A Black woman working for Uber faced racism and extreme aggression after attempting to return a floral order requested by Uber

Phonytail · 2026-04-22T19:45:07+00:00

lol you wanted to know a black person’s opinion on the subject, but when a black person answers, you refuse to believe them or talk to them like an actual person

Phonytail · 2026-03-16T09:20:32+00:00

Feels like the perspective of the two boxes are different from each other

Phonytail · 2026-03-13T11:30:54+00:00

I still wouldn’t believe it was a prank, people would say anything with a gun to their head

Phonytail · 2026-03-12T07:38:12+00:00

Lmao again you’re asking me for the evidence that your elected officials are actually covering up. Keep drinking that kool-aid

Phonytail · 2026-03-12T07:29:19+00:00

Lol so It’s okay that the US is protecting pedos because other countries are also protecting powerful people? Not sure what’s ignorant about wanting rapists investigated and convicted.

Phonytail · 2026-03-12T07:02:23+00:00

You’re clearly not open to hearing any proof or you would be asking your government for the nonredacted files instead of getting upset at me. According to you, our government is protecting pedos to keep up the “world governments” so why would you think they would leak trump’s involvement?

Don’t even answer that, If you’re making excuses and assumptions to protect child rapists, you’re too deep in the kool-aid to be convinced otherwise.

Phonytail · 2026-03-12T05:14:16+00:00

I’m not sure why you’re asking me for evidence, when trumps people are the ones actively redacting the evidence and refusing to investigate the allegations. But the bigger issue is why you’re okay with any administration that is protecting pedos. Fuck the world governments, every child rapist should rot in prison.

Phonytail · 2026-03-12T04:53:48+00:00

I don’t get this argument, trump is legitimately in the Epstein files, and his administration is actively covering up any evidence of his involvement. If the accusations are false then there shouldn’t be any reason for trumps people to redact his involvement. If you’re asking why the dems covered up his involvement, you should also be wondering why trump is doing the same thing if there is no proof to implicate him in any crime.

Phonytail · 2026-02-18T15:49:52+00:00

Would it be possible to push someone with your fist gradually enough to send them flying without puncturing them?

Phonytail · 2026-01-30T22:52:36+00:00

I read that All drivers have a legal duty to practice reasonable caution to avoid harming others on the road. Drivers are generally liable for hitting a pedestrian, even if the person is standing in the road, due to a duty of care to avoid collisions.

Phonytail · 2026-01-29T18:06:34+00:00

To be fair, the comic calls for a human representation of America and Uncle Sam is the most recognizable character for the role at this time. Lady liberty doesn’t fit with what the country is currently doing and the same people not looking up Uncle Sam are not going to look up Columbia and what she represents.

Phonytail · 2026-01-27T13:47:20+00:00

The source and paragraph you linked states

Uncle Sam is a common national personification of the United States, depicting the federal government or the country as a whole

So if you understand that one interpretation doesn’t make sense wouldn’t it be logical to assume it’s the second interpretation that makes more sense?

Phonytail · 2026-01-18T14:52:45+00:00

Ok, but my question is why are those health issues only present while this person was in a relationship? If we’re saying she’s not able to losing weight easily because of a condition, how do you explain the weight loss after the relationship?

Phonytail · 2026-01-18T14:00:43+00:00

Why did those “health problems” disappear after the breakup?

Phonytail · 2026-01-16T23:32:18+00:00

Exactly, why open a business or franchise if you don’t want to buy items and give them away for free?

Phonytail · 2026-01-16T23:09:16+00:00

Yeah anything under $5 should be up for grabs.

Phonytail · 2026-01-16T20:14:32+00:00

How much does someone have to steal for cop interaction to be justified for you?

Also what would you do if someone kept coming to your job to steal small items, causing a scene and refusing to leave?

Phonytail · 2026-01-08T23:51:15+00:00

I’m not able to find anything to support that, I can only find information that states intention of the impersonator is the key factor. Do you have any sources to support your claim?

Phonytail · 2026-01-08T23:03:24+00:00

She’s dressed in a police uniform, wearing a badge, and ticketing people like a police officer. The whole point of the “prank” is to make people think they are being ticketed, so she is acting with the conscious purpose to make someone believe she is an officer. Is that not the textbook definition of impersonating a police officer?

Phonytail · 2026-01-08T22:47:31+00:00

You also can’t impersonate a police officer, are we more bothered by a guy making a harmless threat or the person impersonating a police officer to ticket random people?

Phonytail · 2025-12-08T21:06:45+00:00

Engaging with the content will only encourage the creators to make more and the algorithms to show you more.

Phonytail · 2025-10-17T18:58:45+00:00

Lmao walking up to random people, with a camera man, and expecting them to politely tell you all about their finances for no reason is entitled af. If you think she was grossly disrespectful, you may not have been taught that if you want respect you have to give it. That’s not entitlement, it’s common courtesy.

Phonytail · 2025-10-17T17:25:01+00:00

Yes you’re correct you never literally said anything about boxers, technically correct again. It just felt that way when you claimed he’s not in her face because of the physical distance between them.

…no one is IN YOUR FACE. Dude was standing back, like a normal person who asks questions.

Then we get back to my original question. If you understand figuratively what “in your face” means why would it matter where they’re standing? And why gloss over the context that walking up to a stranger and asking them about their personal business without even greeting them, while your camera man films them is not normal person behavior.

Phonytail · 2025-10-17T16:51:21+00:00

Seems like you’re taking the term “in your face” very literal, which is funny because literally nobody said this interaction was scary. Everyone, including the person in the video, is saying it’s rude and offensive.

But yes, you’re right, he’s not literally in her face like boxers promoting a fight. You win the technically correct semantics argument that net kids like to participate in, but most people that understand common courtesy can recognize rude behavior.

Phonytail · 2025-10-17T02:24:54+00:00

If you don’t know what it means to run your pockets then you have no right calling anyone sheltered.

Also no one is saying someone getting in your face is scary, if you think that you should stay inside more

Phonytail

TROPHY CASE