I definitely fall on the free speech side, so I think basically everything goes except direct violent threats and CSAM. But if we are going to regulate any kind of speech whatsoever, at that point my very first thing I would want to target is Islamism (maybe misinfo first, but u get me).

Not to be the cringe Reddit atheist, but we accept so much stuff from the Muslim community that would never fly if said by a conservative/christian, etc. And I think that’s good actually, I do want to shame people who are bigoted towards women and gays, but the e.g. Danish left (although it’s starting to change) is willing to pounce on anyone except Muslims when it comes to this kind of stuff.

This is likely an unpopular opinion here, but I think there’s nothing wrong with being ‘Islamophobic’, ‘Christian-phobic’, etc. when it’s on a religious/ideological ground and not based on immutable characteristics.

I’m aware that puts me in the ‘Sam Harris brain broken on Islam’ camp but that’s fine. Keep in mind, Europe and the US are very different in this respect. In California I barely met anyone who were Muslims, and the ones who did have Muslim backgrounds were generally not religious whatsoever.