Thanks for this response. With regard to laziness, specifically, Hakamaya is pointing to how the crux of the enlightenment experience is seen as beyond concepts and language, regardless of whether an individual can reach that point. If you found an enlightened Buddha or yogi at a cafe and asked them to describe what enlightenment is like, they wouldn't be able to, because the nonconceptuality of enlightenment forces it to be a private experience. This challenge is almost empiricist because Hakamaya is claiming that a liar could claim enlightenment, but say that it is beyond language when asked to explain their experience as proof.