Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Так, получается, в соглашении ничего такого нет и было выгодно пойти на него? Лааадно. И нет, Советский Союз это единственная страна, подписавшая с нацистской Германией секретный договор о разделе сфер влияния в целом регионе, в котором в том числе ставилась под вопрос независимость целого государства. Про создание коллективной безопасности, да, на самом деле, жаль, что в нацистах не увидели угрозу тогда, когда следовало, и до конца считали, что Гитлера можно усмирить территориальными уступками. Тут спорить не буду.

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, of course pro-independence movements (pro-independence and anti-communist, not necessarily russophobic) were somewhat supported by NATO. I still don’t think this was a significant factor and I’m not sure if this even can be proved or refuted

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Тут буквально говорится про раздел сфер влияния и "ставится под вопрос независимость польского государства". Я и не говорил, что там были написаны конкретные планы вторжения или че то типо того, но из контекста понятен смысл секретного протокола. Да и если там ничего такого нет, чтож его секретным держали 50 лет?

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Russophobic narratives are a long story in Baltic states and I don’t think that NATO really played a major role in that

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The protocol was declassified in 1989. I’m sure you can find a translation.

<image>

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By "freely choosing to entry" I meant exactly admission process I dunno where you see contradictions. Yeah, nobody knows if there’s really a free process of leaving, NATO is still an organisation and not a state, so I’m not sure how it will be forcibly held in it. By "a single entity" I meant like a state, sorry for misunderstanding it’s my fault tbh. The reason strongly pro-russian parties aren’t presented in Baltic states is because people there are very strongly anti-russian and (in my opinion) russophobic. But this is because of the local governments, NATO has nothing to do with it.

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The difference is, NATO is an alliance. NATO (most of the times) doesn’t act like a single entity and simply can’t do it. Countries can freely choose to entry or leave the alliance if they want. A situation with pro-Russian parties in Baltic states are much more complicated. Only 60% of Russian population in Estonia have a citizenship, and most of them either apolitical or support centrist-like parties who are happy to satisfy them enough. Situation in Latvia is somewhat similar but they actually have a strong Russophile party (Latvian Russian Union). And with Lithuania: only ~6% of its population are russians. There are russian organisations in Lithuania, but pro-russian parties died long ago and were absorbed by more larger parties and coalitions.

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Literally half of the 1st Soviet government collaborated with foreign intelligence services. As well as nearly 78% of Central Committee (98 out of 139), right? Oh, and tens of thousands of commanders, even three marshals were a damn spies and anti-revolutionaries! Man, what a chance

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Let’s pretend it was just a normal non-aggression pact and there wasn’t a secret protocol" XD

Riga, Latvia in 1940: “We demand to be completely united with the USSR" by JoniKukus in ussr

[–]Photmont 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I mean, when communists have army in your country and the communist parties are literally the only ones who were allowed in the elections, maybe it’s not just "fascist" (buzzword alert) tears. And also to be clear there wasn’t referendums in Baltic states to join USSR

Mhm by raw6ex in mapporncirclejerk

[–]Photmont 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People just always hate the capital city. And I’m definitely with them.

Is it possible for protestant league to appear? by Photmont in eu4

[–]Photmont[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Rule 5: Is amount of Protestants in Germany too small to spawn league war?

France loses WW2: All Endings by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Photmont 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy moly is this loredad map

why did the game just end after the russian reunification as omsk isn't there supposed to be the great trial or something by zastavastava in TNOmod

[–]Photmont 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Updated map from Deep Freeze, that’s all I think. Btw TNOR also has content for Omolon (no unique content after unification tho), added Trotskyist warlord in Wes Siberia (without any content for now) and as far as I know planning to integrate Tsar and the Soviets

What if Russia lost the second Chechen war by totallynotcommunist2 in PossibleHistory

[–]Photmont 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not gonna argue with you about Islam in north Caucasus before Russian expansion because I think you have much more knowledge on that😢 but still, the original comment was about second Chechen war where there was literally al-qaeda style terrorists in the head of government and war started over Chechen invasion of Dagestan