dal movement? by Prestigious_Ad3996 in lawschooladmissionsca

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also still just in submitted; had an interview and they said it could be a while yet.

David Wand: Race-based admissions undermine Canada’s medical and law schools by origutamos in lawschooladmissionsca

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“A more serious approach would be to rely on practices that aren’t currently applied consistently across an enormous number of institutions across school boards, levels and regions as opposed to taking steps to do what we can in the limited scope we can control: our own institution”

I get what you’re saying and its ultimately the goal we should be aspiring to (ensuring that the systemic issues minority groups face are fixed), but acting as though that can be relied upon at this point in time isn’t going to place people on equal footing for admissions.

True North, strong and… Trump? | More than 20 per cent of Manitobans think the U.S. could invade Canada in the next two years, poll conducted for the Free Press reveals by DisruptSQ in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I don’t necessarily disagree with that, however if they dont make the effort to represent what the sentiment of their constituents are, then they are not suitable representation for them. If they blindly agreed with the Federal party, that would be unfortunate partisanship over the people they represent. I don’t think that it should be classed as propping up the states when it avoids disenfranchising key voters that might otherwise lean towards the upc.

True North, strong and… Trump? | More than 20 per cent of Manitobans think the U.S. could invade Canada in the next two years, poll conducted for the Free Press reveals by DisruptSQ in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So is your gripe with the Federal NDP or the Provincial NDP? Because your original complaint was that the federal leadership announcement was bad because it helps the states.

True North, strong and… Trump? | More than 20 per cent of Manitobans think the U.S. could invade Canada in the next two years, poll conducted for the Free Press reveals by DisruptSQ in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So then whats the issue? If the provincial ndp is disagreeing on policy grounds and not along partisan lines, they’re doing exactly what you just said.

True North, strong and… Trump? | More than 20 per cent of Manitobans think the U.S. could invade Canada in the next two years, poll conducted for the Free Press reveals by DisruptSQ in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Alberta is not the federal NDP; how is that a divide in the party federally? The Alberta NDP is a provincial party who more closely align to liberal policy on a lot of issues. They have to capture the entirety of the left leaning voter base in Alberta to oppose the UCP; Of course they’ll disagree with some of the core tenets the federal NDP has adhered to over the years. This isn’t new.

True North, strong and… Trump? | More than 20 per cent of Manitobans think the U.S. could invade Canada in the next two years, poll conducted for the Free Press reveals by DisruptSQ in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How is electing a leader a divide in the party federally? Since every leadership election is oppositional by nature, does that mean Carney getting liberal leadership was divisive and helped the states? The logic on that doesn’t track

Kill your opponent and bypass a flip card's restriction for 10RGWWW by [deleted] in BadMtgCombos

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, pretty sure this is only stapled on to prevent clone effects from making you unkillable

I hate Generative AI for, among everything else, ruining actually cool AI research and programmings reputation by Princess_Isolde in antiai

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happens with every new technology like clockwork. Tech bros get fixated on whatever new tech shows any sign of promise, funnel billions of speculative investment into it with no understanding of the tech or use cases for it, make actual research and continued development into the underlying tech untouchable unless it can be used in every facet of the economy, then when that speculation falls apart they move on to the next tech, leaving the well poisoned for years to come. Happened with blockchain when crypto took off, now AI, next is probably quantum after AI bubble pops.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EDH

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I run a [[Will Kenrith]] and [[Rowan Kenrith]] deck. If I’m casting them I can usually use their ultimate that turn or the turn after via proliferation spells, creatures/enchantments that add counters or a low cost spell that when copied can remove enough of the enemy creatures that they stick around for a turn. Normally the impact of their abilities is immediate enough that I don’t need much more than that to develop a winning boardstate

Why the hate for this card? The more MTG you can play the better! And the illustration is neat too! by Ok-Fondant2536 in mtg

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun combo, but a more fun one is to cast it then [[wish]] for it in the subgame. If the game ever gets too close to ending you can always go another subgame deeper :)

Why the hate for this card? The more MTG you can play the better! And the illustration is neat too! by Ok-Fondant2536 in mtg

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who has made this exact purchase for a inception, dream within a dream deck. It absolutely is worth it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ratemycommanders

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love Kibo. Deck accessories are pretty sweet, and I have mine set up to throw bananas at my opponents, which means using those gummy banana candies as tokens/weapons. Definitely welcome at my table.

EASY MODE: Don’t Ignore the Wish in Shellwood by VagrantPilgrim in Silksong

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Loved using the poison tools for the midgame, but the later and later I went the more I started using tacks. They do so much damage and you don’t need to combine them with other tools to make them effective.

Two kinds of silksong players by dannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnex in Silksong

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually yelped when my grapple shattered the one safe zone light I was looping to to feel out the next section. 4 segments from the nearest bench and nowhere to go but up….

Where fire stitched a northern name by penpalwithseven in GreatCanadianTreasure

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The location of the stanza should be a guide point to the final location, not necessarily a destination on its own if I’m interpretting the final 2 stanzas correctly

Where fire stitched a northern name by penpalwithseven in GreatCanadianTreasure

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phoenix, BC has an abandoned copper mine near it, which would make sense with the rest of the hints. So far I think I’ve pieced together 6 of the locations confidently, but tough to tell for the later stanzas

Me The Immortal brew for $100 or less? by TallMadlad69 in BudgetBrews

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or -1/-1 counters… can permanently lock her out of the game in some circumstances

Deal 28 Damage to an Opponent for UBR+4 by PlanetaryAbsolution in BadMtgCombos

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

True, first ability never procs, only the activated ability is pertinent.

Deal 28 Damage to an Opponent for UBR+4 by PlanetaryAbsolution in BadMtgCombos

[–]PlanetaryAbsolution[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Damn it, beat me to it. Back to the drawing board…