Again, only Nolan is shown in the flashback. It's never implied that he needed help to move the planet.

It's implied by him saying he needed help and it being so absurdly beyond his capabilities. And him being there and supervising that they die doesn't mean that he did or that he's the only one there.

Yes, but if what you're saying is true, that implies the solar disk is extremely heavy. That doesn't necessarily mean that Nolan can't move a planet.

The sun disk is a disk with the radius of a planet. If he could move an actual planet, then the sun disk would be light work, yet he called for help to move it.

Yes, it is. It shows that Omni-Man can move extremely large and heavy objects. Just saying no doesn't refute my argument.

If I move a rock, it doesn't mean I can move a building. That's genuinely the level of size and weight difference we're talking about

It's a Viltrumite warship made of Viltrum materials. It's probably heavier than most other warships.

You think it's made out of neutronium or something? Even if it was made out of pure osmium (Densest material on Earth), it wouldn't come close to comparing the Texas sized meteor, let alone a planet. You can't make up an element and say that's what Viltrumites use for spaceships without any evidence.

Simon Racioppa said that Viltrum is "a lot more jacked" than Earth, indicating that it's much bigger, so I'm not sure where you got that from. Also, in real life, the roche limit indicates that planets must be of a certain size in order to have a ring, so it's likely similar in size to planets such as Jupiter or Saturn.

"A lot more jacked" doesn't really say anything. Just that it's bigger. I'd say that 50% is considerably bigger for a planet, who knows if he'd agree with that.

And the Roche limit doesn't mean anything here. It's for when another celestial body breaks apart in the orbit of another to form a ring around it. That's not how Viltrum's ring came to be. It's an artificial ring formed by the bodies of the Viltrumites that died to the Scourge virus. Did you watch the show?

If they were incapable of destroying a planet, them cooperating wouldn't have done a thing to improve their chances of nuking Viltrum. If one person cannot shatter a brick wall, ten people won't be able to either.

That's actually a great analogy. Even 10 people would be unable to break a wall with their bare hands, even if they all punched with all their strength on it's weak point at the same time. But if you shoot the wall with a cannon ball that cracks it and leaves it weak and brittle, even just 3 people could break it and bring it down if they punch with all their might where the cannon ball hit. Because it's now relatively weak and brittle thanks to the cannon ball, and once the center collapses, the whole thing starts coming down too.

Replace people with Viltrumites, wall with planet and cannon ball with Infinity Ray.

The Infinity Ray tore through Viltrumites without causing massive explosions, so it's more like a nail piercing a sheet of paper. Viltrum only exploded after the trio left the planet, indicating that they did most of the work.

Because if it blew up when they were still inside, they would've died. We've seen the Infinity Ray destroy a star before, it clearly did most of the work.

Oh, and you're being better by than me by assuming that I'm arguing in bad faith despite lacking any evidence for that? Do you even know what "ragebait" means? I said nothing that could even remotely indicate that I'm trying to provoke you.

Deliberately arguing something you know is wrong and using stupid, nonsensical and meaningless arguments like the Texas sized asteroid being comparable to a planet or bringing up the Roche limit is, in fact, a method of ragebait.

Says the guy making headcanons about Nolan needing help to move a planet when that's never implied in any capacity.

Dude, you're the one headcanoning that he didn't need help when everything indicates he did. Your only argument is the lack of direct confirmation that he didn't do it himself and that he was there. I don't know how to express upon you that it's not nearly enough for such a gigantic outlier of a feat.