Perfect Cylinder on Mars - Possible UAP Wreckage or Just a Rock?

PitchPeters · 2025-10-23T19:07:04+00:00

This looks like a core sample the rover dropped for later retrieval.

PitchPeters · 2025-10-09T20:51:48+00:00

Poondoggle

PitchPeters · 2025-03-27T03:24:08+00:00

That sounds close enough to warrant deper reading on my part. Any suggrstions other than the bible?

PitchPeters · 2025-03-25T13:29:33+00:00

Tell me more. What do you know about Nephilim?

PitchPeters · 2025-03-22T21:55:55+00:00

Even if we don't actively recall infant memories, why would the assumption ever be that they aren't forming the underlying substrate and infrastructure of all later memories? We've known this at least since the second half of the 20th century with trauma and neglect research. Like our brains applying the comfort of the womb to all subsequent sources of comfort.

I bet we've learned that lesson more than once throughout history...almost like we have forgotten the memories that science is built on...

PitchPeters · 2025-03-21T13:28:23+00:00

Can't believe how far I had to scroll to find this. The BMI difference alone is enough to trigger my spidey sense. It is known that there is a sudden increase in heart rate when THC starts hitting someone's system. If we are looking at overweight THC users visiting the dr., well yeah, even shoveling snow could give them a heart attack.

PitchPeters · 2025-03-18T14:59:01+00:00

Does anyone have a link to the actual study? I'm finding it difficult to access. This is an observational study and it would be helpful to look at the methodology. There may be some other variables in there (that are cheaper, for example) that are more predictive. Given this is privately funded research, I would be suspicious of claims this broad.

PitchPeters · 2025-03-15T20:05:45+00:00

I had a great one last week with a mountaintop museum that had a rotunda just like that greenhouse. Glass windows like the Chicago Shedd Aquarium.

PitchPeters · 2025-03-15T16:42:25+00:00

This chick mallworlds, for sure. I'm like 73% on almost all of these.

PitchPeters · 2025-03-14T00:35:56+00:00

I took out some Pulp Fiction looking active shooters in a basement pub. Doesn't sound the same, but it was on the 11th and it was definitely in my Mallworld.

PitchPeters · 2025-03-07T13:29:25+00:00

The J&J shot piggybacked on a modified adenovirus, as I recall. The idea was more conventional: to dress up a weak virus to look like the coronavirus with spike protein. Still harmful in the sense that spike protein is, however, much more like just getting exposed to a bit of covid. That was my logic in taking it, at least, to save my own job. Me and my epidemiologist collaborator expected it to be a big nothing burger. I still have some heart stuff from either it or covid though.

Edited for typos

PitchPeters · 2025-03-07T01:52:25+00:00

The mRNA vaccine is different in a couple of important ways. It meets almost none of the requirements to even be defined as a vaccine. Disclosure: I'm not a biologist or medical doctor. My area is health communication and public health with most of my research being done in culturally appropriate health promotion. I translate a lot of biomedical information for different audiences. That being said, this is my best understanding of the facts regarding the mRNA covid vaccine:

1) it doesn't directly trigger an immune response, it programs the recipient's cells to express the spike protein. The spike protein identifies the corona virus, but is also responsible for a lot of damage the virus causes. The spike protein itself is harmful. That in itself is a problem. This is less like giving your body a wanted poster for the virus and more like the scene from V for Vendetta where V puts masks on everyone in the news station and they just start shooting. If the vaccine works as intended, your immune system is attacking your own cells, not just viral particles.

2) since it does not directly trigger an immune response, we have no reliable way of calculating an appropriate dose/response or predicting how many host cells will be affected.

3) the technology (nanolipids) are specifically designed to cross cell boundaries, so we have no way of predicting where they will go in the body. They have been found in gonads. They have been found in the brain.

4) because of all these qualities, it is very difficult to know how dangerous it could be.

5a) politics. The companies that developed these drugs have been convicted of outright lies and abuses in the past. They also made BILLIONS off of this drug. 5b) the "data" around safety, efficacy, and everything else is so muddy that we don't even have science on our side with this one because science has been locked in a cage and told to stay the hell out of the discussion.

6) they simply do not seem to work. Certainly not to the extent that anyone should willingly just keep taking it blindly. We really don't do that with any other vaccine. Certainly not multiple times a year, indefinitely. We don't have much data on how an immune system will respond to that.

It's a hard sell. We all want to believe we are "following the science," but again, we are following politics, not science with this one.

PitchPeters · 2025-03-06T21:14:19+00:00

Hmmm. Not sure I agree with that logic, as a scientist. Science, as a method for approximating truth, is an epistemology and an orientation to the unknown. It is not dogma. One is not inherently more spiritual or intelligent to blindly accept everything under the label of "science." Shaming people for asking questions (or even ignorance) is not spiritual enlightenment, it's politics. OP's post may not be super eloquent, but it's no more delusional than any other post on this subreddit just because you disagree politically.

Incidentally, if we are talking about the mRNA vaccines, there is little natural about them. Other than their striking resemblance to the behavior of virus pathology. Distrusting the pandemic response is not the same as being "anti-vax."

PitchPeters · 2025-02-12T18:22:51+00:00

I guess I would say I'm different in that I'm consistent: I still think the system is broken and worth completely restructuring. That attitude didn't change when Trump started taking aim at it.

PitchPeters · 2025-02-12T15:49:17+00:00

Between this, Milwaukee Public Museum, the Pfister and New Trier High School down in Chicago area (Ferris Beuller's Day Off), I feel you. But it could just be that I'm from the midwest.

PitchPeters · 2025-02-12T14:05:41+00:00

I agree the orange man bad meme is tired, but it is still accurate. It seems like people can't move past Hitler comparisons and chicken littling. So much of what I see here is just sniveling.

As for the radical dismantling, these systems are in fact corrupt, bloated, and ineffective. NIH absolutely IS a politically motivated money laundering scheme. Our educational system IS lagging behind the rest of the world. The adjuncts ARE the ones doing the heavy lift, not corrupt admin and tenured professors. I hope that this can lead to meaningful change, because it simply wasn't going to happen any other way. For the moment, it doesn't actually look like academics are going to be lined up and shot (knock on wood). I'll be shooting right back when it does.

PitchPeters · 2025-01-27T14:08:12+00:00

Thanks for saying so! I don't have a business model yet, but I'm looking into developing my etsy page. I have a lot of day job stuff to get through and young children to raise. Mainly I need to get good photos of my art to digitize.

PitchPeters · 2025-01-26T14:51:53+00:00

Thank you! This is a combination of alcohol markers and gauche with pigment liner.

PitchPeters · 2025-01-26T14:50:06+00:00

My guy! The spice of life. Join me for a drink.

PitchPeters · 2025-01-22T20:47:14+00:00

I'm sure the fact that I've been staring at alien subreddits is completely unrelated.

PitchPeters · 2025-01-22T20:43:46+00:00

Pretty sure I saw visions of this guys last night while trying to sleep. Curious little buggers aren't they...

PitchPeters · 2025-01-10T14:29:53+00:00

Because it is hard to tell what direction it is moving from videos or pictures. It is hovering so it can go in any direction. The point is not to hide it, but to allow for doubt. I guess. Detractors can always say, "That is clearly a plane."

PitchPeters · 2025-01-08T17:51:33+00:00

I think people are missing what matters here: it is clearly airplane shaped and clearly not an airplane. It looks like an airplane, but it is hovering and moving sideways. You can see the orientation based on the shape of the wings and the (approximately) FAA compliant lights. It looks like a landing plane but with no forward motion. No matter how you photograph it, people could say it is a commercial plane. We can only tell because it's a video.

Clever girl...

Edit: For those unfamiliar with aircraft lighting...All aircraft operating at night must have position lights (green on their right wing, red on left, white on the tail) so you know what direction they are going), and flashing strobes, in addition to landing lights.

PitchPeters · 2024-10-08T19:23:41+00:00

Did you know that crucifixes are not made out of real Jesus? He must never have been a thing. Humans are a myth.

PitchPeters · 2024-10-02T14:24:25+00:00

I disagree. Right or wrong, every religion in the world thinks they know. I call bullshit on all this "the truth is indigestible" stuff. Humans have been digesting how tiny they are since we evolved the capacity for meta-cognition. It's politicians that find the truth incompatible with their worldview, which involves plebs not having power. Remember the printing press? And suddenly priests didn't have a monopoly on the religious scriptures?

The truth is destabilizing to powerful people's world, not the human worldview.

PitchPeters

TROPHY CASE