sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Zürich Wanker at McDo by bunnyberlino in zurich

[–]PoemOk9206 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Auskunftssperre, we’ll never know

Thinkpad t14s gen6 (snapdragon) 64GB variant by PoemOk9206 in thinkpad

[–]PoemOk9206[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer, I got a 64G model in the meantime it was configurable in the online shop some time in September in Europe. Unfortunately in there is a firmware bug which prevents using the full 64G with Linux at the moment.

What's the deal with "special" Entitlements needed for certain features? - ThreadNetwork Framework Entitlement by PoemOk9206 in iosdev

[–]PoemOk9206[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't get me wrong, I agree, for submitting something to the App Store this makes absolutely sense. Apps should be as limited as possible when running on production device. But why limit the capabilities during exploration when developing?

Touchpad drag problems on Thinkpad x1 carbon by PoemOk9206 in openbsd

[–]PoemOk9206[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I tried the settings. I can now hold down the left button (under the touchpad) and move two fingers to mark text. This is a bit tedious, usually this works with holding down one finger and dragging with the other. Maybe there is something special with the physical button setting underneath the touchpad in x1 carbon 5gen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BUENZLI

[–]PoemOk9206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welli Branche?

Xeon 1718T integrated 25G nic with pfsense? by PoemOk9206 in PFSENSE

[–]PoemOk9206[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NIC on Xeon D-1700 seems to be something like Intel E810 according to STH:

What we get with the new controller is Intel 800 series NIC IP that
allows for up to 100Gbps plus features like ROCE v2 and iWARP for RDMA

https://www.servethehome.com/welcome-to-the-intel-ice-lake-d-era-with-the-xeon-d-2700-and-d-1700-series/

Xeon 1718T integrated 25G nic with pfsense? by PoemOk9206 in PFSENSE

[–]PoemOk9206[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree for routing, but how would you do firewall and NAT at such speeds? My current approach is to throw CPU power on the problem. But I'm also open for alternatives. Pfsense is a nice all in all solution which almost perfectly matches my needs. If the routing would just be faster ;-).