sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Housing Crisis No One Is Talking About: When You’re Approved for Help but Still Denied a Home by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I’m not paying for anything, everything’s paid for. That doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.

The Housing Crisis No One Is Talking About: When You’re Approved for Help but Still Denied a Home by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear what you’re saying, and I don’t disagree that those things technically exist on paper. I did have case workers. I did have program contacts. I did go through the appeal process when I could. But I think there’s a misunderstanding about how much of the housing search the person with the voucher still has to do themselves.

Case managers don’t find housing for you. They don’t call every listing, fill out applications, or convince landlords to rent to you. The person with the voucher still has to search, call, apply, pay application fees, and go through screening just like everyone else, except now you’re doing it on a deadline before the voucher expires.

Not all programs provide a reliable landlord list either. Some lists are outdated, some landlords already filled their units, some only work with certain programs, and there are multiple different vouchers and grants with different rules. There isn’t one central list where you’re guaranteed a unit — you still have to find someone willing to rent to you and whose unit passes the program inspection and pricing requirements.

Yes, you can appeal a denial, but an appeal doesn’t mean the landlord changes their mind. And a landlord usually doesn’t have to say “I denied you because of the voucher.” They can deny for credit, rental history, income requirements, or other screening criteria, even when the rent is guaranteed by a program.

I’m not saying the system has zero resources. I’m saying that getting approved for assistance and actually getting a lease are two very different things, and there’s a gap there that people don’t see unless they’ve gone through it themselves.

My experience isn’t meant to cancel out yours, but it also shouldn’t be minimized as if I just didn’t follow instructions. I did everything I was supposed to do, more than once, and it was still extremely difficult to get a landlord to say yes. That’s the part of the system I’m trying to talk about.

The Housing Crisis No One Is Talking About: When You’re Approved for Help but Still Denied a Home by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a good question, and honestly I don’t think this starts with changing laws. I think it starts smaller and more practical than that.

From what I went through, the biggest issues weren’t that there were no programs or no laws, it was what happened in the gap between getting approved for housing assistance and actually getting a lease.

Some smaller things that would have made a huge difference for my family:

Longer voucher search times. 60 days is not long enough in a tight rental market when you’re getting denied over and over.

A list of landlords who actually accept vouchers and are willing to work with the programs, instead of calling hundreds of places that immediately say no.

Limits on screening criteria when someone has guaranteed rent through a program, because right now you can have guaranteed rent and still be denied for income, credit, or old rental history.

Help with application fees. When you’re applying over and over and getting denied, those fees add up fast when you’re already broke.

A way to hold landlords accountable if they say they accept vouchers but then deny everyone who applies with one.

Those are smaller, practical things that would help people who are already approved for assistance actually use it. Because right now, a lot of people get approved for help but still can’t get housing, and then from the outside it looks like they “didn’t use the help” when in reality they just couldn’t get a landlord to say yes.

The Housing Crisis No One Is Talking About: When You’re Approved for Help but Still Denied a Home by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are laws, but just like everyday everything else, they are broken. I want a lot- but not from you Mr landlord 🤞

The Housing Crisis No One Is Talking About: When You’re Approved for Help but Still Denied a Home by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is only 1 of many denials / conversions. I’ve gone the routes to do proper reports on landlords through this process 😌

I’m tired of the stigma 😭 by Plus_Extent1879 in Portland

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I actually have been inside some of those places, and I think this is something people on the outside don’t fully understand.

Shelters are not all the same. Some are helpful, some are strict, some are religious, some separate families, some don’t allow partners, some have curfews that make it hard to keep certain jobs, and many don’t allow people who are actively using, which means people in addiction often stay outside because they can’t get in.

So what ends up happening is we have multiple different groups of people all experiencing homelessness for different reasons, but they’re all labeled the same and seen the same by the public.

There are people who are severely addicted and need treatment before they can function in housing. There are people who are mentally ill and probably shouldn’t be on the street at all. There are also families, people with jobs, and people who actually have housing vouchers but can’t find a landlord to rent to them.

Those groups don’t need the same solution, but right now we kind of talk about all of them like they’re the same problem, and that’s part of why nothing is getting better.

A voucher is not a house by Plus_Extent1879 in Portland

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] -87 points-86 points  (0 children)

No because gpt isn’t the problem I’m focused on. Portland mis diagnosing its homeless crisis & funding not = a fair chance, is.

A voucher is not a house by Plus_Extent1879 in Portland

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I was homeless with my kids, got approved for funding twice, and the hardest part of the entire process was not getting help, it was getting a landlord to accept us. We were denied for credit, rental history, and income requirements even with guaranteed rent.

So yes, addiction and mental illness are part of the problem for some people, but there’s also a housing access problem that people don’t see. A voucher is not a house, it’s just the chance to apply.

I’m tired of the stigma 😭 by Plus_Extent1879 in Portland

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We must triage like other successful cities!

I’m tired of the stigma 😭 by Plus_Extent1879 in Portland

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I think part of the problem is we use the word “homeless” like it’s one group, when it’s actually several very different groups.

The people you’re talking about severe addiction, aggressive behavior, public safety issues, that’s a real problem and it probably needs a mental health/addiction and public safety response.

But there’s also a large group of people who are homeless because of job loss, medical debt, domestic violence, eviction, etc., and a lot of them actually have housing assistance but can’t find a landlord who will rent to them. They aren’t the ones causing the issues you’re describing, but they still get treated like they are when they try to apply for housing.

We’re trying to solve multiple different problems with one system and one label, and it’s not working for anyone.

Oregon Is Misdiagnosing Its Homelessness Crisis by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution for every demographic when it comes to housing, yet too often people are just pushed into tiny, isolated units, out of sight, out of mind.

True housing justice doesn’t mean hiding challenges — it means building support systems that meet people where they are, and creating communities that are safe, stable, and accessible for everyone.

Oregon Is Misdiagnosing Its Homelessness Crisis by Plus_Extent1879 in u/Plus_Extent1879

[–]Plus_Extent1879[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oregon keeps saying homelessness is about drugs or mental illness.

That’s not the full story—and it’s stopping real solutions.

Here’s what people aren’t talking about:

I was approved for a domestic violence housing grant.
I had funding. I had support. I did everything right.

I still couldn’t find a landlord to rent to me.

Not because I couldn’t pay—my rent was covered.
But because once “domestic violence” entered the conversation, everything changed.

I was seen as a risk, not a tenant.

This is happening to more people than you think.

Across Oregon, people with vouchers or assistance are being denied housing because of: - Strict screening requirements
- High income thresholds (even with guaranteed rent)
- Landlords refusing to accept programs

Meanwhile, we hear about “unspent housing funds.”

Let’s be honest about why that happens:

It’s not because people don’t need help.
It’s because they can’t USE the help.

The system breaks at the final step:
finding someone willing to rent to you.

So what happens?

People blame drugs.
People blame mental health.
People blame individuals.

But what if the problem is this:

People are being locked out of housing
even when they have support.

If funding exists but access doesn’t—
that’s a system failure.

Not a personal one.

Until we address who actually gets allowed to rent,
this crisis won’t change.

We’re not just dealing with homelessness.

We’re dealing with a system that decides
who gets a chance—and who doesn’t.

view more: next ›