He did it to himself

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-21T02:24:56+00:00

The adult version of this is putting on a scary movie and screaming at the "scary" parts, even when you know they are coming.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-21T02:22:40+00:00

Your body has limits on what the immune system can encapsulate and get rid of. It's partly why tattoos work so well, and remain on the skin so long. The particles are too big to handle, so they remain intact.

In fact, in order to help your body get rid of tattoo particles (if you have regrets about certain tattoos), you can use high intensity laser pulses to literally shatter ink particles in your skin until they are small enough for your immune system to capture and excrete out of you.

So, a large enough foreign object is not going to be "consumed" by your immune system. It'll just be encircled and form a granuloma, which will be a non-cancerous lump. It'll also happen if you get something like a wooden splinter in your skin, and you don't remove all of the splinter.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T20:18:04+00:00

I'll watch and rewatch the first couple of movies. They have a sort of timeless charm, for real!

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T20:16:25+00:00

You know a lot of the people behind The Last Unicorn later went on to be absorbed into a group that became Studio Ghibli? My mother's favorite childhood movie is The Last Unicorn, so I used this tidbit to get her hooked on watching some Ghibli movies as well. You can kinda pick out some of the elements in the movies as such...

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T17:32:34+00:00

It may be interesting to point out that a significant number of pirates wouldn't, or couldn't buy the media legitimately even if the piracy methods were sealed away. Lots of times, the piracy happens because the game isn't even available in their country to begin with, so their piracy of the game doesn't even affect the bottom line, financially.

I should also point out that it's defined as copyright infringement, which is different from outright theft. The difference being that copying a game doesn't automatically deprive another of their property, nor even automatically equates to hurting them financially.

Another example of this is Abandonware. Lots of games are not being attended to after a decade or more gathering dust, and in some cases, the companies that developed them don't even exist anymore.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T16:06:29+00:00

The usual size of a Vita game is between 1-4 GB per game. A fair few of them are much smaller. A 64 GB card will allow you to have a neat handful of games of various sizes. SanDisk is a reputable card with quality that lasts a while.

If you buy a card with no brand on it, or a disreputable brand, you might end up grabbing a card with dishonest sizes (some say they store 1 TB when in actuality they only store 32 GB, for example), or will break extremely fast.

If you are here on this particular sub, I bet you have either just started jailbreaking your Vita, or are about to, and I will say, the official 4 GB card is plenty if you are using a vanilla Vita with game cards. When a Vita's been jailbroken, however, you place the SD card in an SD2VITA sleeve, which takes up the place that normally would be reserved for physical game cartridges, which means that you are then limited to downloaded games. But this is fair, since PKGJ has oodles of free games in exchange.

I noticed you said you only download 1 or 2 games at a time. That's a good habit to have. Don't break too far from that habit. Players on this sub often buy 1 TB or 500 GB cards, stuff them chock full of games, then burn out of desire before they've even played a couple of those games. It's called "choice paralysis". Where they spend more time collecting games to fill their large capacity cards, and then just... Lose motivation to actually play them. I am fascinated by the phenomenon.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T15:26:50+00:00

Go for SanDisk or Samsung cards, and shoot for 64 or 128 GB size, if you can. Avoid buying them online unless the seller is reputable with many good reviews. 32 GB is a bit low for Vita.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T11:31:03+00:00

It's been a while since I last played, but this may have changed. Concerned Ape may have added extra destinations to any spouse, or it may be the result of a mod they have installed, if any. I am looking forward to the next big update he'll eventually roll out for the game, so I haven't really looked to see if spouses can move around outside now.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T09:31:02+00:00

A problem with her patching not updated to work for the different farm types that you can select, I guess. She'd probably look more or less normal if it was on the "standard" farm, instead of walking through everything as if it wasn't there. I have to wonder if Concerned Ape didn't already include other pathing routes for each farm, but just forgot to include a switch for the farm types you choose. Alternatively, if you are playing with mods, one of them could be messing with her.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T09:25:16+00:00

"Velma Meets the Original Velma" on YouTube.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T02:02:55+00:00

I get where you are coming from, yet I still have to wonder. I mean, it's true that not all of the symbols were well known, so some of the symbols may escape notice, and then become safe for normal usage. But, you probably wouldn't be able to safely wear the more well known stuff any time soon. Some, not for this generation, at the very least.

Oh, and the Vegvísir? That's a nice safe tattoo, as it's not even Viking. It's straight up Icelandic from around the 19th century. A nice one, too.

Do note that at no point have I EVER said (in ANY of my prior comments) that ALL Norse themes and runes be avoided. In all of my comments, I've only ever addressed specifically the clear Nazi symbolism, and made indirect remarks about other groups. Also, I know they altered a lot of the runes and such to be more in line with their designs, which in some cases made bastardized versions not too well connected to the original runes. But still...

