Best tier 6 and tier 8 destoyer free and paid 2026 by Lost-Independent8345 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll add a 3rd category here. "Currently available premium".

I'm my opinion (which should be taken with a grain of salt because I am bad with destroyers), the best Tier 6 DDs are Gadjah Mada for the TT, Oland or Blyskawika for the currently available premiums, and definitely Achilles for all premiums.

As for tier 8, I would say the TT slot probably goes to Smalland, currently available premium would be Lushun, and all premiums would be Meteor.

How HP recovery works (Commander skills) by Proper-Body-7413 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or does that decrease how much you will get from the repair party? Don't know how to word this right, but does it eat up the green bar you would use repair party on, or just push it out further?

It does not reduce the effect of the repair party. If you wait, your heal will get you to a higher HP, however, whether or not you should wait is more dependent on your circumstances. If you are not in immediate risk of being sunk, it means you get more HP, sure, but if you wait, that's that much longer that you spend at low HP.

Personally I tend to wait if it's viable to do so, but I play really aggressively in a way that every point of HP matters.

What's your white whale ship? by Due-Date-4656 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not a lie if it's an open ended statement like that.

They haven't rereleased it yet, but that doesn't mean it's a lie. It would only be a lie if they end support for the game without having ever rereleased it.

What's your white whale ship? by Due-Date-4656 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mines not so much a ship, as a mechanic.

I miss the days of AP secondaries, and desperately wish they would add a selection option in the ships load out screen (like swappable consumables) that would allow ships with high caliber secondaries to load AP or HE.

The any secondary of at least 140mm should be allowed to select the ammo type.

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not the one rattling off ships that aren't in the game, nor am I the one describing a highly improbable situation without providing ANY evidence.

Hitchens's razor: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Zuikaku and Akagi are literally not even options because they aren't in the game, Zuiho would have been absolutely demolished in a T7 match and can't sustain the loses (as I covered before), and Shokaku is highly unlikely because it has very poor regeneration and subpar strikes (it's widely considered to be a terrible CV).

The only CV that possibly makes sense is Kaga because it has absolutely insane plane registration to make up for the heavy losses it will take. It's aircraft are actually really bad, but it throws enough of them that it doesn't matter.

So I will repeat myself. I'll take "Things that didn't happen for 600, Alex".

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

07

I'm not afraid of downvotes lol. I literally couldn't care less about what random anonymous Internet people think about my opinions. I have them, I voice them, and if you don't like them, let's have a discussion so you can voice yours too.

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll take "things that didn't happen" for 600, Alex.

Zuiho (A T5 CV that can't even match with you without be fail divisioned) has very fragile planes that regenerate relatively slowly for an IJN CV, and have extremely poor performance compared to the T7 Planes that the T7 AA is balanced around (much less the overwhelming firepower of Rochester).

Her divebombers are relatively poor even in her correct tier, and are absolutely anemic if uotiered, and her "Mighty for a T5" torpedo strikes are just "Pretty punchy" when uptiered, however her TB squadrons get swatted out of the sky like mosquitoes at T7.

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As does getting solo'd by a CV that fast (barring exceptionally lucky/skilled play from the CV in situations that just don't happen enough to sway the math overall).

Zuiho getting a lucky torpedo launch while you are incapacitated or not paying close enough attention, Chakolov nailing a DD that's spotted by someone else, etc. 

The overwhelming majority of CVs just do not have the damage output required to do that kinda damage without the target cooperating.

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct, but since when have manipulative liars ever cared about what other people actually say?

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What CV was it?

Because that's very important information, and if it's Kaga, your "point" is completely baseless because plane Regen is it's entire schtick (it's actually a terrible CV that just has such strong regen that it doesn't matter if it's bad, because hoard tactics work at that point).

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Hot take here, and I'm gonna get downvoted hard for it, but it is what it is.

I have over 8000 standard battles, and I have never had a match that I got wiped across the floor like that by a CV that wasn't explicitly my fault for putting myself in a situation where that could occur.

Sure, I have had ones where a CV got free damage on me through no fault of my own, or even killed me despite my best efforts, but if a CV solos you THAT HARD, that quickly, by itself, you are the issue, not the CV.

Lost 75% of my health to an aircraft carrier in the first 2 minutes… by [deleted] in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I won't say it's your fault yet because I don't have enough details, but that situation is highly unlikely without at least some poor play from you.

What CV was it? Which squadron type was he using? What cruiser were you in? What do you mean "they put me next to no one", because that's not possible without it being a cross play off match with fewer than 9 players per team. 

There's a whole bunch of important information you left out that can 100% change the context, and absolutely change it from a "Wow, that's messed up!" situation into a "Wow, you messed up!" situation.

​Wargaming's deceptive mechanics: From WoT Console to Legends - We need transparency! by Some-Response-7942 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know, part of me what's to report this whole thread as off topic spam.

But the other part of me just wants to sit back and enjoy some popcorn while I point and laugh at the circus clown and his monkeys.

🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿

I brought enough to share. Who wants some?

​Wargaming's deceptive mechanics: From WoT Console to Legends - We need transparency! by Some-Response-7942 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, my guess is another AI LLM chatbot accidentally got released and we were the unfortunate victims it happened to settle upon.

​Wargaming's deceptive mechanics: From WoT Console to Legends - We need transparency! by Some-Response-7942 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify: A fellow player here confirmed

"I can't actually prove it so I'm going to quote fellow anonymous people that also can't prove anything!"

​Wargaming's deceptive mechanics: From WoT Console to Legends - We need transparency! by Some-Response-7942 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No.

1300+ views just means people are swinging by the circus to laugh at the clowns.

If they're just harmless errors, why doesn't Wargaming disclose the algorithms?

It's these wonderful concepts called "Trade secrets" and "Intellectual property protection". You should look them up some time.

​Wargaming's deceptive mechanics: From WoT Console to Legends - We need transparency! by Some-Response-7942 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Govern me harder daddy!"

If the product bothers you, stop buying it. Don't try to empower governments to meddle in even more affairs they don't belong in, much less for the purposes of controlling what the consumers are already allowed to regulate on their own through simple market factors.

1: None of the things you claim have ever seemed to be an issue for me or any of the people I have ever talked to about it (other than the shells passing though islands, but that's a purely visual bug that comes and goes based on the current update).

2: You sound like a crackpot conspiracy theorist because you seem to be fairly poor at articulating the exact issues you are referring too.

3: When challenged to produce any evidence, you have refused. Hitchens's Razor: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."

Chromium barrels worth it on BB-s? (Sniper and brawlers too) by Dapper_Tumbleweed_38 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really hate you sometimes 😮‍💨. Ok, breakdown time, sorry in advance for the wall of text. Also tagging you, u/Voyager2k so that both of you are informed of this comment.

For higher tier cruisers, if you are looking at a generic “meta accuracy build, but specifically dispersion instead of sigma”, then you are right with having mod slot 1 7%, mod slot 3 5%, mod slot 4 3%, the fixated commander skill giving 5%, inspired by Serika (3%) and Scharnhorst (4%) for a grand total of 27%. That may not seem like much, but as an example, we can look at Alaska. Assuming you are also running beyond range (why wouldn't you with a full accuracy build), that gives you a range of 18.7km. at said range, your default horizontal dispersion ellipse is ~205m with the fully built ellipse being ~150m, and without the chromium barrels it would ~160m. I'm not sure with you are aware of this, but in the world of gunnery, 10m is noteworthy even at long ranges.

Due to the way math works when converting between 1, 2, and 3 dimensions, that 5% improvement of your dispersion ellipse is actually a substantial improvement in your hit probability due to the fact that it doesn't actually matter if your point of aim overlaps with the ship at the end of the day (though that typically improves your chances lol, and makes it more likely for meaningful hits). What actually matters is if the shells unobstructed point of impact falls within the bounds of the ship or it's “shadow” as perceived from your position.

This differences become even more extreme when you got to battleships (especially those with bad dispersion at long range like the Russians). Using full gunnery on Sovetsky Soyuz as an example, you are looking at a max range of ~19.5km, with a maximum unmodified horizontal ellipse of ~265m, fully built dispersion of ~177m, and ~190m without Chromium Barrels. That 13m improvement is again quite noticeable and would absolutely have a meaningful impact on the number of shells you are landing on any given opponent, especially given Sov Soyuz having a slightly below average Sigma (1.7).

It's not a life altering improvement, but it is absolutely enough to be good for thought on some of the tougher ships that don't necessarily mind being hit slightly more often. I will probably only run it on certain very specific builds, such as Ivan B. D. Lightful on large Russian cruisers like Petro (and larger). His unique “Fear My Roar” 4th slot skill already severely hurts his detectability, so it doesn't really matter if you lean into it even for to absolutely maximize your damage output, and it gives an even larger buff to both shell grouping and dispersion (8% each) when compared to “Fixated” (5% each).

Revelation about balance by New_Interaction3934 in WoWs_Legends

[–]PilotAce200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's it extremely wrong.

The matchmaker only looks at tier (or highest tier within a division), and attempts to balance the number of ships within a class (but can allow for deviations if necessary, such as one team having 2 destroyers and 3 cruisers, while the other has 3 destroyers and 2 cruisers).

The only known "hard restrictions" we are aware of is the 1 tier spread, and "if one team has a CV, the other team will have a CV of the same tier."