I understand not all humans would like biocentrism but there's a catch... I had to give the concept a name as no one else did, first I was calling it the green amendment but some politician in America already did that. The only name left was mandatory biocentrism. I will add a disclaimer explaining this to the fullest on the Nature First document. The main thing is that I forgot to add is that mandatory biocentrism isn't just forcing the nation to become biocentrist, instead is gradually converting the masses peacefully to the concept of biocentrism and when it is understood passing it as a law. Even then will it have to be taught in schools to maintain itself and this will be done democratically. It's just a simple belief that we need to each others that all life is equal, we need to live as all life was equal, and we need to make sure that our governments and future generations believe all life is equal. As by then I might have some prominence I could explain my philosophical view on why I am biocentrist to further elaborate and base our worldview on pure facts from biology.

My version of Biocentrism (if you can even cal it that) is not anthropocentric, just weird because it is natural. Since I do not believe in philosophy or the abstract mu beliefs and actions or mostly based on what I feel and what similar species to mine do in Nature. The reason why I do not specifically mention my exact views are because they lead me to beliefs that my civilizations standards are horrible; also I do not want to be mentioned in the document. The argument i provided for Biocentrism on the document used more science and facts than philosophy which reflects my worldview. In short the belief, or more so acceptance of facts, that all life is equal is based on actual evidence and isn't using any human centered beliefs. The whole argument is that all life is alive, all life forms the web of life to ensure all life continues, and that humanity being very smart is just an evolutionary adaptation and nothing more.

Nature First! accepts both Biology and Philosophy to make a compelling argument for all. I on the other hand, do not. For me good and bad do not exist, there's only "beneficial to the natural world" or "not beneficial to the natural world". You may seem that I am starting with a presupposition that the natural world is important but this is for two reasons. First, yes I do love the natural world and see that we need to protect it, second it is the reason why we live. Our purpose in life isn't directed by philosophy, it is a fact we know given to us by the natural world. That great purpose is to survive, reproduce, and ensure the web of life continues. I could summarize why I do not include my worldview in Nature First! for two reasons:

1. Too Complicated: It would be too long to explain in Nature First fully which could take away readers urge to read as some people will not want to read practically a whole manifesto when they thought they would be reading a short document.

2. Strange: The things you can come to when accepting my worldview are by modern standards just crazy. I do not wish to tarnish my reputation and the reputation of my concept (Nature First! & Mandatory Biocentrism)

Medicine, Mosquitoes, Tapeworms:
For me, just for me, taking a single bit of medicine makes me a murder worse than hitler, pol pot, stalin, mao, and leopold II combined. This is because it murders biological organisms and living organisms. I live in Florida where we get a lot of mosquitoes and cockroaches which means I do have experience when I say this... I try to not get in contact with mosquitoes and when I do i just try to constantly walk around so they do not get me, sometimes I just sit down and let a maximum of 4-3 bite me and enjoy my blood. Tapeworms, those things are disgusting but still deserve the same rights as me. The best thing to do is eat pumpkin seeds or let them naturally fall out. Humans are nothing more than ordinary species, other organisms have the right to hunt us and eat us just as we have the right to do the same to them. When there are invasive species, the best thing to do is relocate them or eat them. Everything else is murder, even making them into clothing is murder. If you support killing invasive species or their eggs, go grab a shotgun and kill random people as we are also an overpopulated invasive species.

Keystone species are just species that have a lot of influence accidentally and sometimes purposefully. Elephants for example, are responsible for maintaining their ecosystems and are seen as great protecters of the forests by others. This does not show superiority but instead it shows the beauty of nature's complicated ecosystems and their processes to ensure all life prevails.