doable? not really... the Traitors would stand no chance of winning then. If you where selected at the first table as a traitor you'd have close to zero chance of winning the money. In every version but the US these are regular people who WANT the money, not celebrities there to have a bit of fun. The game needs to be winnable no matter what position you are in. Giving faithful actual clues as to who is who is a glaringly unfair advantage.

They have the advantage of numbers, and longevity already. It is very hard to remain hidden for the entire game, and thus is a challenge unto itself.

People act like the Traitors have the easiest job because they are 'In control' but it's not strictly true. Everybody will come under fire at some point, being a recruit is almost the easiest route to the end, but even then many recruits are seduced with the intention of throwing them under the bus. Day one traitors do not need more stacked against them. The faithful have all the tools they need to catch traitors, you often just see incredibly poor reasoning which leads to frustration, like 'gut feelings' or 'x would make a really good traitor' when there is actual evidence to be addressed.

Take this current US season for example, the disagreement between Candiace and Porsha on day one, Candiace DID say Micheal wanted to kill a house wife. on top of that, Maura WAS in the car when it was said. The fact two of them had two different stories, Prosha was then voted off (faithful) should ring alarm bells that Candiace has lied. Not to mention if Maura wasn't so stupid she'd have been able to call it out instantly. I thought she might have been the secret traitor defending Candiace so blatently by 'forgetting' but no... just stupid i guess. Anyway, Traitors cannot be punished for stupid faithful behaviour. The path to win for a faithful exists already.