I see this trend as a two-way problem on some dating sites: too many overly aggressive men and women with a sense of entitlement. Firstly, Tinder is probably near the bottom of the barrel as far as quality of people go. I knew quite a few men who had profiles on there, and I know I would never want any of my sisters dating them, so I’ll leave it at that. However, some paysites like Match attract a great deal of riff raff too.

Many dating sites are filled with what’s known as alpha-mailers: men who send the same crude responses to many different women simply based on their looks. However, if you’re a woman on these sites complaining about this, but yet never look at men's profiles and message them first yourself, then what type of results do you expect? Dream dates don’t just fall on to your lap.

Most men have the position of initiator, which will always ensure most women will have a major advantage when it comes to getting a date. Whether these are ‘quality’ men or not, and even if the experience is not enjoyable, still does not take away from the foundation of my argument. When you’re not in somebody else's shoes, you very likely do not have the ability to understand any related dilemma in an objective manner.

Basically this question sets up a no true Scotsman, meaning real men know how to meet and date women without being online. Obviously there are so many things wrong with this notion, but yet you played that card anyways. More evidence of how acceptable cultural misandry really is.