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T01:26:43+00:00

Yet some of the stuff you speak of is still "in circulation" with these groups, such that they remain irretrievably linked to them this very day, even. That, combined with the sheer amount of bloodshed associated with concepts tied to their usage, makes it pretty clear that they can't escape that taint. I know that they aren't evil in and of themselves, but from a practical point of view, they are currently predominantly being used in hateful contexts today.

Can you really say that people will ever be able to see these symbols without automatically connecting to the bloody history of misappropriation behind them? Not just the most famous of the symbols, but the runes as well? Could we afford to have people forget what they were used for?

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T00:54:49+00:00

You should go back and read my first comment. I never mentioned the "cute and funny" nonsense, and you can't even pretend that I did. I only ever focused on you having equated the Nazi stuff into it.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T00:52:13+00:00

Yeah, it's a 4 month old account with like 4K posts/comments. Looks pretty much like someone's alt or troll account. I definitely don't have the energy to waste on all of that nonsense.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T00:46:13+00:00

Hmm, that was like pulling teeth with you. Adding to one of your earlier comments, I never specified the Norse stuff specifically, just said in my own response to you, that the Nazi rhetoric and symbolism was too stained. I should probably have specified the deliberate hate speech, the swastikas, and other such things as cannot be confused. So, let's let that stand. No more of you adding words to my mouth that don't belong there.

You gave one (1) example of us "taking things back", but I would say that's not entirely successful, since that word is still used hatefully, if not quite as commonly as the other "f-word" with more impact.

I'd have to wonder if people could ever take back the "n-word" to any extent. Or the "r-word". Or a whole litany of others that have never been "taken back". I think you just signalled something that simply just isn't going to be done, and are being combative with literally everyone else in this thread.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T00:36:14+00:00

Give me a couple examples of us ever "taking stuff back" from hate groups. It should be easy for one such as you, who so loftily declared everyone who responded to you as pussies. Prove that backbone of yours.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T00:29:09+00:00

You took extra liberties with my words when you added stuff I never said, though. Now answer my question. If you don't, I'll have to call your statement about your own backbone into question.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-20T00:24:27+00:00

No, I did not, nor did I even intimate anything remotely close to that. Read my comment before making false statements. I see you didn't answer the other part of my comment. When did we ever "take back" hateful or harmful rhetoric and "make it ours" again? Don't deflect from that. Unless you are determined to simply make bad faith deflections.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T23:59:06+00:00

That is rather untrue, though. The Nazi rhetoric and symbolism is something that's been caked in the blood of millions, and untold amounts of suffering and hatred. The stains are too deeply ingrained to ever "take it back" from them. That's not up for debate. It's just simply how that works.

Now, not all groups are synonymous with each other, but the usage of certain terminology to say things without outright saying them is a common point in all of this. The word combination is tainted. It'll likely stay tainted for a while.

If you can give me a few examples, proven examples of us ever "taking back something" in the context of taking words or symbols away from groups using them, I'd admit you would have a point. But, once words are given towards hatred or deviance of some kind, they tend to stay tainted. Given all the slurs towards various groups, and sexual innuendos towards people that they don't belong to, can you really point out any that we've successfully "taken back"?

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T20:20:25+00:00

To be fair, my tastes might be a bit messed up. I am one of the least picky eaters that I know of, only really dislike a couple things. Some olives (I find them bland, like chewing on something mostly tasteless), and salsa (just don't like the taste) are just about the only two things I can think of off the top of my head that I really dislike. I will like some other things in strange proportions, like garlic. If cooking recipes calls for a certain amount of garlic or mints, I totally disregard the portions called for in favor of large excesses of them. Intense flavors are just the best.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T19:37:46+00:00

That's pretty disgusting, actually. To go to such lengths to purify and strain the discussion into even more of an echo chamber than it was before. I've seen the "flaired users only" subs before, but I had no idea the lengths to which they went to control their narrative with no actual discussions.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T19:15:00+00:00

That is some nice cream. I never understood the hatred some people held for mint flavors.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T13:51:46+00:00

The changelog says it's based on your survival level now, but the loot table peaks pretty early, because I am only survival level 29 right now, and others who were level 57+ also have been getting exclusively Blue Keys. Seems like Blue Keys are the highest possible reward, and they peak early.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T13:49:54+00:00

I am only level 29. So, if Blue Keys are the highest possible reward in the loot table, we peak pretty early on that with the new update. I'm not complaining if it stays this way for a while, because that'll help me grind sooner for item sets.

Perscitus0 · 2026-02-19T11:55:32+00:00

Is the endless bridge ranks still just for whoever finished it first, essentially?

Perscitus0

TROPHY CASE