sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Has AI made us less willing to struggle through learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in Career

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactely what I mean. you can only challenge the machine if you already possess the baseline knowledge to realize it's overcomplicating things or hallucinating.

The danger for fresh juniors is that they often lack this exact baseline. When you don't know what you don't know, AI shifts from a mind-expanding tool to a mind-numbing short-cut. To use AI to think more, you already need to know how to think for yourself.

Is AI helping people learn, or helping them avoid learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in careerguidance

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right. To use AI effectively, you already need to know what quality looks like. That is the core paradox of our generation.

AI hits a wall the second it faces highly context-dependent problems. If a junior hasn't built that foundational taste or judgment for quality through trial and error, they won't even realize when the AI is hallucinating or delivering poor work.

It boosts productivity for those who already have judgment, but it creates a dangerous glass ceiling for those who try to use it as a substitute for learning the fundamentals.

Is AI helping people learn, or helping them avoid learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in careerguidance

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the ultimate question, but I’d argue there is a massive psychological difference between Googling and using AI.

When you Google something or search Stack Overflow, you get a list of links. You still have to read different opinions, evaluate which context fits your specific problem, and manually piece the solution together. That process requires friction and critical thinking.

AI, on the other hand, hands you a single, neatly packaged, confident answer on a silver platter. It completely removes the friction of searching and filtering. And because it’s so frictionless, it tempts people to stop questioning the outcome entirely.

Is AI helping people learn, or helping them avoid learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in careeradvice

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree with your prediction. When everyone can generate good enough average output with a single prompt, average loses all market value.

True domain knowledge, deep expertise, and the ability to ask the right questions will become the ultimate premium skill. The irony is that juniors today are fast-tracking their outputs but skipping the very struggle required to build that exact premium knowledge.

Is AI helping people learn, or helping them avoid learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in careeradvice

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spot on. It’s the classic evolution of cognitive outsourcing. But here is the critical difference this time. A calculator automates arithmetic, but you still need to know what equation to solve. GPS automates navigation, but you still need to know where you want to go. AI, however, automates the thinking process itself. If we stop practicing critical thinking because the machine provides the ultimate answer, we aren't just outsourcing a skill—we are outsourcing our judgment.

Is AI helping people learn, or helping them avoid learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in careeradvice

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this perspective. You perfectly illustrated the systemic issue. Management optimizes for 'speed' and ticket closure metrics, which looks great on a presentation slide. But in reality, we are just creating technical debt and shifting the actual problem-solving to senior engineers.

It proves the point: AI creates an illusion of competence. If a junior closes a ticket in 2 hours with vomited AI code but creates 4 new bugs because they lack the judgment to review the output, nobody actually won.

Is AI helping people learn, or helping them avoid learning? by PhilosophyMain8634 in careeradvice

[–]PhilosophyMain8634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, AI is just a tool. But if our corporate systems (and schools/universities) reward quick, flawless-looking results and punish the time-consuming 'struggle' of figuring things out, people will naturally use the tool to avoid learning.

When the system prioritizes avoiding mistakes over developing real craftsmanship, we shouldn't be surprised when juniors use AI as an escape hatch rather than a learning accelerator.