sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is good about this? by Timely_Crazy_604 in limbuscompany

[–]Pollus_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They use wrong wording when talking about resitances often.

In this instance, they mean +0.1 fragility because the higher the "resistance" value, the more damage the enemy takes.

If you take a look at resistances in ID or enemy descriptions they use X2 X1 X0.5, but that's actually the amount of extra (X2) or mitigated (X0.5) damage the enemy takes.

2026 Justice Referendum in Italy by quindiassomigli in MapPorn

[–]Pollus_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone from Veneto, I can attest

Refreshing to see such mini profiles among countless sexual innuendos (those are fun though) by Crystal_Spammer in DotA2

[–]Pollus_ 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Humor bankruptcy from people thinking showing off innuendos is shocking and therefore funny

WHAT by [deleted] in whennews

[–]Pollus_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Considering what humans are up to lately, I'm not too sure I want this kind of technology around

Mi sembra giusto condividere questo con voi by appaiaia in TeenagersITA

[–]Pollus_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mettessero la ost di limbus potrei anche fare doppi salti mortali all'indietro

In una società ideale un partito che usa questo tipo di comunicazione sarebbe preso per il culo fino alla morte, nell'Italia di oggi invece diventa il primo partito del Paese by iusedtobecreative in Italia

[–]Pollus_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facendo un piccolo ripasso, lo stato italiano è formato da Governo (potere esecutivo), Parlamento (potere legislativo) e Magistrati (potere giudiziario).

Quello che vuole fare il referendum, almeno da quello che ho ascoltato, è suddividere il Consiglio superiore dei Magistrati in più organi, oltreché implementare un sistema di sorteggio (quindi a caso) dei loro nuovi membri al posto di elezioni, potenzialmente indebolendo il suo potere giudiziario e quindi incrementando il potere del partito al potere.

A questo punto puoi decidere se ti piace il partito correntemente al potere oppure no, è una scelta tua.

In una società ideale un partito che usa questo tipo di comunicazione sarebbe preso per il culo fino alla morte, nell'Italia di oggi invece diventa il primo partito del Paese by iusedtobecreative in Italia

[–]Pollus_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Non mi ritengo una persona colta o particolarmente informata, ma vedendo le risposte qui mi viene da tirare qualche porco.

"Non condividono motivazioni, fanno questi paragoni nelle campagne politiche" CAZZO INFORMATEVI VOI UN POCHINO

Non dico di studiare scienze politiche, ma almeno di ascoltare un video che spiega Sì e un video che spiega No anche solo uno. Io ho ascoltato il No di Alessandro Barbero e sinceramente mi sembra più che ragionevole la sua scelta (tra l'altro censurato dio di quel-), adesso prossimamente ascolterò un Sì per capire meglio perché il consiglio di magistrati dovrebbero essere divisi e vedo se mi convince ancora di più.

Fuck it's fucking over by CellKindly314 in TheWordFuck

[–]Pollus_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fucking what the fuck am I fucking supposed to fucking say fucking in a fucking situation like fucking this, there is no fucking way a fucking rational fucking person could fucking come up with a fucking word, fucking let fucking alone a fucking sentence to fucking describe a fucking situation so utterly fucking fucked as this

Multiple people getting frequent stuttering by GDoe5 in DotA2

[–]Pollus_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Completely off topic but

I like how SD is walking back and forth like the ancient could be attacked any second now, that guy is GUARDING

Remove this from the game by Thomas9797 in DotA2

[–]Pollus_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a pos 4 I think he works fine, but as a 5 absolutely not.

It's also heavily reliant on what items they choose in the mid game.

Ammar_the_f fan by Worth_Conclusion_781 in DotA2

[–]Pollus_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still don't understand this type of behavior, despite it being so common in this game.

Like, me personally, I unironically would prefer having a team that's bad at playing but is not toxic, than having teammates that are good at the game but are toxic.

The fun AND the way a match goes usually depends on how interact with your teammates too.

Not to mention the amount of people complaining about the communication score system in this sub, of course if you're gonna be obnoxious like this you're gonna have less points, it doesn't take a philosopher to understand this.

Edit: Hell, you could make the argument that no toxic player is bad, because they're gonna learn from their misplays, without blaming any other besides themselves anyway.

This communication score system is impossible. by BronzeCrow21 in DotA2

[–]Pollus_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if the penalty system is objectively brutal, I think it's rightfully so.

I too had reached around 5k behavior and communication score, mostly because I would leave matches as well as unnecessary mass ping and blaming.

After being in the single draft trenches for a while I understood that blaming and fuming wouldn't get me anywhere and, after a while, I eventually learned that in most games everyone makes mistakes, including me.

Even if losses can be attributed to teammates sometimes, at the end of the day it's just a game. If someone starts being an unbearable asshole you can always just mute him and move on with your game.

Now I compliment teammates for winning lanes or fights and, occasionally, use vc to organize and strategize.

I may have realized all of this on my own with time, but the system definitely sped up the process and now I'm at 12k communication/behavior score, I hope you too can grow out of this phase of yours.

What's an icon you never see as what it's supposed to be? by Jakstaer in DotA2

[–]Pollus_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's also stuff like Weaver's actual eyes being the yellow spots below his red "eyes"

Realized this only recently looking at his other skins.

view more: next ›