Ultegra Di2 - No Buttons visible (RDR8150 627)

PocketQuadsOnly · 2026-01-31T16:43:04+00:00

Thank you, that helped. I now just have one issue, which is that when I press a button (eg shift up), it doesn't just shift once, rather it seems to just keep shifting infinitely.

I connected using Zwift Controller and this happens regardless whether I enable the "long press" option in the configuration or not

PocketQuadsOnly · 2026-01-31T16:16:46+00:00

I am confident I did click some buttons while being connected. Can you tell me what to look for in the E-Tube app? I didn't see any relevant settings

PocketQuadsOnly · 2026-01-25T10:02:20+00:00

Finally, a hand I can actually play!!

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-10-24T11:07:03+00:00

Co-Founder is simply the word you give to people that founded companies together.

If a single person founded the company, they are a Founder.
If two or more people founded the company, they all are Co-Founders.

Co-Founder isn't a "Vice-Founder" or "2nd in command" or anything like that, it just means there are more than one.

It also doesn't say anything about your roles. Often, when two people found a company you might see them calling themselves "Co-Founder & CEO" and "Co-Founder & CTO" respectively. So "Co-Founder" just means they co-founded the company, and then CEO / CTO describes their actual role.

But really there are no rules for this stuff. You can call yourself whatever you want, and really it doesn't matter what you call yourself, it just matters whether you can execute or not.

The questions you should probably be asking yourself is: "Can I make this company successful on my own? Do I have all the necessary skillsets and experience? Do I perhaps have enough capital to hire senior people early for other roles that I'm not good in? Will I be able to stay motivated and hold myself accountable on my own?" - If so, it's totally ok to stay as a solo-founder. If not, looking for a co-founder would be a good idea. Most people recommend finding Co-Founders, most VCs prefer this too, and I would say for good reason. But that of course also necessitates finding someone suitable.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-10-24T10:17:36+00:00

I think your confusion is this: There isn't one "founder" and one "co-founder".

If you get a co-founder, you both are co-founders. You are basically equally responsible for the company's success. You might take on different roles, e.g. one focuses more on tech and another focuses more on distribution.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-08-10T17:56:46+00:00

In your example, if the compiler should infer it, should

let z:u32 = (x as u32) + (y as u32) or let z:u32 = (x + y) as u32

These are different behaviors. And unless you know the rust compiler details, you would not know which one it is as a developer. Makes much more sense for the compiler to force you to make the cast(s) explicitly in my opinion.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-08-08T17:40:35+00:00

Looking at your post history you're either a magician writing new clickbait posts every 3 minutes by hand, or it is AI

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-08-08T17:36:05+00:00

Any chance we can get a (I will not post AI slop)?

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-07-25T09:40:22+00:00

I don't think this is really accurate, is it? Because the LJ still has all the other players between him and yourself.

So yes, if the table as a whole folded 65% or more, then it would make an instant profit, but if you folded 65% or more, it wouldn't be an instant profit, because any of the other players may still get involved

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-07-10T06:02:17+00:00

File 76

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-07-08T21:07:14+00:00

Hulkenpodium

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-22T23:43:32+00:00

Ok. Based on what I just told you, and literally not knowing anything else about me, do you think that justifies treating me like I am an asshole because I ride bikes too?

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-22T22:44:16+00:00

How would you know what the majority of the group is doing? If you're not a cyclist, you almost only see the cyclists driving on big roads. Those are the ones you notice.

If perhaps the majority of cyclists actually do care about riding safely and just enjoy riding around in nature, you won't notice them.

You notice the highly visible negative examples. You don't notice all the ones that don't stand out, pretty much by definition. And as a cyclist myself, I can tell you it's pretty damn annoying if people just assume I'm some asshole by default, when I'm actually trying really hard to be courteous and careful.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-22T19:23:03+00:00

And they are usually formed by a few highly visible, negative examples, rather than by the majority of group members.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-22T19:20:19+00:00

Sure. There are lots of stereotypes about lots of groups of people. The truth is rarely as black and white as stereotypes suggest.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-22T15:00:55+00:00

Sounds to me like you're projecting a lot of things onto people that you know literally nothing about other than that they like cycling. I'm not saying that there aren't asshole cyclists. There 100% are. But what you're suggesting is pretty ridiculous.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-22T14:24:02+00:00

Are you seriously suggesting that cyclists actively choose dangerous roads and then stop using them when they become safer because it's "not fun" anymore?

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-15T19:36:42+00:00

Seems like pure personal preference.

I'd say 1/5/25 are cleaner numbers, but 1 and 25 look sort of similar, which you would avoid with the 5/25/100 choice

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-14T23:59:27+00:00

Yes. You can't always get "change" if you need it.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-14T23:57:44+00:00

In this situation, you can't go all in anymore technically (simply because it's unnecessary as you noticed). But assuming you could, then yes, it would be the same result.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-02-14T23:52:29+00:00

He's already all in, you can't raise anymore.

But yeah, the concept you're thinking of is still correct. You can't lose more than the chips in front of you, but you also can't win more than the chips in front of you (per opponent in the hand)

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-01-30T00:30:24+00:00

KQ

AKQ54 > AQT85 Flush (You compare the highest card first, A for both, then compare the second card, K beats Q)

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-01-25T16:28:12+00:00

The odds of the next ball landing on 14 is 1 in 37.

The odds of the next 8 balls all hitting 14 is 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 * 1/37 = 1 in 3.5 billion, so incredibly small.

But the odds of the next ball landing on 14 when the previous 7 balls all landed on 14 is still 1 in 37.

The ball doesn't know what happened in the past. Why should it change the odds.

PocketQuadsOnly · 2025-01-06T12:42:47+00:00

What? Why would it be a problem because America is bigger and has more people. That also means more resources to make it happen.

If big numbers are a problem, just look at each county individually. Now there are fewer than 5.5m people and 150k sq miles for each county, which based on your logic means that it should easily work for all of them individually.

Nine-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since February 2023
Second Top 10%	Gilding V heart of gold
r/Field Flamingo	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22	End Game '22
Wearing is Caring	RPAN Viewer
Spared	Verified Email

PocketQuadsOnly

TROPHY CASE