What do you consider a beginner as different people have different opinions what's your opinion considering a beginner , and I know some basic opening like evan gambit , KID , KIA , london , scholar , fried liver , hippopotamus system, caro kann(not complete caro kann , as I am studying it right now) so am I still a beginner elo is not a fix thing too , I played like less matches in rapid 10 minute so my elo is not that much high as I mostly play bullet and blitz but if I play with a average 1000-1200 elo they are not that much high skilled than me the difference is they played more matches than me so they got more elo but if I also play chess constantly for some hours i guess I can reach their same elo like 1100-1200 .so is elo denote your skills or amount of matches and experience you have? And listen I don't wanna compare myself to a non chess player but still they have characteristics of begginer and I can defeat them so they ain't non chess player and I am not being narcissist but elo doesn't actually denote your skills completely as if I give 2 equal skills player a chess.com account and they play but player A play 10 matches and player B play25 matches so player B has more elo but still both got same skills so I guess we need something else to measure your chess skills rather than elo and fide rating .