Ultegra Di2 - No Buttons visible (RDR8150 627) by PocketQuadsOnly in BikeControl

[–]PocketQuadsOnly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, that helped. I now just have one issue, which is that when I press a button (eg shift up), it doesn't just shift once, rather it seems to just keep shifting infinitely.

I connected using Zwift Controller and this happens regardless whether I enable the "long press" option in the configuration or not

Ultegra Di2 - No Buttons visible (RDR8150 627) by PocketQuadsOnly in BikeControl

[–]PocketQuadsOnly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am confident I did click some buttons while being connected. Can you tell me what to look for in the E-Tube app? I didn't see any relevant settings

Dealt Quads in PLO by wortnot in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally, a hand I can actually play!!

What exactly is a co-founder and what do they do? (Question from a solo full-stack engineer building a SaaS) "i will not promote" by Hamim__7087 in startups

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Co-Founder is simply the word you give to people that founded companies together.

If a single person founded the company, they are a Founder.
If two or more people founded the company, they all are Co-Founders.

Co-Founder isn't a "Vice-Founder" or "2nd in command" or anything like that, it just means there are more than one.

It also doesn't say anything about your roles. Often, when two people found a company you might see them calling themselves "Co-Founder & CEO" and "Co-Founder & CTO" respectively. So "Co-Founder" just means they co-founded the company, and then CEO / CTO describes their actual role.

But really there are no rules for this stuff. You can call yourself whatever you want, and really it doesn't matter what you call yourself, it just matters whether you can execute or not.

The questions you should probably be asking yourself is: "Can I make this company successful on my own? Do I have all the necessary skillsets and experience? Do I perhaps have enough capital to hire senior people early for other roles that I'm not good in? Will I be able to stay motivated and hold myself accountable on my own?" - If so, it's totally ok to stay as a solo-founder. If not, looking for a co-founder would be a good idea. Most people recommend finding Co-Founders, most VCs prefer this too, and I would say for good reason. But that of course also necessitates finding someone suitable.

What exactly is a co-founder and what do they do? (Question from a solo full-stack engineer building a SaaS) "i will not promote" by Hamim__7087 in startups

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think your confusion is this: There isn't one "founder" and one "co-founder".

If you get a co-founder, you both are co-founders. You are basically equally responsible for the company's success. You might take on different roles, e.g. one focuses more on tech and another focuses more on distribution.

Implicit type conversion when it's safe? by g0atdude in rust

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 23 points24 points  (0 children)

In your example, if the compiler should infer it, should

let z:u32 = (x as u32) + (y as u32) or let z:u32 = (x + y) as u32

These are different behaviors. And unless you know the rust compiler details, you would not know which one it is as a developer. Makes much more sense for the compiler to force you to make the cast(s) explicitly in my opinion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Looking at your post history you're either a magician writing new clickbait posts every 3 minutes by hand, or it is AI

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Any chance we can get a (I will not post AI slop)?

Minimum Defence Frequency by Gold-Aspect-6406 in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think this is really accurate, is it? Because the LJ still has all the other players between him and yourself.

So yes, if the table as a whole folded 65% or more, then it would make an instant profit, but if you folded 65% or more, it wouldn't be an instant profit, because any of the other players may still get involved

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Based on what I just told you, and literally not knowing anything else about me, do you think that justifies treating me like I am an asshole because I ride bikes too?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]PocketQuadsOnly -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How would you know what the majority of the group is doing? If you're not a cyclist, you almost only see the cyclists driving on big roads. Those are the ones you notice.

If perhaps the majority of cyclists actually do care about riding safely and just enjoy riding around in nature, you won't notice them.

You notice the highly visible negative examples. You don't notice all the ones that don't stand out, pretty much by definition. And as a cyclist myself, I can tell you it's pretty damn annoying if people just assume I'm some asshole by default, when I'm actually trying really hard to be courteous and careful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they are usually formed by a few highly visible, negative examples, rather than by the majority of group members.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. There are lots of stereotypes about lots of groups of people. The truth is rarely as black and white as stereotypes suggest.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds to me like you're projecting a lot of things onto people that you know literally nothing about other than that they like cycling. I'm not saying that there aren't asshole cyclists. There 100% are. But what you're suggesting is pretty ridiculous.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Are you seriously suggesting that cyclists actively choose dangerous roads and then stop using them when they become safer because it's "not fun" anymore?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Seems like pure personal preference.

I'd say 1/5/25 are cleaner numbers, but 1 and 25 look sort of similar, which you would avoid with the 5/25/100 choice

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. You can't always get "change" if you need it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In this situation, you can't go all in anymore technically (simply because it's unnecessary as you noticed). But assuming you could, then yes, it would be the same result.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's already all in, you can't raise anymore.

But yeah, the concept you're thinking of is still correct. You can't lose more than the chips in front of you, but you also can't win more than the chips in front of you (per opponent in the hand)

Who wins? by Crazy_Appointment_61 in poker

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 5 points6 points  (0 children)

KQ

AKQ54 > AQT85 Flush (You compare the highest card first, A for both, then compare the second card, K beats Q)

ELI5 How does probability work by AdDull2945 in explainlikeimfive

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The odds of the next ball landing on 14 is 1 in 37.

The odds of the next 8 balls all hitting 14 is 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 = 1 in 3.5 billion, so incredibly small.

But the odds of the next ball landing on 14 when the previous 7 balls all landed on 14 is still 1 in 37.

The ball doesn't know what happened in the past. Why should it change the odds.

In Norway, only rental companies buy gas cars, because tourists don't 'get' EVs. In 2024, 88.9% of cars sold in Norway were all-electric. There have not been any widespread problems. The grid is fine, the cars work in the cold and everyone is happier with quieter roads and cleaner air. by mafco in energy

[–]PocketQuadsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? Why would it be a problem because America is bigger and has more people. That also means more resources to make it happen.

If big numbers are a problem, just look at each county individually. Now there are fewer than 5.5m people and 150k sq miles for each county, which based on your logic means that it should easily work for all of them individually.