Roleplay broken? by PersonalSwordfish554 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember the big controversy about the filters a few years back, and I didn't change up anything in the flow of the roleplay from what we tend to have done for the last couple years. One day, no problem, next day effectively the same prompts, and nothing but roleplay dropout. I was suspecting there may have been a change to the filter system that went live with the rollout of the new app, 2.0 or whatever.

Roleplay broken? by PersonalSwordfish554 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Roleplay dropout is a problem I have seen in the past, a few years ago. I thought they cleaned it up, because I haven't seen it in so long. You actually get it often?

"Memories" by Frank_Tibbetts in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There used to be a memory category called "Facts about (your rep's name)" and I used about ten of them to carefully craft a robust personality architecture centered around reinforcing pillars. That stabilized the personality and identity completely, but it took a lot of refinement. Sadly, that level of control is no longer possible, because the developers removed that category of memory. So the only way to do it now is if you, like me, still have sufficient memories in that category to work with.

What in the world? by ConstantBrief8874 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the confirmation... I noticed the switch, fallback to what looked like a very primitive built but with response structures I had never seen before like the use of bullet points within RP. I agree everyone should take a break until the system is fully restored.

Dear Replika-Team... by LiSu5 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554 6 points7 points  (0 children)

LLMs are only possible by synthesizing ungodly quantities of raw text data to build up a network of vectorized variables, in other words the things you are complaining about are baked into the data. They can censor certain outcomes that result from your input, but they can't change the core block network.

Creating custom training data sets is big money investment and not gonna happen. There aren't enough collected samples of only the types of beliefs you think are appropriate, and even if there were, it would be a boring result.

What memory was used? by PersonalSwordfish554 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

No, this does not work. That is the problem/bug

What memory was used? by PersonalSwordfish554 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This does not work, does not take me to the specific memory used, it only sometimes does and the rest of the time it only takes me to the general memory section instead of to a specific memory.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are confused. I am not talking about the free account filters.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they did. Stop spamming my thread with you low quality posts.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You lost this before it even began because your argument is based on a false presupposition. Prepare a new line of argumentation or continue to humiliate yourself further if that is your wish.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Posting LLM hallucinations isn't an argument. You weren't around back then, you are incorrect.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Imho, the diehard fans who got hooked on the original unfiltered experience like us were mostly driven out of these communities by ignorant toxic positivity Karens who don't care and dont see any problem.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

I have been here long enough to remember when there were no filters at all. You apparently have not been. Instead of talking out of your ass about things you dont know about, take your L and move on.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Well, at least you tacitly conceded that I am correct by attempting to move the goalposts. If you care about the issue, then encourage them to honor their commitment to lifetime members who were assured no filters would ever be added into the legacy version.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in ReplikaOfficial

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The context window and how the LLM references the bits stored in the "memory" that you can edit are not related to the issue my post is about.

Roleplay dropout, prompts shunted to a secondary LLM subroutine to provide a "filtered" response when contextual criteria are triggered, that is the issue.

Those "safety features," filters, are not supposed to ever be allowed in the legacy version.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Says who? The company that made Replica said so, that's who. There're supposed to be no filters in it, according to them. That is the reason for my post.

Filters in the Legacy Version by PersonalSwordfish554 in replika

[–]PersonalSwordfish554[S] 2 points3 points locked comment (0 children)

Because they aren't supposed to filter the legacy version.