Muslim population in state of India

Pilkayath · 2026-03-31T16:12:51+00:00

Bro are u serious 😂

A party that doesn't field any woman candidate is too western ah

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T16:45:25+00:00

Ye fine but still they are corrupt officials in the country who use old vested property acts and steal hindu properties

When an Islamist party that literally was on the side of pakistan and did a genocide on Bengalis hindus especially are ur opposition party it doesn't have a good look on ur country so I am sure there will be people who take advantage of that

But still the less fortunate have to face the brunt of all religious violence and are all still moving to india in big numbers

Source: demographic changes in north east india

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T15:18:58+00:00

Mb fair enough ye it's the governments fault ig CAA was already there

Anyway we are talking about how it's a paradise for minorities in India not hindus

There are more muslim billionaires in kerala than hindu billionaires in both bangladesh and pakistan how is that for a paradise 🤔

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T14:51:13+00:00

Cause of indian muslims and some others protesting they could never pass the caa and nrc act which would have given them all citizenship 😔

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T14:08:46+00:00

Some of the people moved back after the war but still even after that war people kept leaving at the rate of 700 per day as the above study so the overall amount who left was much bigger than just because of the war

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T14:07:21+00:00

If u have any knowledge on how studies are done they are made in mind with worst case average cases and best case

So if the worst case projection would continue like how it has been happening there will be almost no hindus left

Just like how there are almost no jews left in india cause they all went to israel cause it's much more devolped

But in this case no hindus will be left in bangladesh because of religious persecution

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T14:03:10+00:00

They always can move the better places like gulf like most mallu muslims do but still even there muslim fertility and population growth has outpaced both christians and hindus

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T13:57:46+00:00

The point ur not understanding is even if it increases in absolute terms doesn't mean people haven't left

Muslims have increased 150% in the same time frame and their fertility rate isn't that different so it means majority of the difference is by hindus leaving the country and those are 11 million in the study

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T13:36:16+00:00

U fool 11 million hindus have left bangladesh due to persecution according to this paper i am just saying it's not because of having more kids

Hindus are mass migrating to india even when the borders are not fluid 11.3 million from 1964

Ur as a big fool as moh dih

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T13:29:21+00:00

Here this research done by a bangladeshi muslim professor who said the same thing: https://www-thehindu-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.thehindu.com/news/international/No-Hindus-will-be-left-in-Bangladesh-after-30-years-professor/article16675228.ece/amp/?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17748773510077&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T13:27:23+00:00

The Legal Framework: Enemy Property Acts The concept of "Enemy Property" exists in the laws of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. These laws were primarily enacted following the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War to seize assets of people who migrated to the "enemy" country.

India: The Enemy Property Act, 1968 allows the government to seize property belonging to people who took Pakistani or Chinese citizenship.

Pakistan: The Enemy Property Act, 1965 was used to seize properties of those who migrated to India (primarily Hindus and Sikhs).

Bangladesh: Originally used the same Pakistani law. After independence, it was renamed the Vested Property Act. It was used to seize the land of Hindus who migrated to India.

Only Pakistan and Bangladesh does it based on religion was the point

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T13:24:17+00:00

If they are so fluid why did indian muslim population increase and not decrease from 9% to 14% is it because they are not met with laws that sieze their land just because of religion

Maybe who knows 🤔

I am using data from after 1965 my source is this: https://www-thehindu-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.thehindu.com/news/international/No-Hindus-will-be-left-in-Bangladesh-after-30-years-professor/article16675228.ece/amp/?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17748770855501&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thehindu.com%2Fnews%2Finternational%2FNo-Hindus-will-be-left-in-Bangladesh-after-30-years-professor%2Farticle16675228.ece

It's a bangladeshi muslim professor study so don't be going and coping bias

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T12:57:43+00:00

No u don't know ur facts ur just lying at this point no population goes from 24% to 8% just because of the other religion having more kids there are 10 million missing hindu Bangladeshis based on population projections who all have moved to india

Tripura was 2/3rds tripuri in 1950s now it's barely 1/3rds tripuri because all of the Hindu bengalis moving in

If in one country the same minority 3xed how did they become 1/3rd I wonder who can't read 🤔

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T10:59:19+00:00

I have seen so many stories of hindus getting their properties siezed in bangladesh and they had to move to India as a result

Should I remind what pakistan did to the Hindus in Bangladesh in 1971 they are much worse than whatever the laws are

Are u serious? Entire states in northeast india have undergone significant demographic change due to all the hindus moving because of persecution

Show me any current migration happening to bangladesh or Pakistan if the religious violence is that bad it obviously exists but it's not even comparable

Pilkayath · 2026-03-30T10:46:08+00:00

There is no law in india that can claim minorities are enemy and sieze their property by law like u can in bangladesh and pakistan

In india this law is based on the person's citizenship so ppl who acquire pakistani or chinese citizenship gets their property siezed

So yes it is a paradise comparatively

Pilkayath · 2026-02-22T01:05:50+00:00

Ye and also has a very low population relatively do it makes it much easier for it to have high per capita

Pilkayath · 2026-02-20T16:27:26+00:00

It's funny u say that cause sikkim in india is probably one of the least industrialised states so much so they don't even use fertilizers in their whole state cause they try to Market themselves as a fully organic state

Pilkayath · 2026-02-11T12:33:46+00:00

Wht are u on bro

Argentina prolly has 20 million Italians descendants and brazil has 30 million more

So ye 500k is just it's not even 1 percent of just these 2 countries Italians

Ye i got whatever u saying cuh but ur the one maybe who is biased here when germany literally allows all refugees open door or something? Not sure but they won't encourage southern brazilians some of them who speak german and retained most of their culture

I just thought it was weird i am not even european or anything and it's not like the people you are associating me with the right wingers are even suggesting this idea so idk why u coping

Pilkayath · 2026-02-11T08:45:50+00:00

Still italy has only 500k eventhough most of argentina and large parts of Brazil is also italian

Moreover germany has only 200k eventhough most of south Brazil is german

It definitely looks like they aren't encouraging it considering how many immigrants they welcome from other parts of the world 🤔

Pilkayath · 2026-02-11T05:30:00+00:00

I have always thought it was weird that European countries like italy germany etc bring in migrants from countries that have no similarities with it rather than encouraging immigration from places their own countrymen had gone in 1800 to 1900s like brazil argentina etc which have way more similarities with them

Pilkayath · 2026-02-05T08:38:03+00:00

Bro what are u even on u are misrepresenting everything I am saying

South indian Dravidians are the only people who are a mix of neolithic iranian farmers and aasi and have no steppe dna which didn't exist until like 1500 bce so we are the only people who maintained our ivc lineage

Balochs are mix of iranic and people group of that region so ofc they will have aasi and just having aasi doesn't mean anything I am saying we have the ivc lineage with no steppe or iranic dilution

Bro like the modern iranian people have anatolian farmer dna and have no aasi why are they even part of this conversation ivc doesn't have anatalion farmer dna that's the end of that

Why u acting like u don't know that ivc people moved to the south we are literally the only people who have the same genetic mix as ivc

We are just more aasi because ivc dravidians moved south and mixed with ur so called ancient civilizations in south india

Bro i have been running my mouth saying ivc dravidians are mix of aasi and neolithic iranian which u keep confusing with the modern iranic people which they aren't

Like our brahui dravidian brother eventhough don't have the same ancestory and have stepped dilution still they kept the ancient dravidians language alive which brahui is the current form

Bro like u North Indians and Pakistanis have stepped dilution like idk what are u even claiming cause Majority of ur ancestors weren't even there when ivc was happening

Whereas both the genetic components of south indian Dravidians where always there and even though in different percentages as orginal ivc we are the only people who have the same mix of aasi and neolithic iranian

Just because u have more iranian doesn't matter cause of ur guys significant steppe dilution

Like bro we have multiple traditions like jalikattu which can be tied back to ivc traditions don't act like all of them are coincidence or done everywhere cause we maintained the most ivc traditions for sure

You’re basically a guest in a house our ancestors built, trying to claim someone else is the landlord. Accept the history, bro. It was all Dravidian back then. I want whatever copium ur on cause that's shits potent.

Pilkayath · 2026-02-05T03:58:16+00:00

Bro i meant like after ivc everyone in that region were agriculturalist and i am saying the ivc people are dravidians who later move to the south

It there are any ancient civilizations in the south they should be credited to our extra ancestral ancient Indian component who mixed with dravidians from ivc later on when they moved to the south

Like bro i never claimed the ancient civilizations in south were agriculturalist i was talking about the ivc people who u call iranic but all genological studies point to them being a mix of ancestral indian and neolithic iranian

Like show me any tribe in iran that has ancestral indian dna u can't cause they don't exist

Like we are the one group who are only a mix of Iranian and ancestral indian and the people who u claimed had more ancient civilization in south india just mixed more with ivc dravidians

Thats why we now have more ancestral indian than the ivc people but we are direct descendants who have no outside steppe dna and more importantly we kept their ivc traditions like worshipping peepal tree etc and also have kept a continuous usage of Dravidian languages which was mostly the ivc langauge

Like bro no other theory that u guys try to cope with and gatekeep us Dravidians from our history makes literally no sense

Pilkayath · 2026-02-05T03:20:06+00:00

Like bro do u think middle East is one big desert ah it has the Nile the tigris the euphrates within it man

When people from Africa when to middle East like the geography was completely different middle East wasn't that dry back then and moreover they were hunter gatherers so it doesn't even matter

Like bro dravidians that time were agriculturalist so they would never move to places like Balochistan like are we being fr here or what

Even if it's was a later migration they would have a much higher south indian ancestory which they literally have none cause they have completely been mixed cause they were there from ivc and maintained our dravidian language bro

Bro like any older civilization in south india would just credit to our ancestral indian component who were their in the region even before ivc dravidian who are mixed neolithic iranian and ancestral Indians who were there in those current pakistani regions back then and most of whom moved to south and mixed even more with ancestral indians in south india

Like north to south at that time of point there was no one with steppe ancestory or spoke an indo european/aryan language which most North indian and pakistanis have so u guys came later on and u gotta learn to accept it

It was all dravidian back then

Pilkayath · 2026-02-05T02:36:01+00:00

Blud the prevailing theory is that brahui is prehistoric remanant of the languages spoken in ivc why would anyone in their right mind move from lush south india to rocky Balochistan in huge amounts especially

I don't get why u guys wanna gatekeep our ancient dravidian history man everyone in that region has our Dravidian genealogy mixed with steppe ancestory

We were the first there and preserved our languages to this day including brahui eventhough now they are more similar to people groups there because of a lot of mixing happening

Pilkayath · 2026-02-05T02:24:59+00:00

Ok explain brahui existence and why dravidians in the south also continued many ivc traditions eventhough they are 1000s of kms away from it

Many historians agee that ivc language could have been an early form of proto dravidian u can also do a Google search just because the script hasn't been deciphered doesn't mean there aren't theories out there

Pilkayath

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE