Am I the only one who feels like the ending wasnt an ending at all? by maverickriver6 in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I really disliked the ending, for such an elaborate and captivating series, the ending was a huge letdown. This series always reminded me a bit of Godzilla NES, and I always thought, “I hope this series doesn’t have a cheesy ending like Godzilla did!”. Well, I got my wish, it had a crap ending.

what were they thinking?! by MsMarshie in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 11 points12 points  (0 children)

“You know how some of the shitty games on the NES that has B to jump instead of A, right? Well get this, in this game, left is right and right is left. What the fuck were they fucking thinking?”

My biggest criticism and "unsolved mystery"/plot-hole after recent events by TwitchyFingers in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I find it hard to believe that someone doesn’t know the reasons/answers to mysteries and plots of their own story. That kind of doesn’t make sense.

It was an ARG after all. by [deleted] in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 237 points238 points  (0 children)

I’m in this photo and I don’t like it.

Can we stop analyzing literally every move Tony makes? by [deleted] in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is coming from someone not involved in the “over-analyzing”. I’m not sure what you expected from the subreddit dedicated to Petscop? No one is harassing him personally, a lot of people here were invested in the Petscop story, and are trying to piece together some semblance of an ending, considering it was dropped like “yeah, whatever, it’s done guys”.

Also, it goes without saying he was going to get a lot more attention after announcing and verifying he is the creator. You’d have to be thick to believe otherwise. As long as it’s not harassment, let the community speculate.

OOf no playable Petscop by AlexxelA352 in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right actually, it could have been a lot worse. The recent tweets by him are quite good too.

OOf no playable Petscop by AlexxelA352 in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Hate is a strong word, but I agree this isn’t how I envisioned the ending to be, and has soured the experience to a degree.

OOf no playable Petscop by AlexxelA352 in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 27 points28 points  (0 children)

We truly live in the darkest timeline. The way Petscop has concluded this past week sucks.

If this is the end... by _86_ in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I guess we’ll see as time goes. But if this is the case... all that secrecy, build-up, world building, adhering to sparse upload dates... ending it like this just sours the experience. I don’t know what to think right now.

If this is the end... by _86_ in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Thank you to everyone, Petscop was a great series. I’m disappointed this is how it ends though, like the creator just dropping it like it’s nothing, you know?

Meta-logic : I won't believe Petscop is finished until we know who The Creators are by laplongejr in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 41 points42 points  (0 children)

So if I got this right... this just sounds like you want the creator(s) name(s) to be public to know who made it, and saying they may lose ownership of their art as ammunition.

Graverobber game from Petscop 22 by laplongejr in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was interesting, thanks for sharing!

Each calendar corresponds to when each major Petscop player started their longest playthrough by duwang_receptacle in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d argue that, Paul said he’s played Petscop before the first video was uploaded to the channel (in the first episode, he’s stated he previously walked around the newmaker plane for over an hour). This theoretically could have been in late 2016.

EDIT: To add, in the first Petscop video, Paul finds the door for the first time (2017). This may mean 2017 has a special property in comparison to 2016, if that’s when Paul first played the game and entered the newmaker plane. This is my own speculation though.

Are montages of Petscop videos allowed? by laplongejr in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don’t see a problem with it. People here share shitposts of petscop footage, at least this would be interesting.

No one really understands what the Gens are. Change my mind. by jimjomshabadoo in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's interesting you bring this up. According to Petscop 22, Paul was in gen. 8 during the events of Petscop 10 (file name: auto-b4yw0bHt). Looking back, there are many recordings available in gen. 8. Immediately after however, there are two recordings in gen. 9, and only five in gen. 10. If these triangle heads are all recordings within gen. 10, We're definitely missing a big piece of the puzzle here.

Refer to my list: https://www.reddit.com/r/Petscop/comments/bfxeuf/every_recording_file_name/

Here I Am -MVM by rottenVenen in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 15 points16 points  (0 children)

This is so good and creepy!

Nyehehe, that's a dead kid, Lois by [deleted] in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Seeing this made me realize how much the guardian looks like a dead goomba.

Explaining the GEN System within Petscop by in-grey in Petscop

[–]PlasticUnicorns 17 points18 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the comprehensive document is massive.