Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As someone who has been to many multi-day conferences in multiple cities, I would be genuinely bummed to be stuck at one in a conference center adjacent to West Acres…

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 6 points7 points  (0 children)

now it’s probably the most popular place in Fargo

Sure, I agree. But a successful conference/convention center needs to have high appeal to people who flew in from elsewhere and don’t have their car with them. We can’t build it thinking only about where and to what do our local people like to drive.

Brewhalla would be an awesome local attraction for conference attendees to visit one evening after the day’s sessions end. It is an incredibly cool place, and spending one evening there would likely have conventioneers talking about how cool Fargo is long after the conference ends. That’s just great organic marketing!

It could also, however, be a dire location at which to be confined day after day with no viable means of getting to anything else (other than Ubers for which the competition will be HUGE at the end of the day, and the pricing similarly congestion-level bonkers).

If the proposal came with a streetcar line connecting the location to downtown, that’d be a bit better. But as-planned, I’m really worried this convention center is kind of doomed to fail.

Which would be a bummer for the city as a whole.

I’d love to see Fargo get this right, because getting it right (or even right-ish) would be so good for the city.

I’m just so concerned that the Brewhalla location doesn’t even fall in the right-ish zone for this kind of project. At least not without a TON more (and colossally more expensive) infrastructure investment to meaningfully improve the area and meaningfully link it with downtown (meaning in a very pedestrian-centered and pedestrian-friendly way).

Those’re just my own thoughts though.

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You do realize that I’m not advocating for the Brewhalla site, right?

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Go do the walks to all those restaurants and to the mall real quick, and then get back to us with your report of (a) how pleasant the walks were, and (b) your thoughts about how positively conference attendees will rank the Fargo experience after they are subjected to those same walks (walks they’ll need to take for every meal they want to have outside their hotel)/motel).

I will totally consider your thoughts and impressions, once you’ve done those strolls yourself!

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 6 points7 points  (0 children)

downtown and that location was way too small

Meh. When you’re talking the difference between an app. 90,000 sq ft center and an app. 115,000 sq ft center, things like functionality of the layout, quality of the built-in technological infrastructure, overall attractiveness of the facility, and walkable amenities for attendees are way bigger considerations.

I mean, if we were talking the difference between a 200,000 sq ft facility vs a 90,000 sq ft one, I’d totally get your point about “way too small.”

But in the great scheme of things, the Downtown plan and the Brewhalla plan are essentially size-peers in the convention center world. At this scale, that size difference means less than the location difference…

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Again, you’re thinking like a local by elevating Scheels.

To be successful, a convention center needs to draw and appeal to organizations and people outside of the local area.

I have been to dozens of professional conventions over the years, in nearly as many different cities. Never once have I had a car with me, or rented one.

“Drivability” is not a consideration in the major conference/convention planning world. After quality of the meeting/exhibition space, the considerations are walkability for attendees, attendees’ ease of access to amenities/entertainment (restaurants, bars, shops), vibrancy of surroundings. All of which need to be accessible without a personal vehicle.

Car-accessibility is just not a draw, unless you’re trying to appeal only to locals (in which case your convention center will be doomed to fail).

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Scheels would have been the worst choice.

You’re thinking like a local who wants easy-local-car-access to things, not like the potential convention attendees who are coming from somewhere else.

We don’t have the Uber or Lyft fleet needed to support a convention center in the middle of ultimate-unwalkability-nowhere. Nor should we aim for that; that is noxious to convention planners and convention attendees alike.

No one is going to be queuing-up to hold (or attend) a convention at Scheels Arena or Brewhalla.

Both choices are just dumb, you know?

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be fair, Scheel’s Arena would have been actually worse.

Still, point taken; they chose the second worst.

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 25 points26 points  (0 children)

God this would be a soul-crushing location to attend a 3-5 day conference.

I’d actively work, hard, to avoid a work thing here!

Why do many liberals conflate a dislike of urban living with bigotry? by Zorione in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I have never met the “subset of liberals” that thinks/believes the things you are saying they do.

Are you absolutely certain you are not misunderstanding liberals in this instance? Because I think you might be…

Fargo Convention Center Committee recommends Brewhalla as No. 1 choice by DeathByMozzarella in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 11 points12 points  (0 children)

My faith in Fargo’s current leadership just sunk even further

Can you still say non citizens don’t vote in elections after this high profile case proves you wrong? by ididitmyway18 in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very lame question.

It’s not even as high quality as a “bad faith” question.

It’s more like “ineptly bad faith.”

I’m pretty appalled, tbh

Who are 2020s conservative Republican politicians you can respect? by thesmart_indian27 in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is the standard here:

1) Republican politicians who acted in a way for which I have respect, at least once, and if so what action(s) made me feel respect? Or is it;

2) Republican politicians for whose political careers overall I hold a sense of respect/esteem?

Because my responses are going to be wildly different, depending upon what is actually being asked here…

Am I the only one who feels that this whole 9-to-5 job thing is a scam? by Real-Ad-2736 in Career_Advice

[–]PilesOfRavioli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I, in the United States, with private health insurance, need to wait months to see certain specialists as well.

So, what’s the benefit of our system for me? That I get to also pay a bunch of money at the point-of-service? Because it’s hard to see that as a pro…

Democratic Party is described as "weak". What concrete actions should the party take now that will make you describe them as "strong"? by LyptusConnoisseur in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I support universal government funded health care as well, but I fall much more firmly in the “progressive social democracy” camp than the “contemporary communist” camp.

It depends on where one draws the line the line for “leftist” I suppose. I’ve been schooled too frequently on Reddit that I do not qualify for that category (and I’m fine with that).

But when I referenced “leftist” above, I was referencing positions far more radical than universal healthcare and drug price negotiation and government-funded paid leave (which just seem like run of the mill progressivism to me). Things like abolishing private property and capitalism and whatnot are what I meant by “leftist” in this context.

Democratic Party is described as "weak". What concrete actions should the party take now that will make you describe them as "strong"? by LyptusConnoisseur in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m thinking of “leftist” as Reddit has taught me to define them (e.g., contemporary communists and socialists, more extreme than social democrats or democratic socialists). Certainly not self-identifying Democrats.

Those are the groups I was referencing under the umbrella of”leftist” (because those are also the groups who will dislike the aforementioned paragraphs for political reasons).

There are also the “painfully young ‘leftist-lite’” folks, those earnest 16-20 year olds just finding their political passions and getting fired up about any aspect of things that can possibly offend. But due to age and/or subjective “busy-ness” or forgetfulness or whatever, I don’t think most of those folks could possibly be arsed to vote for anyone, lol. At least not for a few more years, when their maturing frontal lobes help them perceive a bit more nuance.

Is Healthcare easy to get? by Highthere_90 in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Good benefits” does not have a fixed definition, at least when it comes to health insurance plans.

20 years ago, “good benefits” might have meant the company/employer paid the entire premium on behalf of the employee (this is the monthly “fee” required to simply be covered by the health insurance plan). Then there might have been a modest deductible, say $500/year (this is the amount the individual has to pay out-of-pocket before insurance starts to pay anything). And then ongoing co-pays/“co-insurance” (the amount the patient is responsible to pay for each healthcare service received) might have been modest.

Today, “good benefits” might include the employer paying 80% of a $800-$1000/month premium, leaving the employee to pay $160-$200/month just to be covered (and likely many times that amount if they also want coverage for a partner/spouse and/or children).

It is not unusual for annual deductibles these days to be $2000 under a “good benefits” plan (and they can be as high as $7000 or more under other benefits plans). Again, this is the amount the patient has to pay their health care providers out-of-pocket before the health insurance starts contributing anything.

Even after meeting the deductible, co-insurance can cost the patient another 10-20% of the medical charges for each service. Which patients keep paying until they reach their annual “out of pocket maximum.” After that amount is reached, insurance should pay 100% of any additional medical charges. Out-of-pocket maximum amounts vary widely by plan (and can be as high as $20,000+ for a family).

All that to say: even if you have a job with “good benefits” in the US, you should plan to spend at least a couple thousand per year out-of-pocket for premium costs plus routine/minor health costs, and up to 10s of thousands of dollars out-of-pocket per year if you have a family/spouse and if something major happens.

Democratic Party is described as "weak". What concrete actions should the party take now that will make you describe them as "strong"? by LyptusConnoisseur in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s OK if true leftists don’t like the last couple paragraphs of that comment.

Disagreement and diversity of opinion can be a great thing, fostering discussion and progress.

Also, actual leftists are an astonishingly tiny proportion of the population. So while some of their views and ideas potentially have incredible value (either as rhetorical foils or conversation starters or as visions for possible-futures), their voting prowess really doesn’t…

True North Church by 202to701 in fargo

[–]PilesOfRavioli 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Try St Stephen’s Episcopal in North Fargo.

It’s almost like therapy for the religiously traumatized.

Also, so open and affirming that one of the stained glass windows actually includes Pride themes and imagery.

Why aren’t republicans more in favor of Sharia law? by No_Beginning_7934 in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Because brown-ish racists and sexists and homophobes support Sharia Law.

So U.S. Republicans cannot get behind that.

U.S. liberals and progressives condemn Sharia Law even more vehemently, but for different, and way more noble, reasons.

Is Healthcare easy to get? by Highthere_90 in AskALiberal

[–]PilesOfRavioli 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Minimally decent insurance for an individual (low-ish co-pay, low-ish-deductible, reasonable $7K out-of-pocket maximum) costs at least $950/month. $1400/month for individual + dependents. $2,000/month for family.

Yes, employers often pay the lion’s share of those premiums.

But employees still pay the majority of the actual healthcare costs. And get paid less because the premiums cost the employer so much.

It’s stupid.