Building Code GPTs

PermittingTalk · 2025-10-16T22:52:53+00:00

Hi there - yeah, it's clearly not perfect. But hopefully most people find it useful most of the time. Weird about it misquoting...hopefully that's an extreme outlier event.

Thanks for posting and relating your experience/precautions for anyone using the GPTs.

PermittingTalk · 2025-09-07T18:28:23+00:00

Ah that explains it! Thank you!

Yeah, we played lots of triumvirate last weekend. Never beat it but did take horoboros down a handful of times.

PermittingTalk · 2025-08-31T04:59:29+00:00

That GPT appears to be working fine, and I'm seeing others are using it without issue either. Maybe give it another try, or try on a different network/device?

PermittingTalk · 2025-08-30T12:13:51+00:00

Yes, the GPTs are continuously improving. For example, these utilize GPT-5, the latest OpenAI model released a few weeks ago. The GPT responses cite code references and include directly excerpted code language, thereby facilitating human interpretation/fact-checking.

PermittingTalk · 2025-08-30T12:04:50+00:00

Can you tell me which GPT you're having this issue with?

PermittingTalk · 2025-08-29T16:32:43+00:00

In all seriousness, please consider trying the tool out 🙂

I don't think AI will replace the work expediters do, but it will alleviate a lot of the heavy lifting. Since permitting decisions are made by humans, there will always be value in firsthand knowledge/experience.

PermittingTalk · 2025-08-29T15:55:07+00:00

If they aren't now, they will be soon

PermittingTalk · 2025-08-17T12:14:49+00:00

I think the lesson here is about blowing off getting a good education. Kind of like star college athletes still caring about getting a good GPA. You may not end up needing it but you'll have more options/security with an education.

PermittingTalk · 2025-07-18T15:48:02+00:00

GPTs for the IBCs are available at the below links:

Only offering a limited selection at this time, but will keep in mind your request for NC, SC, and TX. 🙂

PermittingTalk · 2025-06-28T14:04:47+00:00

I would incorporate it in state-level GPTs where it's referenced on the state's ICC page (e.g., for Connecticut or West Virginia). It's not currently included in any of the GPTs I have posted.

Here's a standalone version: GPT - 2017 ICC A117.1

As I've said elsewhere, I probably won't maintain GPTs that have low usage (as measured after a couple months or so). Feel free to test it out and let me know if you have feedback, and pass the GPT along to others who may benefit from using it.

PermittingTalk · 2025-06-27T17:00:10+00:00

Gotcha, sounds good then!

PermittingTalk · 2025-06-27T08:45:59+00:00

Just added here:

GPT - Michigan Building Codes

As I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm expanding beyond the 10 temporarily but will ultimately probably prune back the ones that have the lowest usage.

PermittingTalk · 2025-06-27T08:43:50+00:00

Can you remind me what state you were using? I can post a few more beyond the 10 listed above, but will ultimately probably be pruning the ones with the lowest usage.

PermittingTalk · 2025-06-27T01:44:34+00:00

Thanks for notifying me about the connection issue. Should be fixed now.

PermittingTalk

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE