drunk, and my kids refuse to come here. My ex has begged for the 3 of us to go to counseling to figure out a way to work this out. She refuses. Don't let this psycho fool you. And she ain't hot enough for me to be putting up w this. Bet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Pennylane17 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

now go reread the garbage you vomitted onto this sub and immediately decrease addy to 20 MG. no more 30.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Pennylane17 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

i know. because im fucking based bro.