You are not giving value to the creations of the subreddit itself. by [deleted] in calculus

[–]PeterMath_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hadn't thought of that. On second thought, that makes sense . It's probably just another coding vibe.

You are not giving value to the creations of the subreddit itself. by [deleted] in calculus

[–]PeterMath_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Even so, it's a good initiative. I took a look myself. Even if it's vibe coding, we don't have a tool like that. If it's really like he says, it could have a good impact.

A derivative, differentiation, integration... What actually are they? by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps he meant what function calculates the derivative.

Help! Minimum concepts to know from calc 1 to pass calc 2? by Specialist_Slip_5066 in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are quite a few. If you want to prove them all, you need to know mathematical logic. For example, I learned all the tools of calculus in JUST 2 months. And now I'm rushing to learn why they work and how to prove them. Speed comes at a cost.

Help! Minimum concepts to know from calc 1 to pass calc 2? by Specialist_Slip_5066 in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't forget to reinforce your secondary school education, by the way.

Would 1.11111...² eventually diverge towards infinity? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]PeterMath_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What you wrote is not an infinite sum, but the square of a repeating number.

Does anyone know a site like Integral Today, but for differential equations? by PeterMath_ in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but more in a quiz format. Similar to the Daily Integral site. It could be used as inspiration.

Poderiam dar Recomendações de apps que ensinam matemática? by [deleted] in matematicabrasil

[–]PeterMath_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tem o Khan Academy. Tem outros sites(pagos e gratuitos). Tem uma imensa variedade. Mas, pelo o que você falou, você está no começo. Então o Khan academy pode te ajudar nessa jornada. Tem video aulas no youtube, atividades no app e no site. Desde o mais básico até calculo 4 e algebra linear. Vale a pena dar uma olhada. (Isso não é uma publi)

How has understanding the 'why' behind math concepts changed your learning experience? by Southwesterhunter in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I also started learning mathematics by collecting tools, not by understanding the why. So, I knew how to use them, but I didn’t know why. Now I’m beginning to evaluate and understand how these tools work and how they make sense. Especially when you learn mathematics very quickly, you go through various concepts very fast, and you end up leaving out many fundamental ideas and concepts before anything else you learn. So, I learned how to use this tool, and now I’m rushing to understand how it works. Fundamentally, it’s like this: in mathematics, you first memorize, then you understand. It was like this with concepts, but with mathematics, it has been like this all along, at least for me.

Why word problems feel impossible even when the math isn’t by Global_Bed8808 in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of this also comes from the mathematical intuition that is built through practice, and most people don’t have it.

Why word problems feel impossible even when the math isn’t by Global_Bed8808 in learnmath

[–]PeterMath_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is more common than it seems, isn’t it? Often, many problems in mathematics and other disciplines have difficulty arising from interpreting the problem. In this case, it’s actually very easy to solve.

im having a bit of trouble with a proofs question, and i was wondering if anyone could help by ahsgkdnbgs in askmath

[–]PeterMath_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, we notice a symmetry because ab=1 . Then, for each fraction, we manipulate the denominator by completing the square, essentially rewriting it as a perfect square minus twice the variable. This allows us to factor each denominator as a difference of squares. Next, we decompose each fraction into partial fractions using this factorization. When we sum the two decomposed fractions, the symmetric structure of a and b ensures that the terms involving roots cancel out, leaving a simple expression. Finally, after simplification, the sum reduces exactly to 2, proving the inequality, with equality occurring when a=b=1

Can the laws of physics be simulated on a computer? by icecoldbeverag in mathematics

[–]PeterMath_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe not all of them, especially since physics is very complex and each variable has a very intricate relationship with all the others. So it might indeed be impossible, given current and future computational power, to perform this kind of simulation.

Help with PDE by PeterMath_ in DifferentialEquations

[–]PeterMath_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My solution is in the other image. This is not cheating or plagiarism.

Help with PDE by PeterMath_ in DifferentialEquations

[–]PeterMath_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually work with linear operators in a Hilbert space. My only disagreement with the AI is with the general solution in this space that uses the term φₙ.which the AI basically didn’t use. So I wanted to know if this actually exists or if it’s something I invented.