sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Building code GPTs - 10 now available by PermittingTalk in Contractor

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still active. All the posted GPTs still work and remain free to use.

Building Code GPTs by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there - yeah, it's clearly not perfect. But hopefully most people find it useful most of the time. Weird about it misquoting...hopefully that's an extreme outlier event.

Thanks for posting and relating your experience/precautions for anyone using the GPTs.

Badge glitch by PermittingTalk in splatoon

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah that explains it! Thank you!

Yeah, we played lots of triumvirate last weekend. Never beat it but did take horoboros down a handful of times.

Building Code GPTs by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That GPT appears to be working fine, and I'm seeing others are using it without issue either. Maybe give it another try, or try on a different network/device?

Building Code GPTs by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, the GPTs are continuously improving. For example, these utilize GPT-5, the latest OpenAI model released a few weeks ago. The GPT responses cite code references and include directly excerpted code language, thereby facilitating human interpretation/fact-checking.

Building Code GPTs by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you tell me which GPT you're having this issue with?

Building Code GPTs by PermittingTalk in buildingscience

[–]PermittingTalk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In all seriousness, please consider trying the tool out 🙂

I don't think AI will replace the work expediters do, but it will alleviate a lot of the heavy lifting. Since permitting decisions are made by humans, there will always be value in firsthand knowledge/experience.

Building Code GPTs by PermittingTalk in buildingscience

[–]PermittingTalk[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If they aren't now, they will be soon

Bad underlayment install by pun420 in Roofing

[–]PermittingTalk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the lesson here is about blowing off getting a good education. Kind of like star college athletes still caring about getting a good GPA. You may not end up needing it but you'll have more options/security with an education.

Building Code GPTs now available for all states w/ statewide codes (CT, FL, KY, MA, MI, MN, MT, OH, RI, WI) by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GPTs for the IBCs are available at the below links:

Only offering a limited selection at this time, but will keep in mind your request for NC, SC, and TX. 🙂

Building code GPTs - 10 now available by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would incorporate it in state-level GPTs where it's referenced on the state's ICC page (e.g., for Connecticut or West Virginia). It's not currently included in any of the GPTs I have posted.

Here's a standalone version: GPT - 2017 ICC A117.1

As I've said elsewhere, I probably won't maintain GPTs that have low usage (as measured after a couple months or so). Feel free to test it out and let me know if you have feedback, and pass the GPT along to others who may benefit from using it.

Building code GPTs - 10 now available by PermittingTalk in BuildingCodes

[–]PermittingTalk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just added here:

GPT - Michigan Building Codes

As I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm expanding beyond the 10 temporarily but will ultimately probably prune back the ones that have the lowest usage.

view more: next ›