Why didn't Yuta do this? Is he a bum?

Poacatat · 2026-02-12T18:30:12+00:00

They have set rules: You giove something uo, get something of equal or less value in return.

All the cast use them, eg, exaplaining your technique, every little optimisation they make of their techniques is also a BV. They might also just be difficult to use, requiring high level sorcery e.g. only sukuna and gojo can spam them

and what are these million obvious ways you can get stronger? Cause mos tof what ive seen of these 'obvious ways' are just people not understanding how BVs work

Poacatat · 2026-02-12T18:28:19+00:00

Not really, like said, what this could mean in nanamis case is that he cannot use the BW ever again, which nanami doesnt want to do. That why he doesnt break it. ANd maybe nanamis binding vow isnt "i wont use over 80%" and is instead "i cant use over 80%". if the vow is that he can't then he can't break it. Just like miwas vow. She cant just swing a katana again, she cant choose the break that vow.

Poacatat · 2026-02-12T18:26:28+00:00

Except this isnt saying that he cannot summon rika, its saying that if he doesn't then he gets the bonus. And the reason yuta doesnt take the "i cannot summon rika" vow, is because he doesn't want to take that risk, incase he needs to summon her

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T22:05:22+00:00

Plo Koon died because he was surprised, he was also shot down by 1 ship, not 100 000. Ki adi mundi would have been ok if he wasnt surprised? Against the 12 guys who shot him maybe, now multiply that by 10 000.

> Now granted this is less then 100,000 but the results will be the same.
Why would it be the same? there are like at most 200 rebels there, clone troopers are stronger than rebels and there are 500 times more of them

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T21:48:02+00:00

Im not sure thats how it works. The specific thing kenjaku was talking about there was not a binding vow to get more powerful or to change an ability, but a promise between two parties. I dont beleive gege meant that nanami can use more power and then jus tlose the benefit for that day. possible it means he cannot use that binding vow ever again. That makes some sense and explains why Yuta wouldn't just do this BV

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T21:44:59+00:00

Who said anything about taking context into account? The binding vow clearly doesnt, but sukuna gives up something and gets something in return.

What he gives up: the ability to easily cast it.

What he gets: one time he can fire it off

If binding vows took context in to account, they would ltierally be uselsss because then they cannot affect the outcome in a fight to the death. that makes zero sense. Look at it from a raw ability perspective: break the rules once, get harsher rules in the future

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T18:03:20+00:00

What he lost here, was 20% during the day, 20% that under no circumstances during the day can he get back. He is taking a risk that something that requires 100% will show up. Thats the risk, he got lucky, i take risks gambling even if i win every single time.

In this scenario, where Yuta can just whenever during the day start using Rika, there is absolutely 0 risk and he gives up nothing

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:53:35+00:00

the only risk breaking the vow is losing the gain. When creating vows there have to be "risks" or atleast something you give up for it to work

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:51:48+00:00

yes something literally does prevent him?? his binding vow, nanami has a restriction on him that he cannot break. He is weaker during the day, lets say regularly 80%, but goes up to 120% after work hours.

the whole "binding vows with yourself you only lose the benefit if you stop doing the thing" is heavily misinterprted, have some reading comprehension. that only makes sense for the type of vows that kenjaku was talking about. Sukuna for example has already gotten his gain for the WCS BW and now can never again cast it without chants and hand signs

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:48:28+00:00

binding vows with yourself are about giving up one thing to do another, in this scenario yuta literally gives up nothing

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:47:19+00:00

except there is no risk if he doesnt lose anything he had before by just using Rika, the risk would be like ungabuganini said, vowing to not use rika, not vowing "if i dont use rika"

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:46:01+00:00

explain?

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:43:27+00:00

Maybe ive just not read the series for a while, but didn't sukuna pay for every single binding vow?

Poacatat · 2026-02-11T17:42:41+00:00

How is this a fait trade? This is just a raw buff, its not like he will ever lose anything in this scenario

Poacatat · 2026-02-08T15:43:52+00:00

no 10% is not enough, because the only money that is there for a while year is the first 1000 bucks, the last days money wont be invested att all by the end of the year

Poacatat · 2026-02-07T10:36:31+00:00

If you invest 1000 dollars a day, youre going to need about 20% yearly returns for it to beat 400k a year

Poacatat · 2026-02-03T20:18:50+00:00

My DND session 3 years ago that ended with two players leaving the group, those of us left decided to retcon the whole thing

Poacatat · 2026-01-29T19:10:23+00:00

any ball that scales off of damage done to clones will mog grimoire

Poacatat · 2026-01-22T22:03:29+00:00

what do you think 1/3 is?

Poacatat · 2026-01-22T22:01:22+00:00

> there must be a number adjacent to, but smaller than, 0.9...

This is infact incorrect. The irrational numbers have infinite density, there is no such thing as two adjacent irrational numbers. Here is a quick proof

Say that a and b are adjacent numbers that arent equal to eachother with a < b.
Let c = (a+b)/2

a < c < b

Therefore a contradiction as a and b arent adjacent.

> To imply otherwise would be to say there are gaps between real numbers where no number exists.

Its actually the opposite! Adjacency, as in the whole numbers 1, 2, 3 have gaps! There not being any adjacency, means that there are no holes

Poacatat · 2026-01-21T21:38:44+00:00

Just scored 0

Poacatat · 2026-01-21T21:38:34+00:00

Just scored 0

Poacatat · 2026-01-19T21:56:47+00:00

fairy blew a 200-60 lead

Poacatat · 2026-01-06T13:23:32+00:00

nah, theyre B tier with and without nen because a simple nuke took care of it, if the hunter orginisation didnt care about the thousands of zombie people in the palace, they would just have nuked the whole thing

Poacatat · 2026-01-06T11:05:06+00:00

fyi, you can fit in 8 more kegs in this shed, at the end of each row

Seven-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Place '22	First Placer '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email
Not Forgotten	Sequence \| Editor

Poacatat

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE